• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Yup, Looks Like That Big Anti-Trump, Whistleblower Story Was All Smoke And Mirrors

CaughtInThe said:
why are Trump voters so gullible??
Click to expand...

They have been "educated" by the likes of Rush, Hannity and Fox News. They just don't have the metal resources to put it all together.
 
Pound4abrown said:
At this point they have to feign ignorance to cover up for their actual ignorance.
And also, it is hard to admit you voted for the most criminal POTUS in history.
Click to expand...

Where I'm from many sit around and say things like "Well I didn't go to college but I'm still 10 times smarter than Obama/etc"

It appears they're not even smart enough to know when they're being conned. By the most famous conman in the country. That's just said.
 
CaughtInThe said:
why are Trump voters so gullible??
Click to expand...

Might ask the same of liberals. No one has identified the "whistle blower", no one knows if he/she had any valid access, no one has seen the actual charge made by this unknown. No one has read a transcript of the phone conversation with Trump and Ukrainian president. (But they will be able to tomorrow.)

This reminds me of the comment made once by Tom Foley in the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill debacle. " The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this. Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters.
 
According to NPR: House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff says that the intelligence community whistleblower who filed a complaint about President Trump's call with Ukraine wants to talk with his committee.
 
CaughtInThe said:
Where I'm from many sit around and say things like "Well I didn't go to college but I'm still 10 times smarter than Obama/etc"

It appears they're not even smart enough to know when they're being conned. By the most famous conman in the country. That's just said.
Click to expand...

But, in those deep dark spaces that they don't admit to having, they know.
Self delusion isn't mandatory, but it sure helps.
 
Sabre said:
Might ask the same of liberals. No one has identified the "whistle blower", no one knows if he/she had any valid access, no one has seen the actual charge made by this unknown. No one has read a transcript of the phone conversation with Trump and Ukrainian president. (But they will be able to tomorrow.)

This reminds me of the comment made once by Tom Foley in the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill debacle. " The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this. Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters.
Click to expand...

No one knows? Why might that be? Because DNI isn't handing the info to Congress, with compliance to the law?
Yeah. That.
 
Sabre said:
Might ask the same of liberals. No one has identified the "whistle blower", no one knows if he/she had any valid access, no one has seen the actual charge made by this unknown. No one has read a transcript of the phone conversation with Trump and Ukrainian president. (But they will be able to tomorrow.)

This reminds me of the comment made once by Tom Foley in the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill debacle. " The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this. Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters.
Click to expand...

This post is only a few hours old and already looks dumb.

Most suck to support a crook. I guess it's similar to people in Oakland supporting crooks out there.
 
ChezC3 said:
Expect these little Deep State "landmines" to go off more frequently as the election nears. They're going to be pulling out all the stops...
Click to expand...

Deep State? Are you still harping about a Deep State? Damn. That's sooo last year. Even Trump doesn't use that term anymore. Oh wait, is Hannity keeping that nightmare fantasy alive?
 
How many layers are there between the “whistle-blower” and the IG? Someone in the chain of command thinks there is a credible concern.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Front page from what source?

Here's a few questions for you.

Why have Trump, the IC IG, the acting DNI and the DOJ gone balls to the wall to squash this story from its inception?

If there is absolutely no harm, no foul, what was the reason all the above bent over backwards (they still are) to keep the conversations from the House Intelligence Committee?
Click to expand...
Oh, oh! I’ll take Guilty As Hell for $400, Alex!
 
This story is being pushed to eliminate Joe Biden, not Trump, while Democratic Party bosses have gone berserk in their support of Elizabeth Warren. This story destroys Biden and everyone knows it. Its just more endless TDS tantrum throwing in relation to Trump.
 
Grand Mal said:
Deep State? Are you still harping about a Deep State? Damn. That's sooo last year. Even Trump doesn't use that term anymore. Oh wait, is Hannity keeping that nightmare fantasy alive?
Click to expand...

Gullible...
 
zimmer said:
The FAKE NEWS Goebbels Media brain ****s their followers again.

In the process the Biden/Ukraine corruption is a front page story. Oops!!!
Click to expand...

This post hasn't aged well.
 
joko104 said:
This story is being pushed to eliminate Joe Biden, not Trump, while Democratic Party bosses have gone berserk in their support of Elizabeth Warren. This story destroys Biden and everyone knows it. Its just more endless TDS tantrum throwing in relation to Trump.
Click to expand...

B6FA3FD2-C346-4980-BEEB-9CF9C1B6BA00.webp
 
Biden = Toast

On to Warren.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Front page from what source?

Here's a few questions for you.

Why have Trump, the IC IG, the acting DNI and the DOJ gone balls to the wall to squash this story from its inception?

If there is absolutely no harm, no foul, what was the reason all the above bent over backwards (they still are) to keep the conversations from the House Intelligence Committee?
Click to expand...

Are you even paying attention on what has happened yesterday and today? Trump gave over the transcripts of the phone calls. Enough of the drivel from the left. Does the left have any brains left at all? Is it mad cow disease or group hysteria that drives their craziness?
 
leftist66 said:
Not fake.
Click to expand...

What a comeback. Completely fake. The Democrats have egg on their faces again. Grasping at straws as Trump comes closer securing a second term. Thank you Demonuts in the House and Senate.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Biden = Toast

On to Warren.
Click to expand...

I like that these people have convinced themselves that this is a crime committed by Biden but Trump doing the same thing is just fine.
 
Cougarbear said:
Are you even paying attention on what has happened yesterday and today? Trump gave over the transcripts of the phone calls. Enough of the drivel from the left. Does the left have any brains left at all? Is it mad cow disease or group hysteria that drives their craziness?
Click to expand...

He gave over the transcript of one call. He admitted there were several, and that Pence talked to them as well.

Furthermore, the whistleblower complaint appears to go beyond just phone calls.

Is this going to be another scenario where right wingers claim "Trump is totally exonerated" when reading a document that literally says it does not exonerate Trump?
 
Deuce said:
He gave over the transcript of one call. He admitted there were several, and that Pence talked to them as well.

Furthermore, the whistleblower complaint appears to go beyond just phone calls.

Is this going to be another scenario where right wingers claim "Trump is totally exonerated" when reading a document that literally says it does not exonerate Trump?
Click to expand...

This is another scenario where the Democrats crying wolf will not be heard by the general voting public. When you continue to do this, people turn off. Voters turn off. The whistleblower is no known to be a Brenner political plant CIA agent. That's America??? Sounds more like KGB tactics. This person is using hearsay from not only a second party but a third party as well. The IG and AG are well within their legal rights not to have done anything. No one has ever said Trump is perfect. We knew his imperfections and that he would not be the normal President full of corruption as the Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations were. And, that's what we want. So far, all the attacks on Trump have been witch hunts plain and simple. This one as well.
 
Deuce said:
I like that these people have convinced themselves that this is a crime committed by Biden but Trump doing the same thing is just fine.
Click to expand...

It isn't the same thing. Trump's children weren't in the Ukraine at the time benefiting. Biden's son was. The Transcript is clear that Trump was talking about withholding funds because the European nations weren't helping enough. Read the transcripts because the Biden thing didn't come up while the two presidents were discussing funds for military needs. Biden bragged about what he did to support his son by forcing the Ukraine president to fire the prosecutor because the prosecutor was investigating the company Hunter was a leader in. YouTube
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom