• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rising conservative activist Candace Owens criticized over Hitler comments

Yep, and her biggest sin was saying was a globalist, not a nationalist - inflaming the composite fury of the globalist press and commentating class.

Here's what she actually said:

Hitler was a globalist. He had the same ambition as the Democrats, which was a new world order that he(they) would run. The New Green Deal is an appeal to nationalism; US pride in leading a change, that then leads to a new world order; Paris Accord.

Hilter was also a socialist. He changed his party name to the Nationalsozialistischm Deutsche Arbeiterpartei ("National Socialist German Workers' Party", or Nazi Party). Nazi is an acronym for socialism. Fake news and propaganda never goes there, since it need to hide the true long term intent.

Hitler used nationalism as means to an end, which was globalism. He used nationalism to rebuild his war destroyed country, back to first world. Then he used this stepping stone to form a new European Union and beyond. The Democrats are doing the same thing, but with con artists and lawyers. They sell socialism as a utopian vision, even though history shows it regresses into a dictatorship as did Hitler. The Russians; Soviet Union was a good example of socialism and nationalism; Russians, with world wide ambitions.

Trump is doing the opposite of forming of type of nationalism leading to globalism. He breaking global ties and is making the globalists mad, with tariffs, which will make it harder to repair the bridges needed for another Democrat Socialists or Nazi party. What Trump is doing is similar to a caterpillar spinning a cocoon that will isolate the caterpillar, while it undergoes metamorphosis into a butterfly; beautiful but harmless.
 
Last edited:
Patriotism and Nationalism are nearly interchangeable. It mostly means that you support your country and want to do what's best for it and it's people. It doesn't mean that you think it's perfect and never does anything wrong.

Close. I would say that a nationalist is one who supports the idea of the nation state. Like, for example, the Irish who understandably considered themselves to be a nation and wanted their own state. This Englishman is lad the Irish achieved there aim. But as usual things are not that simple th Northern Irish protestants also think they are a nation.

Anyway, all the various forms of democracy were invented in nation states. Places where the entire population felt some sort of common identity. Where one lot could lose an election but believe that they might win the next one and, crucially, that those in power would peacefully hand it over. Nearly every African country is not a nation state but one made up of many tribes who manifestly do NOT feel the sense of common identity that would allow 'democracy' to happen, which is the main reason why democracy just has not happened is nearly all the African continent.

Which is why I believe the world needs more nationalism - and why those who try to divide the US into separate 'nations' are dangerous enemies of democracy.
 
Hitler was a globalist. He had the same ambition as the Democrats, which was a new world order that he(they) would run. The New Green Deal is an appeal to nationalism; US pride in leading a change, that then leads to a new world order; Paris Accord.

Hilter was also a socialist. He changed his party name to the Nationalsozialistischm Deutsche Arbeiterpartei ("National Socialist German Workers' Party", or Nazi Party). Nazi is an acronym for socialism. Fake news and propaganda never goes there, since it need to hide the true long term intent.

Hitler used nationalism as means to an end, which was globalism. He used nationalism to rebuild his war destroyed country, back to first world. Then he used this stepping stone to form a new European Union and beyond. The Democrats are doing the same thing, but with con artists and lawyers. They sell socialism as a utopian vision, even though history shows it regresses into a dictatorship as did Hitler. The Russians; Soviet Union was a good example of socialism and nationalism; Russians, with world wide ambitions.

Trump is doing the opposite of forming of type of nationalism leading to globalism. He breaking global ties and is making the globalists mad, with tariffs, which will make it harder to repair the bridges needed for another Democrat Socialists or Nazi party. What Trump is doing is similar to a caterpillar spinning a cocoon that will isolate the caterpillar, while it undergoes metamorphosis into a butterfly; beautiful but harmless.

Hitler was a theocratic oligarch, not a socialist. He used socialist in the Nazi title to encourage empathy to his cause.

Democratic socialism and socialism in general is anathema to fascism and national socialism -is fascism.-

I so tire of these faux news descriptions of socialism.
 
Don’t tell us about your intolerance of bigots.

You aren’t one lick better than those sick ****s. For you believe your Democrat Party are a bunch of violent bigots... and reveal being one yourself.*

In your own words from just one thread. I wonder what other fecal gems you’ve left throughout DP:











Being an admitted bigot, how can you “tolerate” yourself?

*The beauty of free speech.

PS. Nationalism is not White Nationalism. But, you’re too much of a thick-skulled bigot (proven by your posts above) to get simple facts straight.

Good to see you White Nationalists running scared.....Using the Black Lady to promote your cause...LOL
 
Hitler was a globalist. He had the same ambition as the Democrats, which was a new world order that he(they) would run. The New Green Deal is an appeal to nationalism; US pride in leading a change, that then leads to a new world order; Paris Accord.

Hilter was also a socialist. He changed his party name to the Nationalsozialistischm Deutsche Arbeiterpartei ("National Socialist German Workers' Party", or Nazi Party). Nazi is an acronym for socialism. Fake news and propaganda never goes there, since it need to hide the true long term intent.

Hitler used nationalism as means to an end, which was globalism. He used nationalism to rebuild his war destroyed country, back to first world. Then he used this stepping stone to form a new European Union and beyond. The Democrats are doing the same thing, but with con artists and lawyers. They sell socialism as a utopian vision, even though history shows it regresses into a dictatorship as did Hitler. The Russians; Soviet Union was a good example of socialism and nationalism; Russians, with world wide ambitions.

Trump is doing the opposite of forming of type of nationalism leading to globalism. He breaking global ties and is making the globalists mad, with tariffs, which will make it harder to repair the bridges needed for another Democrat Socialists or Nazi party. What Trump is doing is similar to a caterpillar spinning a cocoon that will isolate the caterpillar, while it undergoes metamorphosis into a butterfly; beautiful but harmless.

Epic Babble......BULL****
 
Yep, and her biggest sin was saying was a globalist, not a nationalist - inflaming the composite fury of the globalist press and commentating class.

Here's what she actually said:

That isnt any better, I do not want that type of life for my kids. Nationalism was never good for the citizens of Germany, and especially those that were Jewish or did not go along with the program. Those people were exterminated.

Nationalism is never good. ANd if you want to talk about globalism, well that is just nationalism on a global level. It makes your argument sound very stupid at best.
 
That isnt any better, I do not want that type of life for my kids. Nationalism was never good for the citizens of Germany, and especially those that were Jewish or did not go along with the program. Those people were exterminated.

Nationalism is never good. ANd if you want to talk about globalism, well that is just nationalism on a global level. It makes your argument sound very stupid at best.
LOL, quite humorous coming from a person saying globalism is just nationalism at a global level. :eek:
 
LOL, quite humorous coming from a person saying globalism is just nationalism at a global level. :eek:

Perhaps you will better understand this: Right wing conspiracy theories about globalism and the new world order and all that crap, equates nationalism. In other words you are supporting globalism on a national level instead of global.

Hell you even quoted a nationalist asserting that and still do not understand. " You know, he was a national socialist, but if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine. " That part right there says that she was fine with a dictatorship and equated that with what nationalists are. You do understand that by nationalist she meant Nazism but just within the borders?
 
:lamo

What a pathetic weak defense.

Hitler’s domestic policies were absolutely horrific and responsible for immense suffering long before he looked “outside of Germany”.

Indeed, territorial expansion was the main goal of his plan to “make Germany great again”.

Saying that the problem was simply that he had “dreams outside of Germany” is what people are objecting to.....and nothing that you have said changes that.

You make a valid point. She should have said something like, "If all he wanted to do was make Germany efficient and prosperous, then OK fine, but of course he unleashed the dogs internally and externally", or words to that effect, it would have been much better.

Bottom line still remains that she was NOT defending Hitler, and you know it.
 
You make a valid point. She should have said something like, "If all he wanted to do was make Germany efficient and prosperous, then OK fine, but of course he unleashed the dogs internally and externally", or words to that effect, it would have been much better.

Bottom line still remains that she was NOT defending Hitler, and you know it.

You still defending this Alt Right Bitch?...............Too Funny
 
Patriotism and Nationalism are nearly interchangeable. It mostly means that you support your country and want to do what's best for it and it's people.

"Nearly interchangeable" is not the same as "interchangeable".

We have different words so that we can express different shades of meaning.

I have made it clear how I differentiate between "Patriotism" and "Nationalism".

It doesn't mean that you think it's perfect and never does anything wrong.

But the "Nationalist" is quite willing to support their country even when they know that what their country is doing is wrong while the "Patriot" is not.

That is because the "Patriot" actually attempts to live by what their country says it stands for while the "Nationalist" is quite willing to abandon what their country says it stands for PROVIDED that "there is something in it for them".
 
Just to be sure because I am not that willing to watch idiots say something online, but the that person really state:



The insane person does know that Hitler and that nazi woman Eva Braun were only married for about 40 hours before ending their lives? And that during that time they were in the Fuhrer bunker? And that he could not even have cheated on her even if he wanted to due to the close confines of the Hitler Bunker and the war that was raging above their heads?

That comment he did not cheat once throughout his entire marriage just shows this lady is a nutter or has no inkling of historical knowledge.

Please do not ascribe a scathingly sarcastic retort that the person making it is fully aware is obviously completely unrelated to reality to the wrong person.

If you do, please don't take it as a serious statement of fact.
 
Hitler was a globalist. He had the same ambition as the Democrats, which was a new world order that he(they) would run. The New Green Deal is an appeal to nationalism; US pride in leading a change, that then leads to a new world order; Paris Accord.

Hilter was also a socialist. He changed his party name to the Nationalsozialistischm Deutsche Arbeiterpartei ("National Socialist German Workers' Party", or Nazi Party). Nazi is an acronym for socialism. Fake news and propaganda never goes there, since it need to hide the true long term intent.

Hitler used nationalism as means to an end, which was globalism. He used nationalism to rebuild his war destroyed country, back to first world. Then he used this stepping stone to form a new European Union and beyond. The Democrats are doing the same thing, but with con artists and lawyers. They sell socialism as a utopian vision, even though history shows it regresses into a dictatorship as did Hitler. The Russians; Soviet Union was a good example of socialism and nationalism; Russians, with world wide ambitions.

Trump is doing the opposite of forming of type of nationalism leading to globalism. He breaking global ties and is making the globalists mad, with tariffs, which will make it harder to repair the bridges needed for another Democrat Socialists or Nazi party. What Trump is doing is similar to a caterpillar spinning a cocoon that will isolate the caterpillar, while it undergoes metamorphosis into a butterfly; beautiful but harmless.

It's posts like that that have me despairing of the American educational system.
 
You still defending this Alt Right Bitch?...............Too Funny

Speaking of Bitches, what do you think of Kamala Harris? AOC? Do you defend the two anti-semitic muslims in congress who want to defund homeland security for some reason?
 
Speaking of Bitches, what do you think of Kamala Harris? AOC? Do you defend the two anti-semitic muslims in congress who want to defund homeland security for some reason?

Let me know when they praise Hitler...Until then
 
"Nearly interchangeable" is not the same as "interchangeable".

We have different words so that we can express different shades of meaning.

I have made it clear how I differentiate between "Patriotism" and "Nationalism".

Not in anything that is used to reference definitions of words.

But the "Nationalist" is quite willing to support their country even when they know that what their country is doing is wrong while the "Patriot" is not.

That is because the "Patriot" actually attempts to live by what their country says it stands for while the "Nationalist" is quite willing to abandon what their country says it stands for PROVIDED that "there is something in it for them".

You're just making up your own meanings, ones that don't relate to reality to boot.
 
Not in anything that is used to reference definitions of words.

Only is that I tell you how I use the two different terms to define two different things.

If you don't think that there is any difference between someone who works to change their country when their country is doing things contrary to what their country stands for and someone who is quite willing to forget about what their country stands for when their country is doing things that are contrary to what their country stands for (as long as there is something in it for them), I can't stop you.

I on the other hand will continue to make a distinction between

  1. those who actually stand up for their stated principles; and
  2. those who don't.
 
I guess. But it seems to me that nationalism is either good or bad regardless of hitler.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Well Technically the Swastika wasn't originally a symbol of hate, but let's be honest, are you going to go around wearing one right now in public because it wasn't originally a symbol of hate to try and "rehabilitate" the symbol?
 
Translation: A Black American who won't toe the Democrat plantation line.

So you agree that death camps and oppression are no big deal when one keeps it within their own borders?
 
Oh is that what she was defending? I missed that part of the quote.

Sent from my phone. Instaurare omnia in Christo.

Those were Adolf’s domestic policies designed to, in his warped imagination, “make Germany great again”.

You know, the ones Owens said wouldn’t have been a big deal if he’d kept them within his own borders.
 
Back
Top Bottom