• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rising conservative activist Candace Owens criticized over Hitler comments

Racist and sexism are PC sensitivities?

Funny hearing a trump supporter whine about "racism"...Deal with it....Pathetic to see somebody calling themselves "American" defending somebody praising Hitler
 
She was correct. There are varying definitions of nationalism and not all nationalism is intrinsically bad.

Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk
 
She was correct. There are varying definitions of nationalism and not all nationalism is intrinsically bad.

Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk

Unfortunately the definition of "nationalism" that was the operative on for Herr Hitler WAS "intrinsically bad".
 
You seem to figure it out....Funny to see your Kind reduced to defending this Nationalist Morons

Ghandi was a famous nationalist as well just FYI.
 
Ghandi was a famous nationalist as well just FYI.

Yes. He no longer wanted to be ruled by the colonial British Empire. Quite different than the sort of nationalist nonsense Trump and his supporters are throwing around, and unnecessary by comparison to boot.

You ought to learn some context before you make a fool of yourself.
 
Yes. He no longer wanted to be ruled by the colonial British Empire. Quite different than the sort of nationalist nonsense Trump and his supporters are throwing around, and unnecessary by comparison to boot.

You ought to learn some context before you make a fool of yourself.

Mr. Gandhi appeared to want "a government of __India__, by __Indians__, and for __Indians__".

Mr. Trump appears to want "a government of __everyone__, by __Americans__, and for __(rich) Americans__".

Since BOTH of them appear to have wanted a government of __[fill in the blank]__, by __[fill in the blank]__, and for __[fill in the blank]__" then their positions are obviously identical and Mr. Trump should, naturally, be regarded as "The New Gandhi".

Right?
 
Non sense....You trump supporters comparing Ghandi to trump?.......What a joke

I know that it's picky of me, but who is this "Ghandi" person?

Is everyone - possibly - referring to "Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi" with the "h" between the "d" and the "i" rather than between the "G" and the "a"?
 
Back
Top Bottom