• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton blames voter suppression for her election loss

zimmer said:
Goebbels; is a name and therefore referring to “Goebbels” as an “it” is... well... incorrect usage. It might be correct if we did not know the sex of the individual. But we know Goebbels, the scum, was male.*

But let’s entertain the meme you copied and pasted.

Goebbels was a master propagandist. Most of the Mainstream US Media have become Propagandists for their Party, the Democrats, hence the accurate moniker... Goebbels Media. The Goebbels Media has done serious damage. Instead of informing the public, they’re poisoning many. Like you.

86 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List | Sharyl Attkisson

That’s a lie every 11.5 days, with some being vomited on a daily basis for more than 2-years. And look at the mental mess some people have become due to the Goebbels Media.

*it
pro. Used to refer to that one previously mentioned. Used of a nonhuman entity; an animate being whose sex is unspecified, unknown, or irrelevant; a group of objects or individuals; an action; or an abstraction.

More at Wordnik from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
Click to expand...
The idea that respected publications are propaganda outlets, while you worship a leader who lies continuously and calls factual reporting that calls out his lies "fake news" is exactly what Goebbels did for Hitler in Nazi Germany. Trump is using the concept of "lying press" made famous by the Nazi party in Germany during Adolf Hitler's rise to power -- to undermine journalists covering his presidency. This is how the Nazi party rose to absolute authority in Germany -- making Hitler's words the only 'legitimate' news. When we forget what worked then, will work again. Destroying the media's credibility plays an important part in making that scenario of an American dictatorship a reality.

It seems that people like you have fallen for the same scam that Germans fell for decades ago.
 
TheParser said:
Unbelievable!

It's almost time for another presidential election, and Secretary Clinton is STILL whining about her loss.

She certainly deserves a medal for being the BIGGEST SORE LOSER IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN POLITICS.
Click to expand...

Not even close. I would give that award hands down to Andrew Jackson. This excerpt from the Chicago Tribune describes his feelings very well

WHEN ALL HOPE IS LOST - Chicago Tribune
Andrew Jackson was probably the sorest of sore losers. And he wound up winning too. He lost the 1824 presidential contest to John Quincy Adams even though he had won a plurality of the popular vote. When the race was thrown into the House of Representatives, the candidate with the fewest electoral votes, Speaker Henry Clay of Kentucky, provided his support and electoral votes to Adams, who later named Clay as his secretary of state.

Jackson and his supporters labeled this manipulation the "corrupt bargain." In those days secretary of state was seen as a stepping stone to the presidency.

Forget grace and statesmanship. Old Hickory blasted "the rascals at Washington" for their villainy and said he was cheated out of the presidency, said a biographer, Robert Remini of the University of Illinois at Chicago.

From 1824 to 1828, Remini said, Jackson played the role of a victim.

"He said the people's will had been thwarted," Remini said. "He was very popular in the country and, to all his supporters, the so-called corrupt bargain seemed so blatant."
Click to expand...
 
MTAtech said:
The idea that respected publications are propaganda outlets, while you worship a leader who lies continuously and calls factual reporting that calls out his lies "fake news" is exactly what Goebbels did for Hitler in Nazi Germany. Trump is using the concept of "lying press" made famous by the Nazi party in Germany during Adolf Hitler's rise to power -- to undermine journalists covering his presidency. This is how the Nazi party rose to absolute authority in Germany -- making Hitler's words the only 'legitimate' news. When we forget what worked then, will work again. Destroying the media's credibility plays an important part in making that scenario of an American dictatorship a reality.

It seems that people like you have fallen for the same scam that Germans fell for decades ago.
Click to expand...

They’re not respected. Perhaps by you, as Der Stürmer was by rabid Nazi’s.

The Goebbels Media USA has undermined themselves, and poisoned a lot of minds... like yours.

86 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List | Sharyl Attkisson

PS> I was a Leftist, but left the Left due to their misguided, failed ideology and the endless streams of lies they tell to foment it. And since that time the Left has become far more insane.

Americans' Trust in Mass Media Sinks to New Low

They can blame themselves for their demise.
 
~ Democrats did not suppress enough votes - but they were close ! :roll:
 
Bum said:
:confused:

I thought it was the Russians?

Or was it James Comey?

Maybe it was WikiLeaks?

The blame seems to shift periodically....I cant keep track anymore.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm... that word... periodically. Hmmmm... could explain... hmmmm... maybe she’s on hormone treatments and well...

...never mind.

170420_3506031_Emily_s_Editorial_Reply.jpg
 
haymarket said:
Not even close. I would give that award hands down to Andrew Jackson. This excerpt from the Chicago Tribune describes his feelings very well

WHEN ALL HOPE IS LOST - Chicago Tribune
Click to expand...

You were there? ROTFLOL... or are you basing this on one article in an attempt to salvage the carcass of Criminal Hillary?

She’s been abysmal, as has her party and their Goebbels Media.

I hope she runs... ROTFLOL...
 
2,868,686 or 2.09% does not a mandate make. That much is about the population size of NM. I really wish those who site this would give it up. Electoral College is what matters and Trump won that by a landslide.
 
Luther said:
Well, of course you haven't figured out that her winning the popular vote(by about 3 million) is a thermometer of our country

Yep
Click to expand...

Considering that the popular vote is meaningless and has absolutely nothing to do with how we elect presidents. .....why do you even bring it up?

It is an indicator of nothing. .....
 
Lucky 1 said:
Considering that the popular vote is meaningless and has absolutely nothing to do with how we elect presidents. .....why do you even bring it up?

It is an indicator of nothing. .....
Click to expand...

Its not meaningless. It shows a significant amount of disagreement. But so does the 50 million who dont vote show apathy and ignorance. Or the million who vote third party. Even if she had one, the 49% vote for someone else would be significant. Not that partisans care. They only care that their side gets 50% +1.
 
zimmer said:
You were there? ROTFLOL... or are you basing this on one article in an attempt to salvage the carcass of Criminal Hillary?

She’s been abysmal, as has her party and their Goebbels Media.

I hope she runs... ROTFLOL...
Click to expand...

I am providing you with setting you are otherwise apparently willfully blind to - historical perspective.
 
Overitall said:
2,868,686 or 2.09% does not a mandate make. That much is about the population size of NM. I really wish those who site this would give it up. Electoral College is what matters and Trump won that by a landslide.
Click to expand...

Yep... you run an EC election campaign far differently than you would a popular vote election.

Bitter clingers will be bitter clingers... after almost 3-years... they’re still bitter.
 
haymarket said:
I am providing you with setting you are otherwise apparently willfully blind to - historical perspective.
Click to expand...

ROTFLOL... since Election Day... Democrats, Hillary and their Goebbels Media has been unhinged. It’s been entertaining.

I expect that show to continue for another 5-plus years.
 
yankintx said:
Hyperbole much ? Taking your cue Drama Queen in Chief ?
Click to expand...

I'm not taking my cues from the liberal media - that's for sure.

I cant say the same for you. The liberal media is VERY dishonest and only seeks to turn thousands of angry left wingers and liberals into socialists and fascists.
 
Iron_Merc said:
I'm not taking my cues from the liberal media - that's for sure.

I cant say the same for you. The liberal media is VERY dishonest and only seeks to turn thousands of angry left wingers and liberals into socialists and fascists.
Click to expand...

Your foaming at the mouth, again.

Take a breather from the marxist fascists line, its old and tired.
 
Interesting that Hilary is not in the race and the people I see predominantly conservatives. Do they need to harp on Hilary years later to make themselves feel good about their own choice?
 
She suppressed them by ignoring everyone in the rust belt. She's awful.
 
year2late said:
Interesting that Hilary is not in the race and the people I see predominantly conservatives. Do they need to harp on Hilary years later to make themselves feel good about their own choice?
Click to expand...

1. It’s Hillary... with two “l”’s.

2. She keeps putting herself in the limelight.

Iowa is a long way off. I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s waiting for the extremely weak field to thin.
 
zimmer said:
1. It’s Hillary... with two “l”’s.

2. She keeps putting herself in the limelight.

Iowa is a long way off. I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s waiting for the extremely weak field to thin.
Click to expand...

Interesting that the only people I hear blathering on about Hilary is conservatives. Still.

You must really be regretting your choice.

And who cares about how Hilary is spelled? Obviously you do. She is who she is --- a non candidate. She can say what she wants. Interesting that you haven't moved on.
 
hrcwob.jpg

HRC seizes on whatever the idiot leftists are bitching about to try and draw support. I wouldnt be at all surprised if she didnt try to enter the race again if even one of her excuses finds traction.
 
VanceMack said:
You say that now.........
Click to expand...

Do you think I was an ardent supporter?

I saw the :good" in her losing (although I had to pry my son off the ceiling when Trump won:lamo)

We need Congress back. Never a chance with Hilary in office. She had been a lightning rod for decades. We got the House back...onto the Senate and the WH.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom