• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Adam Schiff Hires a Former Prosecutor to Lead the Trump Investigation

Nope. You won't get any "truth" out of the House Dems. You'll only get a massive amount of anti Trump propaganda for the 2020 election.

Projection. You assume that because Republicans have a sacred duty to lie for and protect Donald Trump at all costs, then everybody else must be driven by the same corrupt motives.
 
Msnbc? Brennan center? Political bias easily established.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk

You either have no idea what "impartial" means or you've stretched the definition of the word into meaninglessness.
 
Please demonstrate any bias on his part.

Go ahead, I'll wait.
He represented and appeared as an agent for highly biased organizations and forwarded their viewpoints publicly.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
American civics lesson: the minority party has no say in any investigations or oversight conducted. They're glorified paper weights. That's why the 2018 election was so important. Democrats are no longer paper weights, and you're just going to have to accept that oversight exists again.



I knew you would avoid answering the question because the answer is obvious and destroys your position.

I don't answer irrelevant silly questions or those intended to change the subject. Thanks for understanding.

And the minority party has every bit as much right to do its own research, investigations, gather information, and interrogate witnesses as much as the majority party does. And in the case of the Democrats they have a mostly leftist, supportive media that is an important arm of the Democrat Party, something the now Republican minority in the House does not enjoy. Plus the Democrats had their own operatives in the FBI and Justice Department though that is gradually being corrected.

Being in the minority did not even slow down Adam Schiff and company in their intent to overturn an American election because they don't like how it turned out.
 
You either have no idea what "impartial" means or you've stretched the definition of the word into meaninglessness.
You assume such but you don't have any idea.


Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
He represented and appeared as an agent for highly biased organizations and forwarded their viewpoints publicly.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk

So in addition to "impartial," you also have no idea what "agent" means. How are you able to get through the week with such a terrible grasp of the English language?
 
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.

For 2 yrs all you libs did was to claim you have proof of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, but you never provided who Trump colluded with (names of Russians) you never provided proof of what they colluded to do. You never provided proof of what they colluded to do was actually accomplished. But all you libs made yourself feel good thinking you had all the evidence to kill trump with collusion with the Russians.

And for those two years you libs kissed the feet of Mueller, and you were 100% convinced Mueller was going to prove collusion.

NOW the Mueller investigation can't be trusted. Geee, so all your proof of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians and you praising Mueller's investigation and I don't know how many times you libs wanted congress to make it so Trump could not fire Mueller, is all down the toilet.

You know there will be no collusion in Mueller's report, so you throw him under the bus and now you hang your hat on the House to come up with collusion that every investigation has proved there is no collusion.

You libs hate Trump so much that you can't even think straight. At every turn, "we got Trump now"

Coming up was good legislation for the American People is not even a consideration for you libs, your only objective is to kill Trump. And it really pisses you libs off that you can't get him, it drives you crazy.
 
It is only the concern of people who believe it is their sacred duty to lie for and protect Donald Trump at all costs. To the rest of America, Democrats are doing precisely what we sent them there to do.
Thanks, I was wondering how much that bubble of yours distorted your view of the real world.
 
I don't answer irrelevant silly questions or those intended to change the subject. Thanks for understanding.

And the minority party has every bit as much right to do its own research, investigations, gather information, and interrogate witnesses as much as the majority party does. And in the case of the Democrats they have a mostly leftist, supportive media that is an important arm of the Democrat Party, something the now Republican minority in the House does not enjoy. Plus the Democrats had their own operatives in the FBI and Justice Department though that is gradually being corrected.

Being in the minority did not even slow down Adam Schiff and company in their intent to overturn an American election because they don't like how it turned out.

The minority party has as much power to conduct investigations and oversight as you and I do. Your lack of understanding of this point must be why you're so confused why the 2018 election created such a renaissance in Congress's willingness to conduct oversight.
 
Where's the highly partisan body of work/evidence Daniel has produced, to make you believe he's anything but a career federal prosecutor, Standford law graduate?
Legal analyst for msnbc doesnt mean such? You know the legal analysis they tend to broadcast is highly partisan, he helped create such work product.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
For 2 yrs all you libs di-

I have to go to work now. I'll leave you guys to gnash your teeth over the fact that Congressional oversight exists once more.

Have a great day.
 
Projection. You assume that because Republicans have a sacred duty to lie for and protect Donald Trump at all costs, then everybody else must be driven by the same corrupt motives.

I don't assume about the Republicans. They are irrelevant in regard to the House Dem's actions.
 
He represented and appeared as an agent for highly biased organizations and forwarded their viewpoints publicly.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk

So you have no evidence of any actual bias, just superimposing your fantasies over his record.

Got it. Thanks
 
So in addition to "impartial," you also have no idea what "agent" means. How are you able to get through the week with such a terrible grasp of the English language?
Out comes the insults, troll on your own time.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
For 2 yrs all you libs did was to claim you have proof of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, but you never provided who Trump colluded with (names of Russians) you never provided proof of what they colluded to do. You never provided proof of what they colluded to do was actually accomplished.
While I won't speak for "libs", this is a lie.

The names have been provided and what the collusion entailed has been stated. Whether you choose to read it or not is up to you.

And for those two years you libs kissed the feet of Mueller, and you were 100% convinced Mueller was going to prove collusion.

NOW the Mueller investigation can't be trusted.
No one is saying that. What people are saying is that the OVERSIGHT of the Mueller investigation cannot be trusted, as Trump deliberately hired a new attorney general who will not recuse himself from the investigation and has a history of criticizing it.

If you cannot see the difference it is because you do not want to.

You know there will be no collusion in Mueller's report
Mueller has already shown collusion through court filings. Why are you posting lies?
 
The minority party has as much power to conduct investigations and oversight as you and I do. Your lack of understanding of this point must be why you're so confused why the 2018 election created such a renaissance in Congress's willingness to conduct oversight.

You must not know who Adam Schiff is or anything that he has been doing the last two years. If you did, you wouldn't say that.
 
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.
...


Is Schiff saying that Mueller was an incompetent idiot?!? :lamo
 
So you have no evidence of any actual bias, just superimposing your fantasies over his record.

Got it. Thanks
Thanks for your agreement.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.



Adam Schiff Hires a Former Prosecutor to Lead the Trump Investigation | The New Yorker

I absolutely LOVE IT!!!!!!!
 
I have to go to work now. I'll leave you guys to gnash your teeth over the fact that Congressional oversight exists once more.

Have a great day.

Yeah now that you have all that Congressional oversight, investigate Mueller and his report, you may just find where Mueller falseafied the report to cover for Trump and his collusion with the Russians. Then the House can make their recommendation to the DOJ to indict Mueller for falsifying the report.
 
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.



Adam Schiff Hires a Former Prosecutor to Lead the Trump Investigation | The New Yorker

The Southern District of New York is going to be a household name as a result of the Trump Presidency. I'd venture to guess 90% of Americans (if not more) never knew of their existence before all the interaction with the Trump circle.
 
Back
Top Bottom