• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elizabeth Warren Scrubs Website Of Native American DNA Results

What has she apologized for exactly?

Perpetrating a fraud?

Getting caught?

What exactly?

Leave Sleazahontas alone!!!!!! :2mad:

She >takes full responsibility!!!<

:donkeyfla
 
When your house is clean, then you can call other people's houses dirty. You support the biggest phony and the most dishonest president ever and you point to others.

^ ^ More whataboutism.
 
So she's made an empty >apology< and hidden some of the evidence of her fraud.

She definitely deserves a Nobel Prize!

:donkeyfla

When people go to the voting booths in 2020, they will choose between Warren's transgression, which is infinitessimal, and the sum of Trump's transgressions. Which list of transgressions is longer?
 
Apples and oranges. Trump is a populist; Obama was not. That's going to skew the results because voters' expectations are entirely different.


????? No, comparing one presidents approval rating to another Presidents approval rating is comparing apples to apples.
 
^ ^ More whataboutism.
It's not aboutism if we are talking about one candidate vs another, which is what we're talking about. Thus, what Cardinal said above holds.
 
When people go to the voting booths in 2020, they will choose between Warren's transgression, which is infinitessimal, and the sum of Trump's transgressions. Which list of transgressions is longer?

If by Warren you mean Harris...

But this isn't how people vote.

And Warren is a sleazebag.
 
????? No, comparing one presidents approval rating to another Presidents approval rating is comparing apples to apples.
And in that comparison Obama's approval was something like a low of 46%, which would be the high range for Trump. Obama also had approves in the 60s, which Trump would orgasm if he had anywhere near that.
 
It's not aboutism if we are talking about one candidate vs another, which is what we're talking about. Thus, what Cardinal said above holds.

If we were doing that, you'd be right. :)
 
Leave Sleazahontas alone!!!!!! :2mad:

She >takes full responsibility!!!<

:donkeyfla

Don't lose your cool and reveal your game. I warned you about that last night.
 
If by Warren you mean Harris...

But this isn't how people vote.

And Warren is a sleazebag.

Which list of transgressions is longer: Trump's or Warren's?
 
What? You don’t like a thread that’s critical of a Dem? That just so unexpected.

I might have to get a restraining order here. No, i won't have sex with you. Stop stalking me.
 
Both speak with forked tongue.

Politicians.

That's not what I asked. Which list of transgressions is longer: Trump's or Warren's?
 
Either this is useless rhetoric, or....i'm not sure what else.

This is the problem with Trump's America. There is no more "i disagree with this politician's position" it's "This person is pure evil and my preferred candidate is better than Jesus"

Let me clarify....she's dangerous for economic America,mostly
 
It's quite sad that anyone who thinks her proving her family story correct will lead people who might conceivably vote Democrat to not vote for her based on some standard about just how Indian you have to be to tell a family story, a standard that invented by those who would never vote Democrat in order to smear a Democrat.
 
What? You don’t like a thread that’s critical of a Dem? That just so unexpected.

What? You glom onto it specifically because it's critical of a Dem? That just so unexpected.




(In other words, it would be nice if people who play these DP games would poke about in their closets, or at the very least look in their back yards, before doing so)
 
It's quite sad that anyone who thinks her proving her family story correct will lead people who might conceivably vote Democrat to not vote for her based on some standard about just how Indian you have to be to tell a family story, a standard that invented by those who would never vote Democrat in order to smear a Democrat.

The fact of the matter is that Democrats and Native Americans give 1024th the crap about this that Republicans do.
 
whataboutism

No. Reality.

When discussing a Democratic candidate, it is always in comparison with candidates he or she is running against, and one of those candidates is Trump. And compared to Warren, Trump is the world's worst human.
 
What? You glom onto it specifically because it's critical of a Dem? That just so unexpected.




(In other words, it would be nice if people who play these DP games would poke about in their closets, or at the very least look in their back yards, before doing so)

No, it's just personsl animosity towards me.
 
Warren was mocked for claiming some Native American heritage. She disclosed DNA results showing that she did have some NA heritage. Case closed. Move on, she has.
 
Warren was mocked for claiming some Native American heritage. She disclosed DNA results showing that she did have some NA heritage. Case closed. Move on, she has.

Yep, she is just another rich white person again and will likely have to apologize for that too.
 
Back
Top Bottom