• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower attorney tweeted of Trump 'coup,' rebellion

jmotivator said:
Nah, that is exactly how they did it. They literally had no evidence of the presumed crime so they went busting down doors looking for it. They ended up with a crime they had to hand off because it wasn't the maybe-crime they were tasked with finding.. and catching some folks in a perjury trap along the way.

You guys are going to love it if the Republicans return the favor.
Click to expand...

What color is the sky in your make-believe world?
 
bubbabgone said:
I don't want a summary. I want her quotes.
From what you read, what crime has she corroborated? What did she say? Can you at least quote that much?

I quoted an exchange between Schiff and Taylor the other day to show Schiff leading his own witness. That's the kind of thing you can do to make your point.
If not, I understand.
Click to expand...

You think Taylor needed "leading?" He was chomping at the bit to tell the committee what kind of **** your ****bag and his goons were up to. Do you realize by inventing these sorts of fantasies you're just setting yourself up for permanent object of ridicule--not that you're already there.
 
JasperL said:
Not really, Trump through his minions just kept escalating the price when Ukraine kept balking at the demands. First it was investigations for a phone call, then a meeting, then when that didn't work, Ukraine was told aid depended on it, and Zelenskyy was ready to announce the demanded investigations on Sept 13. Sort of a classic pattern, it appears.
Click to expand...

It's pretty amazing that Zelenskiy held out against that pressure long enough for the plot to come to light. He appears to have more talent than just being a comedian.
 
bubbabgone said:
Schiff apparently thought so because he did ...

View attachment 67267910

Speaking of fantasies, I guess you forgot about Schiff's parody on day 1.
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah...that parody really stung ****bag's ass, didn't it? It was a "perfect" parody of the kind of mob style shake down ****bag was trying to pull off. And if you call that "leading" then almost any questioning could be called "leading" by your broad and slanted opinion. Are you a judge? Thought not. But desperate is something else and ****bag supporters are every bit of that.
 
digitusmedius said:
Oh, yeah...that parody really stung ****bag's ass, didn't it? It was a "perfect" parody of the kind of mob style shake down ****bag was trying to pull off. And if you call that "leading" then almost any questioning could be called "leading" by your broad and slanted opinion. Are you a judge? Thought not. But desperate is something else and ****bag supporters are every bit of that.
Click to expand...

I wondered if I should take you seriously and now I know.
 
jmotivator said:
Nah, that is exactly how they did it. They literally had no evidence of the presumed crime so they went busting down doors looking for it. They ended up with a crime they had to hand off because it wasn't the maybe-crime they were tasked with finding.. and catching some folks in a perjury trap along the way.

You guys are going to love it if the Republicans return the favor.
Click to expand...

No president from this time forward will not face impeachment, unless their party controls congress.

That is where we are now.
 
Praxas said:
There is absolutely NOTHING illegal about this impeachment inquiry. ZIP, NADA, NOTHING. You cons simply look ridiculous when you say so. Quick, hurry up, add in DEEP STATE while you're at it too so you can demonstrate your comments and arguments have gone fully Trumptarded. :lamo
Click to expand...

There is nothing illegal about what Trump did either. But, for someone to immediately pronounce a coup of the Presidency after Trump became President is against the law. It's treason. And, that same lawyer apparently is the lawyer for other Democrats like Schiff and Biden.
 
Cougarbear said:
There is nothing illegal about what Trump did either. But, for someone to immediately pronounce a coup of the Presidency after Trump became President is against the law. It's treason. And, that same lawyer apparently is the lawyer for other Democrats like Schiff and Biden.
Click to expand...

I love how Trump supporters say you can't take EVERY word from Trump seriously and now here you Trump supporters can't take your own advice. Almost all Trump supporters are just plain hypocritical idiots. May they all burn in hell like they deserve.
 
bubbabgone said:
What criminal accusations have been corroborated?

Does a conspiracy have to be a secret to be a conspiracy?
Click to expand...

The whistleblower thought Trump was engaging in a quid pro quo to benefit himself politically. We now have other testimony corroborating that:

Impeachment: Vindman says Trump made quid pro quo “demand” of Ukraine’s leader - Vox

Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo - The New York Times

The notion that we should throw it all out because the initial whistleblower may have not have liked Trump is absurd. Generally, when someone gives a criminal scumbag up, its because that individual didn't like scumbag he was giving up. That is how most of these guys go down.

Moreover, Trump is an utterly despicable human being in every way possible. Do you honestly think that extorting the government of Ukraine for his own political benefit would somehow be beneath Trump? Seriously, do you really believe that?
 
bubbabgone said:
Mark Zaid, whistleblower attorney, tweeted of Trump 'coup,' rebellion - Washington Times

th



"Mr. Zaid’s tweet was in response to the firing of Sally Yates as acting attorney general for refusing to follow Mr. Trump’s orders on immigration policy. His use of the word “coup” mimics claims by Trump supporters — often mocked by liberals — that an elected president is being illegally overthrown."
Click to expand...

And the left claims that there is no deep state.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
The whistleblower thought Trump was engaging in a quid pro quo to benefit himself politically. We now have other testimony corroborating that:

Impeachment: Vindman says Trump made quid pro quo “demand” of Ukraine’s leader - Vox

Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo - The New York Times

The notion that we should throw it all out because the initial whistleblower may have not have liked Trump is absurd. Generally, when someone gives a criminal scumbag up, its because that individual didn't like scumbag he was giving up. That is how most of these guys go down.

Moreover, Trump is an utterly despicable human being in every way possible. Do you honestly think that extorting the government of Ukraine for his own political benefit would somehow be beneath Trump? Seriously, do you really believe that?
Click to expand...

There has been no testimony corroborating a QPQ.
A concern by Vindman or a thought by a SCWB, or what others might have heard that gave them their own thoughts & concerns is not corroboration.
What it is is a bunch of people who thought they were in charge of foreign policy.
In the case of the SCWB, his background suggests it was probably something much more involved.
 
bubbabgone said:
There has been no testimony corroborating a QPQ.
A concern by Vindman or a thought by a SCWB, or what others might have heard that gave them their own thoughts & concerns is not corroboration.
What it is is a bunch of people who thought they were in charge of foreign policy.
In the case of the SCWB, his background suggests it was probably something much more involved.
Click to expand...

So basically, your argument is that Trump's administration is far too incompetent to engaged in a QPQ.... I swear, I would give anything if you guys could see what a history textbook will say about Trump and his cult in a 100 years.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
So basically, your argument is that Trump's administration is far too incompetent to engaged in a QPQ.... I swear, I would give anything if you guys could see what a history textbook will say about Trump and his cult in a 100 years.
Click to expand...

You must be answering someone else's post. I can redirect it properly if you let me know who. Or you can do it yourself. They're probably anxious to hear from you.
 
digitusmedius said:
Wishful thinking at its most desperate.
Click to expand...

If you want to call it wishful thinking, but the lot of you working to lie your asses off about one man. Stretched out over the last three years is probably the most desperate aspect of all of this.

I was just pointing out a fact. Because the public is going to see this and it still isn't going to look good for the impeachment hopefuls.
 
Oborosen said:
Because the public is going to see this and it still isn't going to look good for the impeachment hopefuls.
Click to expand...

Now at Wishful Thinking³. Every day the facts look worse for your ****bag and ever day you people dig yourselves deeper into delusions. But you wouldn't be ****bagger's otherwise, though, right?
 
digitusmedius said:
Now at Wishful Thinking³. Every day the facts look worse for your ****bag and ever day you people dig yourselves deeper into delusions. But you wouldn't be ****bagger's otherwise, though, right?
Click to expand...

What facts?
That a man who didn't even have 1st hand knowledge about a phone call, said that he didn't like what he heard, and shared an opinion?

Oh wow, get me a stretcher. Because someone shared an opinion about a phone call, that they had to openly lie about and had to have someone else lie about in front of the American people.

You can talk trash all you like, but it isn't going to make you look like less of the tiny individual that you've repeatedly revealed yourself to be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom