• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower attorney tweeted of Trump 'coup,' rebellion

3leftsdoo said:
Zaid = Pathetic joke
Click to expand...

Not such a joke for your ****bag. Zaid served the WH with a "cease and desist" order today warning that any threat to the safety of his client would be on ****bag and his fellow thugs.
 
digitusmedius said:
Not such a joke for your ****bag. Zaid served the WH with a "cease and desist" order today warning that any threat to the safety of his client would be on ****bag and his fellow thugs.
Click to expand...

Pathetic, meaningless grandstanding garbage; Zaid's a grotesque joke.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Pathetic, meaningless grandstanding garbage; Zaid's a grotesque joke.
Click to expand...

CORRECTION:

The letter was sent by the OTHER idiot lawyer for the traitorous CIA leaker, namely Andrew Bakaj.
 
It doesn't matter who his lawyer is and it is shameful that POTUS is acting like a Mafia Don. Everything the WB attested to has been verified with even more detail by at least a dozen others. A POTUS swears to uphold the laws of the US, including the WB laws.

Even Miss Hill's life has been threatened by thugs acting on the Don's behalf.

It is not normal for someone who has always been considered the free world to act like a despot and a tyrant.
 
It's all gonna be on TV.
 
bubbabgone said:
Mark Zaid, whistleblower attorney, tweeted of Trump 'coup,' rebellion - Washington Times

th



"Mr. Zaid’s tweet was in response to the firing of Sally Yates as acting attorney general for refusing to follow Mr. Trump’s orders on immigration policy. His use of the word “coup” mimics claims by Trump supporters — often mocked by liberals — that an elected president is being illegally overthrown."
Click to expand...

Even if you bought all that, numerous people have now fully corroborated everything he said (and then some). So its irrelevant at this point. It doesn't matter. Who cares what his motivations were because at this point, you have several people in the administration, under oath, corroborated the whistleblowers accusations. Surely you are not crazy enough to think its some massive conspiracy.
 
CaughtInThe said:
It's all gonna be on TV.
Click to expand...

As predicted the WH is now saying NOOOOOOO, don't make all of this public after pissing and moaning for weeks about how unFAYYYERRRRRRRRRR it was to interview witnesses in closed sessions. I really love watching themselves kick their own asses. You?
 
digitusmedius said:
As predicted the WH is now saying NOOOOOOO, don't make all of this public after pissing and moaning for weeks about how unFAYYYERRRRRRRRRR it was to interview witnesses in closed sessions. I really love watching themselves kick their own asses. You?
Click to expand...

This is truly the funniest timeline.
 
bubbabgone said:
Mark Zaid, whistleblower attorney, tweeted of Trump 'coup,' rebellion - Washington Times

th



"Mr. Zaid’s tweet was in response to the firing of Sally Yates as acting attorney general for refusing to follow Mr. Trump’s orders on immigration policy. His use of the word “coup” mimics claims by Trump supporters — often mocked by liberals — that an elected president is being illegally overthrown."
Click to expand...

Just one of many other axe strikes that could just topple this silly impeachment tree.
 
Praxas said:
There is absolutely NOTHING illegal about this impeachment inquiry. ZIP, NADA, NOTHING. You cons simply look ridiculous when you say so. Quick, hurry up, add in DEEP STATE while you're at it too so you can demonstrate your comments and arguments have gone fully Trumptarded. :lamo
Click to expand...

The president can start an investigation, do some midnight raids on Schiff and the whistleblower's lawyers and see if they can find a crime... that's how the Dems do it.
 
digitusmedius said:
As predicted the WH is now saying NOOOOOOO, don't make all of this public after pissing and moaning for weeks about how unFAYYYERRRRRRRRRR it was to interview witnesses in closed sessions. I really love watching themselves kick their own asses. You?
Click to expand...

I'm enjoying watching strong male Southern Christian republicans be subservient to a New York City criminal who would take Jesus Christ's last piece of bread.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Even if you bought all that, numerous people have now fully corroborated everything he said (and then some). So its irrelevant at this point. It doesn't matter. Who cares what his motivations were because at this point, you have several people in the administration, under oath, corroborated the whistleblowers accusations. Surely you are not crazy enough to think its some massive conspiracy.
Click to expand...
What criminal accusations have been corroborated?

Does a conspiracy have to be a secret to be a conspiracy?
 
jmotivator said:
The president can start an investigation, do some midnight raids on Schiff and the whistleblower's lawyers and see if they can find a crime... that's how the Dems do it.
Click to expand...

No that isn’t how they did it but your ignorance on the subject proves you should just sit down since you have no clue about the proceedings. You already make yourself look foolish with each comment you make on it.
 
Praxas said:
No that isn’t how they did it but your ignorance on the subject proves you should just sit down since you have no clue about the proceedings. You already make yourself look foolish with each comment you make on it.
Click to expand...

Nah, that is exactly how they did it. They literally had no evidence of the presumed crime so they went busting down doors looking for it. They ended up with a crime they had to hand off because it wasn't the maybe-crime they were tasked with finding.. and catching some folks in a perjury trap along the way.

You guys are going to love it if the Republicans return the favor.
 
jmotivator said:
Nah, that is exactly how they did it. They literally had no evidence of the presumed crime so they went busting down doors looking for it. They ended up with a crime they had to hand off because it wasn't the maybe-crime they were tasked with finding.. and catching some folks in a perjury trap along the way.

You guys are going to love it if the Republicans return the favor.
Click to expand...

You cons already blew your political load investigating Bill Clinton for a blowjob. Sorry but there’s plenty of evidence against trump so deal with it. Trump supporters are nothing but dishonest trash.
 
Snoopysvet said:
According to the Whistleblower report and New York Times, Ukraine did not know the aid was being with help until late August, the phone call was July. How do you extort when the victim does not even know they are being extorted. Trump must be the worst extortionist ever.
Click to expand...

Not really, Trump through his minions just kept escalating the price when Ukraine kept balking at the demands. First it was investigations for a phone call, then a meeting, then when that didn't work, Ukraine was told aid depended on it, and Zelenskyy was ready to announce the demanded investigations on Sept 13. Sort of a classic pattern, it appears.
 
jmotivator said:
The president can start an investigation, do some midnight raids on Schiff and the whistleblower's lawyers and see if they can find a crime... that's how the Dems do it.
Click to expand...

That's really a pathetic talking point. So let's not talk about the 'crime' that's been testified to regarding Trump, but pretend it's not FAIR to concern ourselves with it because of some imagined crime you think you might find if we investigated someone else.... :roll:

Did that work for you as a child - "but mom! they might have done something wrong too!!!!"

BTW, got any more pictures of the WB for us? Glad to know the identity is the former PM of Italy! Shocking stuff!
 
bubbabgone said:
What criminal accusations have been corroborated?

Does a conspiracy have to be a secret to be a conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Why are you asking people to summarize thousands of pages of testimony? If you're interested, you can read it for yourself.
 
jmotivator said:
Nah, that is exactly how they did it. They literally had no evidence of the presumed crime so they went busting down doors looking for it. They ended up with a crime they had to hand off because it wasn't the maybe-crime they were tasked with finding.. and catching some folks in a perjury trap along the way.

You guys are going to love it if the Republicans return the favor.
Click to expand...

Some of us are older than 10 years old and remember the Obama years and the 874 Benghazi hearings. A few of us are old enough to have lived through the endless Whitewater hearings.
 
bubbabgone said:
Have you?
Click to expand...

Have you? I'm not asking other people to be my unpaid assistants and summarize them.

For the record, sure, I've read all of a couple and substantial parts of others. Fiona Hill's testimony is up on a tab this morning. I've found it's better to read it for myself versus rely on others. Try that if you want. What it does mean is I don't have to ask you to summarize it for me, which wouldn't be a good thing, since I wouldn't trust your summary.
 
JasperL said:
Have you? I'm not asking other people to be my unpaid assistants and summarize them.

For the record, sure, I've read all of a couple and substantial parts of others. Fiona Hill's testimony is up on a tab this morning. I've found it's better to read it for myself versus rely on others. Try that if you want. What it does mean is I don't have to ask you to summarize it for me, which wouldn't be a good thing, since I wouldn't trust your summary.
Click to expand...

I don't want a summary. I want her quotes.
From what you read, what crime has she corroborated? What did she say? Can you at least quote that much?

I quoted an exchange between Schiff and Taylor the other day to show Schiff leading his own witness. That's the kind of thing you can do to make your point.
If not, I understand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom