• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hunter Biden’s Ukraine gas firm pressed Obama administration to end corruption allegations

How about Taylors assessment of Trumps motivations being based upon a New York Times article. Absurd.

It is absurd, more so seeing as there are multiple instance of none of this "evidence" being even remotely 1st hand.
 
None of them paying them $60k a month so not sure of the relevance of your point.

Gimmesometruth;107 0893514 said:
POLITICS JUNE 27, 2018 / 1:07 PM / A YEAR AGO
Manafort had $10 million loan from Russian oligarch: court filing
oh darn...ur right.....it wasn't $60K a month.....but I'm close.


These were all before Trump was president and the 2 months Manafort was campaign chairman. AND Manafort was terminated from the campaign within those 2 months when his connections with Russia were revealed. So not sure of the relevance to Biden Jr receiving $60k a month while Biden Sr was vice Pres and point man in Ukraine.
 
It is absurd, more so seeing as there are multiple instance of none of this "evidence" being even remotely 1st hand.

And none of it is evidence of Trumps motives and all is evidence of his opponents view of those motives. I watched that ???Grif Jenkins or something like that last night referring to Taylors aid overhearing a phone conversation with Trump in the background saying "what about the investigations", and Grif no less than 4 times in the next 2 minutes characterizing this as "Investigations into Biden". There were a half a dozen aspects of Trumps desired investigations that had absolutely nothing to do with Biden and this is all condensed down to "investigations into Biden". NOT because of Trumps sentiments but instead because of Grifs.
All this is OTHERS characterizations of Trumps motives from people who oppose his chosen action.

It will be interesting to see this play out in a Senate trial where they have already stated the Federal rules of evidence will apply. 95% of what been in these public hearings wont even be admissible evidence. Strange, usually its the trial done in public while the investigations are done in private. Democrats need the investigation in public because the trial wont contain much
 
Last edited:
From the story:


Your narrative is false. Care to rephrase?

Jasper swoops in all the time with total nonsense in his desperate attempt to exonerate his completely corrupt party.
 
Jasper swoops in all the time with total nonsense in his desperate attempt to exonerate his completely corrupt party.

Hey "American", can you, in your own words, explain this Biden/Burisma corruption thing. I keep seeing that's its all nonsense. You and the blogatorial this thread is based on thinks there is something to it. thanks in advance.
 
Back
Top Bottom