Re: A Huge Climate Change Movement Led By Teenage Girls Is Sweeping Europe.
The trick that appears to fool the left is connected to the nature of the official record. For example, here is question that was asked by a young person.
What is the warmest year on record in human history?
2017 was among the hottest years ever recorded, government scientists reported Thursday. The year was the second-hottest in recorded history, NASA said, while scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported 2017 was the third-warmest they have ever recorded.
If you notice the question, it asked about the hottest year in human history, which is anywhere from 1-2 Million years ago if you believe in evolution and 6000 years ago, if you are a Creationists. On the other hand, the official record only dates back to 1880. The answer is misleading, since the official record, is not the same as in all of human history.
If the answer had been honest science, it would have said, we only have an official record dating back to 1880. Based on that time span, 2017 was among hottest year in the last 140 years of record keeping. Earlier than that, we don't have an official records to say for sure.
This dishonest answer caters to the narrative. Science is supposed to be exact and by the book. When they fail to clarify the time limits of the data, and their data claims, they participate in politics for funding.
As another example, the modern Olympics began in 1896. if we say the Olympic record was broken, yesterday, this only includes the official record starting from 1896. It has nothing to do with the original Olympics, or all of human history before 1896. We do not have records before that, so these will not count, since we cannot verify anything before 1896.
If the same young person asked who was the fastest human in all of history, if we wished to run a narrative, we would say the fastest man ever recorded in the 100 meters, was Jamaica's Usain Bolt in 2009 at 9.58 seconds. The young person, would assume I just answered his question, so he would then tell his friends Bolt was the fastest human of all time. This leads to al type of biological speculation that modern humans are more advanced.
The left falls for this data scam connected to official records. The data is good, but the context of the official record is never clarified, to mean only based on data collected since 1880. Nothing before 1880 is included, as official.
Say a drug manufacturer wanted to use this limitation of data scam to get a new drug to market. They run tests for two years, which are not good. One day they get better results. All they need to do is throw out all the previous data and start the official record when the good data starts. Then they can say, based on the official records we have, this drug is the best of all time. All the science behind this data claim can be official, but it will still mislead, those who do not question what the official record means.
