• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik questions Amb. Yovanovitch about Burisma

OpportunityCost said:
"the optics" lol, what a fancy word for ethical lapses. Every single democrat I come up against on this issue immediately asks what laws were broken. Ethical lapses come under impeachment considerations.
Click to expand...

If 'ethical lapses' are impeachable then Trump should've been impeached two years ago.
 
bomberfox said:
Who? Im more interested in what the hell Ghouliani is doing with the guys who were canned for enabling corruption and why Ghouliani thinks he has any business acting like he has any official role in foreign affairs.
Click to expand...

The President can send whoever the hell he likes.

FDR did exactly the same thing with Harry Hopkins... someone he trusted above all others.
 
haymarket said:
Actually BOOM goes Stefanik whose performance has been utterly guerrilla theater.
Click to expand...

Another Nuke dropped on the heads of the Democrats:



Stewart: “I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?”



Yovanovitch: “No.”



Stewart: “Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?”



Yovanovitch: “No.”

“The American people know this is nonsense,” Stewart said. “The American people know this is unfair.”

C8476641-2213-41BE-86A9-C8B5A52C941C.jpg
 
Who cares about Burisma? Trump didn't mention the company during the "perfect" phone call.
 
Cardinal said:
I have no idea what set her apart from Nunes or Jordan. Her role was to deflect from Trump’s actions (trump’s actions are the point of the impeachment hearings) and make everything about debunked conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...
Trump released the transcript. It debunked the Weasel-Leaker’s claims right out of the gate... yet the Demented Desperate Dems continued their idiocy to this point... hoping for some form of galactic miracle.

Now they’ve been exposed as morons hell bent on bringing down Trump... just as they tried and failed with Russia, Russia, Russia, Campaign Finance, and Kavanaugh.

Democrats have screwed themselves. That’s wonderful.

Pretty sure that’s what every Republicans has done to date. What was so special about Stefanik pushing debunked conspiracy theories?[/QUOTE]

Stefanik did what others have done, and that’s expose the corrupt, Democrat bull****.

Democrats live in some bizarro parallel universe where they believe the American people hate Trump as much as the Demented Leftists from LA, SF and NY.

The Dems and their parallel universe:
 
Airyaman said:
Who cares about Burisma? Trump didn't mention the company during the "perfect" phone call.
Click to expand...

You’re wrong, as usual.

Or is there additional corruption in the Ukraine Trump was referring to? ROTFLOL...

Trump: … I just want to let you know that’s the other thing. There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you ·can look into it … It sounds horrible to me.

President Zelenskyy: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First of all, I understand and I’m knowledgeable about the situation.: … I just want to let you know that’s the other thing. There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you ·can look into it … It sounds horrible to me.
Click to expand...

View attachment 67268294
 
Last edited:
zimmer said:
Another Nuke dropped on the heads of the Democrats:



Stewart: “I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?”



Yovanovitch: “No.”



Stewart: “Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?”



Yovanovitch: “No.”

“The American people know this is nonsense,” Stewart said. “The American people know this is unfair.”
Click to expand...

Why do you think this is significant?

It is NOT what Ambassador Yovanovitch does not know that is important - it what she did testify to that is revealing.

The right wing is merely defending a corrupt and unfit mentally disturbed president to protect their own extremist agenda.
 
Last edited:
haymarket said:
Why do you think this is significant?

It is NOT what Ambassador Yovanovitch does not know that is important - it what she did testify to that is revealing.

The right wing is merely defending a corrupt and unfit mentally disturbed president to protect their own extremist agenda.
Click to expand...

What these hearings are proving is how corrupt and unfit mentally, Adam Schiff truly is.

His actions during Yovanovitch's testimony and throughout the attempted coup by the Democrats will remain a blight on the House for the rest of history.
 
Moot said:
What corruption involved Biden and his son? I know the optics look bad, but what laws did they break? I think there needs to be something more substantial to investigate them for other than conspiracy theories cooked up by Mulvaney and Giuliani for the benefit of Trump's re-election.
Click to expand...

What corruption involved [Trump]? I know the optics look bad, but what laws did [he] break? I think there needs to be something more substantial to investigate [him] for other than conspiracy theories cooked up by [Schiff] and [Peolosi] for the benefit of [Democrat] election.
 
ocean515 said:
What these hearings are proving is how corrupt and unfit mentally, Adam Schiff truly is.

His actions during Yovanovitch's testimony and throughout the attempted coup by the Democrats will remain a blight on the House for the rest of history.
Click to expand...

Adam Schiff is probably the smartest and most effective Chairman in the recent history of Congress. He is a paragon of the way a Chair should conduct a session. He will be the template for decades for other Chairpeople to conduct their business.

You simply do not like him because he is making the GOP and Trump look terrible. Your objection is entirely political.
 
haymarket said:
Adam Schiff is probably the smartest and most effective Chairman in the recent history of Congress. He is a paragon of the way a Chair should conduct a session. He will be the template for decades for other Chairpeople to conduct their business.
Click to expand...

Not surprised an unstable, crazed lunatic is a hero to the New Democratic Party and it's indoctrinated acolytes.

His stain will never be removed from the annuls of history.

He will be viewed in future decades the same way Joseph McCarthy is viewed today.
 
ocean515 said:
Not surprised an unstable, crazed lunatic is a hero to the New Democratic Party and it's indoctrinated acolytes.

His stain will never be removed from the annuls of history.

He will be viewed in future decades the same way Joseph McCarthy is viewed today.
Click to expand...

Only in the diseased minds of far right wingers who are already divorced from reality.
 
Moot said:
If 'ethical lapses' are impeachable then Trump should've been impeached two years ago.
Click to expand...

Ah, yes the excuse we hear every time a Democrat action should be examined, orange man bad.
 
haymarket said:
Adam Schiff is probably the smartest and most effective Chairman in the recent history of Congress. He is a paragon of the way a Chair should conduct a session. He will be the template for decades for other Chairpeople to conduct their business.

You simply do not like him because he is making the GOP and Trump look terrible. Your objection is entirely political.
Click to expand...

In a completely partisan, dishonest, unethical way.
 
Basically trying to accomplish what Trump couldn't get Zelensky to do.
 
haymarket said:
Specifically, naming specific actions, what has Adam Schiff done wrong?
Click to expand...

Enabling what he said was witness intimidation by bringing up something she wasn't aware of?
Not quoting the entirety of what he claimed was intimidation because it would have opened a can-o-worms for his witness?
 
haymarket said:
Specifically, naming specific actions, what has Adam Schiff done wrong?
Click to expand...

Blocking cross examination. Blocking the minority party from calling witnesses. Helped the whistleblower prepare his initial statement. Attempted to block other committee members from speaking. Blocked committee members from yielding time to other committee members. Leading and possibly tampering with witnesses. Allowing hearsay as evidence. Denying direct first party evidence contrary to the whistleblower.

I'm sure there are more.
 
zimmer said:
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

Click to expand...


Diversion, obfuscation and ignoring validated factual information: she said nothing, asked nothing and came away with nothing.
 
bubbabgone said:
Enabling what he said was witness intimidation by bringing up something she wasn't aware of?
Not quoting the entirety of what he claimed was intimidation because it would have opened a can-o-worms for his witness?
Click to expand...

I am not following your claims here. Please be specific.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom