- Joined
- Jun 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,150
- Reaction score
- 15,598
- Location
- No longer Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Please demonstrate any bias on his part.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
Nope. You won't get any "truth" out of the House Dems. You'll only get a massive amount of anti Trump propaganda for the 2020 election.
Msnbc? Brennan center? Political bias easily established.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
He represented and appeared as an agent for highly biased organizations and forwarded their viewpoints publicly.Please demonstrate any bias on his part.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
American civics lesson: the minority party has no say in any investigations or oversight conducted. They're glorified paper weights. That's why the 2018 election was so important. Democrats are no longer paper weights, and you're just going to have to accept that oversight exists again.
I knew you would avoid answering the question because the answer is obvious and destroys your position.
You assume such but you don't have any idea.You either have no idea what "impartial" means or you've stretched the definition of the word into meaninglessness.
He represented and appeared as an agent for highly biased organizations and forwarded their viewpoints publicly.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
He's totes impartial:
Daniel Goldman | Brennan Center for Justice
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.
Thanks, I was wondering how much that bubble of yours distorted your view of the real world.It is only the concern of people who believe it is their sacred duty to lie for and protect Donald Trump at all costs. To the rest of America, Democrats are doing precisely what we sent them there to do.
I don't answer irrelevant silly questions or those intended to change the subject. Thanks for understanding.
And the minority party has every bit as much right to do its own research, investigations, gather information, and interrogate witnesses as much as the majority party does. And in the case of the Democrats they have a mostly leftist, supportive media that is an important arm of the Democrat Party, something the now Republican minority in the House does not enjoy. Plus the Democrats had their own operatives in the FBI and Justice Department though that is gradually being corrected.
Being in the minority did not even slow down Adam Schiff and company in their intent to overturn an American election because they don't like how it turned out.
Legal analyst for msnbc doesnt mean such? You know the legal analysis they tend to broadcast is highly partisan, he helped create such work product.Where's the highly partisan body of work/evidence Daniel has produced, to make you believe he's anything but a career federal prosecutor, Standford law graduate?
For 2 yrs all you libs di-
Projection. You assume that because Republicans have a sacred duty to lie for and protect Donald Trump at all costs, then everybody else must be driven by the same corrupt motives.
He represented and appeared as an agent for highly biased organizations and forwarded their viewpoints publicly.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
Out comes the insults, troll on your own time.So in addition to "impartial," you also have no idea what "agent" means. How are you able to get through the week with such a terrible grasp of the English language?
While I won't speak for "libs", this is a lie.For 2 yrs all you libs did was to claim you have proof of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, but you never provided who Trump colluded with (names of Russians) you never provided proof of what they colluded to do. You never provided proof of what they colluded to do was actually accomplished.
No one is saying that. What people are saying is that the OVERSIGHT of the Mueller investigation cannot be trusted, as Trump deliberately hired a new attorney general who will not recuse himself from the investigation and has a history of criticizing it.And for those two years you libs kissed the feet of Mueller, and you were 100% convinced Mueller was going to prove collusion.
NOW the Mueller investigation can't be trusted.
Mueller has already shown collusion through court filings. Why are you posting lies?You know there will be no collusion in Mueller's report
The minority party has as much power to conduct investigations and oversight as you and I do. Your lack of understanding of this point must be why you're so confused why the 2018 election created such a renaissance in Congress's willingness to conduct oversight.
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.
...
Thanks for your agreement.So you have no evidence of any actual bias, just superimposing your fantasies over his record.
Got it. Thanks
You don't approve of him now that he isn't being supervised by an Obama/Clinton today?
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.
Adam Schiff Hires a Former Prosecutor to Lead the Trump Investigation | The New Yorker
Thanks for your agreement.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
I have to go to work now. I'll leave you guys to gnash your teeth over the fact that Congressional oversight exists once more.
Have a great day.
This is more like it. The DOJ is an absolute mess due to the disintegration of the wall between the White House and the DOJ since Trump appointed two toadies who prejudged the Special Counsel investigation to be AG as well as the Deputy AG. As a result, the Mueller investigation can't be trusted to be supervised without bias, and the final report can't be trusted to become public without it being edited or censored for the purpose of protecting Donald Trump. With the former chief deputy of the SDNY's organized crime unit in control of the House's investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, we are likely to get the unvarnished truth about what happened.
Adam Schiff Hires a Former Prosecutor to Lead the Trump Investigation | The New Yorker