- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,858
- Reaction score
- 8,338
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
This is not good
It looks like the White House is playing with public opinion by issuing threats while at the same time being rather ambiguous as to whether or not some action is actually being planned.
There are mounting signs of military planning for Venezuela
President Donald Trump has been talking about ordering a military operation targeting Venezuela since 2017.
At first, that was widely dismissed as a rash threat, but the idea of a U.S. effort to force “regime change” in the oil-rich South American country may be gaining momentum in Washington.
“It’s a regime that, frankly, could be toppled very quickly by the military if the military decides to do that,” Trump said in September.
In January, National Security Adviser John Bolton flashed a notebook that read “5,000 troops to Colombia."
And on Monday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo ordered all U.S. diplomats to leave Venezuela, saying their presence there “has become a constraint on U.S. policy,” hinting at opening potential military options.
Speculation about a military assault on Venezuela was also fueled by Trump’s recent appointment of a former George W. Bush administration official who was an architect of the Iraq War, Elliot Abrams, to be the new “Special Representative for Venezuela.”
It looks like the White House is playing with public opinion by issuing threats while at the same time being rather ambiguous as to whether or not some action is actually being planned.
So far, neither the White House nor the Pentagon has signaled what approach the U.S. might take to end the crisis.
“They keep saying ‘all the options are on the table,’ but they refuse to articulate them. That’s kind of weird, and we’re left to speculate,”