• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World's biggest brothel throws down challenge to sex robots: 'They can't compete'

TheParser said:
Thanks for your opinion.

I think that many of those World War II soldiers were "men." In fact, they were the Greatest Generation.
Click to expand...

Not a bad point.

The prudish judgement of illiberals can really be something...
 
americanwoman said:
"Men" pay for a ton of weird ****. Like weird. You don't really see women paying for some man's used underwear or for him to sit naked on a cake reading nursery rhymes.
Click to expand...

Each gender commodifies, objectifies and dehumanizes the other in horrendous ways.

A lot of attention going one way, not so much the other.

But cake sitting seems pretty harmless.
 
joko104 said:
This is a political forum. Why do you start so many threads about sex? :confused:
Click to expand...

Hey now!

Sex and politics go together like cake and lady-butt!!
 
joko104 said:
I think most Democrats want to force poor teenagers and women into prostitution. I recall prominent Democrats claiming that Stormy Daniels is someone that women should pattern their careers upon.

Supporting legal prostitution is no different than supporting poor people being allowed to sell their body parts to rich people. Due to advances in modern medicine, a poor person could sell their (or scalp to bald people, their arms, legs, eyes, bones, skin, a lung, kidney - just about everything as a "consensual sale."

Just like young drug addicts addictions are used to force them into prostitution, it also could be used to force drug addicts into selling their body parts. A month's worth of meth for a kidney. 3 months for an eye. 6 months for a lung, a year their scalp for the hair. One body part at a time. Or maybe an entire sale of all body parts not needed to technically be alive. Arms. Legs. Face.

At least in those "consensual" transactions poor young people won't be beaten, raped or infected with deadly diseases. $50 of meth in exchange for sex and contracting Hepititus, TB and herpes. Legalized punishment for being poor or a drug addiction. Diseases loser men on top of her infecting her - the now legal pimp getting rich off infecting poor young addicts with pitiful men's diseases.
Click to expand...

Remind me not to go to Joko's bachelor party... :shock:
 
joko104 said:
A lot of idiots think the movie "Pretty Woman" is a documentary on the typical life of a prostitute.

Did you know in the original script of Petty Woman, the storyline was of the horrors of being a prostitution. Her friend? She dies of an overdose in the original script and the rich guy threw the "pretty woman" to the curb after his lawyer violently beat and raped her, with the rich guy saying she wasn't worth it, not paying her.

That is the reality of prostitution, not the bizarre fake romance story the actors changed it to.
Click to expand...

The realities of prostitution vary wildly.
 
joko104 said:
Since many claim it is just a profession, then go on record to this question:

1,)If you were single, would you be willing to marry a person who had been a long term professional prostitution of hundreds or thousands of past clients?

2.) Your 18 year old daughter says to avoid college debts, says she is thinking of taking a part time job at a strip club that pays three time what any other job pays. For this, she has to do strip routines and have sex with anyone the club says unless the person is acting violent. However, she is unsure and wants your opinion. Would you say "that's great! Wow, 3 times the salary! Sex with men is just a job anyway. It doesn't mean anything. At least you're getting paid for it."

Both are yes or no questions.
Click to expand...

Neither are yes or no questions.

1) I know an enormously talented and successful man - also astonishingly good looking - who met an escort, wooed and wed her. They're happy and have two kids at last check.

2) Strippers generally do sex on the side if they're so inclined. Many are not so inclined.
 
Moderate Right said:
I don't believe I ever said anything about the relationship I have. You are assuming things you know nothing about and my relationship is none of your business. And, by the way, you are pretty much wrong with your assumptions. All I said was that everyone pays for sex one way or another, including women. Apparently AM believes that men pay for sex and she wants them to pay even their wives by being pro-choice. And, you are right, she is a total idiot. Apparently she believes it's a man's world that is against abortion and the women of the world have to suffer for it. She seems to have no clue that many men are pro-choice and many women are anti-abortion.
Click to expand...

Some good points.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Men do.

Women too.

And pay has many meanings.
Click to expand...

I have known women that wanted a cell phone, some shoes and a few dresses with the understanding that sex would be available as an "appreciation". More than one proudly proclaimed that she didn't sell her body for money and therefore wasn't a prostitute. Works for me.
 
This is a fascinating thread; hats off to the OP.

:)
 
Tlrmln said:
How does that have anything to do with the discussion? Women engaged in legal prostitution aren't required to do "anything their employer says, no matter how disease dangerous."
Click to expand...

Safety laws prohibit clearly dangerous employment activities - whether or not the employee agrees. Prostitution is inherently an extremely dangerous profession.

Last month, a roofing company (mom-pop) was fined $5000 because the roofers didn't have safety lines on doing a roof on a 2 story house. The employer had safety lines and rules required it. But the roofers hate them and didn't put them on. Still, the employer was liable.

It is impossible to make prostitution safe unless there is a trained and skilled body guard present - and even then the disease dangers still exist.

Do you know how HARD it is to get the badge to work in a lab that handles biologicals such as STDs? Government safety standards. Yet that is exactly what a prostitute does - and with none of the safety policies, procedures and equipment.

What about prostitution is legal, proved the prostitute is fully covered in a Class IV hazmat suit with independent air tank as a compromise? IF placed under OSHA rules, that would be required - and procedures to insure it is done too, complete with documentation records.
 
joko104 said:
Safety laws prohibit clearly dangerous employment activities - whether or not the employee agrees. Prostitution is inherently an extremely dangerous profession.

Last month, a roofing company (mom-pop) was fined $5000 because the roofers didn't have safety lines on doing a roof on a 2 story house. The employer had safety lines and rules required it. But the roofers hate them and didn't put them on. Still, the employer was liable.

It is impossible to make prostitution safe unless there is a trained and skilled body guard present - and even then the disease dangers still exist.

Do you know how HARD it is to get the badge to work in a lab that handles biologicals such as STDs? Government safety standards. Yet that is exactly what a prostitute does - and with none of the safety policies, procedures and equipment.

What about prostitution is legal, proved the prostitute is fully covered in a Class IV hazmat suit with independent air tank as a compromise? IF placed under OSHA rules, that would be required - and procedures to insure it is done too, complete with documentation records.
Click to expand...

That's why it's best only to provide the venue and not create an employee-employer relationship. A hotel could offer a "socializing room" where such things are negotiated. The only thing that would change is laws against solicitation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom