• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Investigation of Clinton emails ends, finding no 'deliberate mishandling'

Bullseye said:
LOL, how can it be exoneration when the found culpability and violations?
Click to expand...

There was no criminal intent. In the now infamous words of Mick Mulvaney, "get over it"
 
HumblePi said:
There was no criminal intent. In the now infamous words of Mick Mulvaney, "get over it"
Click to expand...
Intend is not required for mishandling and failure to protect classified information. Again, the report talks of violations and culpability and says some people may be subject to punishment - doesn't match any definition of "exoneration" I've ever heard.
 
There was "no deliberate mishandling of email" unlike Trump who uses his iPhone every day against the wishes of the State Dept.
 
Just goes to show you. You know enough people, have enough dirt, or even if you're powerful enough. You can basically get away with anything.
 
ocean515 said:
Not by a mile.

Declaring Hillary didn't mean to break the law and put national security at risk when she broke the law and put national security at risk, doesn't absolve her of much.

Considering they didn't have a chance to review the information she destroyed, even though it was subpoenaed, just shines a brighter damning light on her.

And to think, this woman is the reason the left is tearing the country apart.

Something to think about.
Click to expand...

I think it's obvious now that the left are willing to let this family get away with murder, if it means sticking it to Trump.
 
Bullseye said:
Intend is not required for mishandling and failure to protect classified information. Again, the report talks of violations and culpability and says some people may be subject to punishment - doesn't match any definition of "exoneration" I've ever heard.
Click to expand...

HumblePi said:
There was "no deliberate mishandling of email" unlike Trump who uses his iPhone every day against the wishes of the State Dept.
Click to expand...

Here, HumblePi tried to hide by not directly responding. so I fixed it.

Then again, he's still stuck dancing around nonsense that will keep haunting the DNC for a long time.
 
bluesmoke said:
Hey, everybudy, look! Over here, over here! We told ya. Duzens of people involved in the Hillary Email scam busted. 38 Hillary loving libs found CULPABLE!!! CULPBL! Buncha criminuls. Over here, over here!
Click to expand...

You do know that no punishment comes with a charge of "culpable" and why should there be. Most of the "violations" are for items that we just reclassified secret, years after the fact. You expect these public servants to see the future? And you should also remember, Hillary's exoneration comes from Barr's DOJ.
 
Oborosen said:
Here, HumblePi tried to hide by not directly responding. so I fixed it.

Then again, he's still stuck dancing around nonsense that will keep haunting the DNC for a long time.
Click to expand...

You know damn well that when Barr's DOJ exonerates Hillary that puts an end to this. Time to move on.
 
iguanaman said:
You know damn well that when Barr's DOJ exonerates Hillary that puts an end to this. Time to move on.
Click to expand...

So Barr's DOJ was just supposed to "imagine" all of the evidence hat Hillary destroyed back into existence?

Yeah, no office would be flagrant as to attempt that.
 
Oborosen said:
So Barr's DOJ was just supposed to "imagine" all of the evidence hat Hillary destroyed back into existence?

Yeah, no office would be flagrant as to attempt that.
Click to expand...

You mean her personal emails that were hers to destroy? They are history. Get over it.
 
iguanaman said:
You mean her personal emails that were hers to destroy? They are history. Get over it.
Click to expand...

And there you are kids. So long as the left is wiling to forgive this kind of corruption, I'm not really sure they should have much say, or even cause to bitch about anything supposedly done by Trump.

You know, rules for thee and not more me and all that crap.
 
The "Locker her up!" chants were only to agitate the Trump base. Once he got elected the issue was neglected.
 
Oborosen said:
I think it's obvious now that the left are willing to let this family get away with murder, if it means sticking it to Trump.
Click to expand...

If you just list the stuff, the "suicide", pay to play, Charitable Foundations, work with foreign agents to alter elections, manipulation and conspiracy with MSM outlets, breaching of National Security protocols, destruction of evidence, etc., there is no way any US citizen could avoid legal peril.

That is, except the Clintons. And especially Hillary. It's absolutely astonishing.

Anyone who waves their hand and says "nothing there", when it comes to Hillary, has removed themselves from any conversation about President Trump.
 
HumblePi said:
[h=1]Investigation of Clinton emails ends, finding no 'deliberate mishandling'[/h]
The state department has completed its years-long internal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email and found “no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information”.

The investigation, launched more than three years ago, did find violations by 38 people, some of whom may face disciplinary action.

Investigators determined that those 38 people were “culpable” in 91 cases of sending classified information that ended up in Clinton’s personal email, according to a letter sent to Republican senator Chuck Grassley this week and released on Friday. The 38 are current and former state department officials but were not identified.

While there were no findings of deliberate mishandling of classified information, the report made clear that Clinton’s use of the private email while serving as the secretary of state in the Obama administration had increased the vulnerability of classified information.

Investigation of Clinton emails ends, finding no 'deliberate mishandling' | US news | The Guardian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trump has asked "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you can find the 33,000 missing emails". Now we know where they are, and finally once and for all, this trashy conspiracy theory is laid to rest. Hopefully we'll never have to hear another word about "But oh my God, her emails!"
Click to expand...





Naw ... all this does is increase the certainty that the State Dept. is part of the deep state and further justify Trump's efforts to dismantle and demoralize it.
 
Wow, so 1 in 50 emails that went to Hillary violated our national security laws, and that's just the ones we know about -- those received after she had a chance to flush the emails that she didn't want anyone to know about when the knock came at the door.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
It didn't start there. Back in the 90s they claimed the Clinton's were coke dealers, were selling plots at the National Cemetery, and were peddling "documentaries" with titles like "The Clinton Murders".
Click to expand...

And, this is exhibit A in why I don't care how butthurt the Republicans are over the long, wasteful, expensive witch hunt that Democrats are now being accused of. They still have about 4 more years to go, before it is even in regards to what Newt and his crew did to the Clinton's. And ****, I don't even really like the Clinton's.
 
Oborosen said:
Just goes to show you. You know enough people, have enough dirt, or even if you're powerful enough. You can basically get away with anything.
Click to expand...

You should have learned that lesson with OJ.
 
Oborosen said:
I think it's obvious now that the left are willing to let this family get away with murder, if it means sticking it to Trump.
Click to expand...

How would prosecuting Hillary, or Bill, or hell, even Obama remove the corruption of the current POTUS?
That logic don't hold, I mean, I guess it might hold if either of those three were to be on the ballot in 2020.
The Right's absolutely unquenchable hard-on for all things Clinton is no comparison to what we are seeing in the here and now.
 
iguanaman said:
You do know that no punishment comes with a charge of "culpable" and why should there be. Most of the "violations" are for items that we just reclassified secret, years after the fact. You expect these public servants to see the future? And you should also remember, Hillary's exoneration comes from Barr's DOJ.
Click to expand...



Hillary and The Culpables did nothing to deserve the witch hunt by Barr. Barr is a hack of an AG and a discredit to the office. We will see if he is more of an embarrassment than was Republican John Mitchell from the Nixon era who went to jail for multiple crimes.
 
Oborosen said:
And there you are kids. So long as the left is wiling to forgive this kind of corruption, I'm not really sure they should have much say, or even cause to bitch about anything supposedly done by Trump.

You know, rules for thee and not more me and all that crap.
Click to expand...

LOL What about the 22 million emails the Bush Whitehouse illegally destroyed? If Hillary was corrupt for destroying her measly 33,000 personal emails, what heinous crimes was Bush covering up in the 22 million he "lost". We will never know will we? And guess what. You could care less isn't that correct?

The George W. Bush White House 'Lost' 22 Million Emails
 
Last edited:
HumblePi said:
[h=1]Investigation of Clinton emails ends, finding no 'deliberate mishandling'[/h]
The state department has completed its years-long internal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email and found “no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information”.

The investigation, launched more than three years ago, did find violations by 38 people, some of whom may face disciplinary action.

Investigators determined that those 38 people were “culpable” in 91 cases of sending classified information that ended up in Clinton’s personal email, according to a letter sent to Republican senator Chuck Grassley this week and released on Friday. The 38 are current and former state department officials but were not identified.

While there were no findings of deliberate mishandling of classified information, the report made clear that Clinton’s use of the private email while serving as the secretary of state in the Obama administration had increased the vulnerability of classified information.

Investigation of Clinton emails ends, finding no 'deliberate mishandling' | US news | The Guardian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trump has asked "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you can find the 33,000 missing emails". Now we know where they are, and finally once and for all, this trashy conspiracy theory is laid to rest. Hopefully we'll never have to hear another word about "But oh my God, her emails!"
Click to expand...

Most private companies forbid private e mail accounts being used for company business. Apparently this is no longer the case for the government.

In fact, everyone can have their own personal e mail server now!
 
Last edited:
There is no comparison to what Trump is facing in terms of investigations and oversight and what Bill Clinton faced. That is not to say that I think Clinton was without fault, but the Republicans don't have a right to bitch today until congressional Democrats start accusing Trump of being a serial killer and drug kingpin.
 
HumblePi said:
There was "no deliberate mishandling of email" unlike Trump who uses his iPhone every day against the wishes of the State Dept.
Click to expand...

Red Herring. Oh, and just to be clear - the State Department works for Trump, not the other way around. Oh, and the President is the highest classification authority in the government.
 
chuckiechan said:
Most private companies forbid private e mail accounts being used for company business. Apparently this is no longer the case for the government.

In fact, everyone can have their own personal e mail server now!
Click to expand...

Apparently Trump thinks it's okay, he's using his own private iPhone and not the secure phone the secret service wants him to use.
 
Bullseye said:
Red Herring. Oh, and just to be clear - the State Department works for Trump, not the other way around. Oh, and the President is the highest classification authority in the government.
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with using a secure phone that can't be hacked? What you're saying is a real red herring.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom