• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Doesn’t Give Yes or No Answer When by Judge Jeniene if He’s a Russian Asset

What I don’t understand about the whole Russia thing is why Trump doesn’t display more outrage at what the Russians did in interfering with our election. What does he lose by saying he’s angry and there will be hell to pay if they try it again?

Because he obviously conspired with the Russians to affect the 2016 election. And the hammer's about to drop on that.
 
So because he didn't state explicitly "yes" or "no" he didn't give a straight answer? If someone says “I think it's the most insulting thing I've ever been asked." I'd call that a pretty straightforward answer of HELL NO. And most people would take it as such. People don't think something is insulting if they agree with it.

I have to agree with Kal'stang: the president meant 'hell no'.

I must also disclose that I think the president is lying.
 
Max Boot wrote an article for the Washington Post this afternoon, titled "Here are 18 reasons Trump could be a Russian asset".
I've condensed it to some degree but you can read it in its entirety:

https://wapo.st/2FpqV5u?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.9d9d380f5e5a

Here is some of the evidence suggesting “Individual 1” could be a Russian “asset”:


— From 2003 to 2017, people from the former USSR made 86 all-cash purchases — a red flag of potential money laundering -- of Trump properties, totaling $109 million.

— In 2010, the private-wealth division of Deutsche Bank also loaned him hundreds of millions of dollars during the same period it was laundering billions in Russian money. ‘Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets,’ said Donald Jr. in 2008.

— The Russians interfered in the 2016 U.S. election to help elect Trump president. This has been verified by the CIA, FBI, NSA and Director of National Intelligence.

— Trump encouraged the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails on July 27, 2016 (“Russia, if you’re listening”), on the very day that Russian intelligence hackers tried to attack Clinton’s personal and campaign servers.

— There were, according to the Moscow Project, “101 contacts between Trump’s team and Russia linked operatives,” and “the Trump team tried to cover up every single one of them.”

— The Trump campaign was full of individuals, such as Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates and Michael Flynn, with suspiciously close links to Moscow.

— Manafort, who ran the Trump campaign for free and was heavily in debt to a Russian oligarch, now admits to offering his Russian business partner, who is suspected of links to Russian intelligence, polling data that could have been used to target the Russian social media campaign on behalf of Trump.

— Trump associate Roger Stone, who was in contact with Russian conduit WikiLeaks, reportedly knew in advance that the Russians had hacked Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails.

— Once in office, Trump fired Comey to stop the investigation of the “Russia thing” — and then bragged about having done so to the Russian ambassador and foreign minister while also sharing with them top-secret information.

— Trump has refused to consistently acknowledge that Russia interfered in the U.S. election or mobilize a government-wide effort to stop future interference. He has accepted Putin’s protestations that the Russians did not meddle in the election over the “high confidence” assessment of the U.S. intelligence community that they did.

— Like no previous president, Trump attacks and undermines the Justice Department and the FBI (“a cancer in our country”) — two institutions that stand on the front lines of combatting Russian espionage and influence operations in the United States.

— Again, like no previous president, Trump attacks and undermines the European Union and NATO — he has suggested that France should leave the E.U. and that the United States should leave NATO, reportedly saying, “NATO is as bad as NAFTA.” The E.U. and NATO are the two major obstacles to Russian designs in Europe.

— Trump supports populist, pro-Russian leaders in Europe, such as Viktor Orban in Hungary and Marine Le Pen in France, just as the Russians do.

— Trump has praised Putin (“a strong leader”) while trashing just about everyone else from grade-B Hollywood celebrities to leaders of allied nations. Trump even praised Putin for expelling U.S. diplomats and, notwithstanding instruction from his aides (“DO NOT CONGRATULATE”), congratulated Putin on winning a rigged reelection.

— Trump was utterly supine in his meetings with Putin, principally in Hamburg and Helsinki. Even more suspicious, according to a Post article on Saturday, Trump “has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with . . . Putin, including on at least one occasion taking possession of the notes of his own interpreter and instructing the linguist not to discuss what had transpired with other administration officials . . .

— Trump defends the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and repeats other pro-Russian talking points.

— Trump is pulling U.S. troops out of Syria, handing that country to Russia and its ally Iran.

— Trump has effectively done nothing in response to the Russian attack on Ukrainian ships in international waters, thereby encouraging greater Russian aggression.

— Trump is sowing chaos in the government, most recently with a record-breaking partial government shutdown and “acting” appointees in key posts such as the Defense Department and Justice Department, thus furthering a Russian objective of undermining its chief adversary.

"looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck. It's a duck"

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
I know why he didn't give a firm 'no' answer, it's because he's being taped and that 'no' answer could possibly be used in court against him. Instead of an adamant denial, which he didn't do, he gave an obscure answer of 'how insulting' the question was.

I dont think he is capable of that kind of strategic thinking
 
I'm not the one that considers it insulting. Trump does. If you have a question that you think is valid does that mean you think that the question is insulting? What is and isn't insulting is subjective. Either way it is not unheard of for or uncommon for someone to say that a question that they were asked is insulting and the person asking the question to accept that as a "no". Something which I'm sure you're quite aware of. Anyone that claims otherwise is lying.

He could be insulted that anyone dared question anything he's done.
 
What I don’t understand about the whole Russia thing is why Trump doesn’t display more outrage at what the Russians did in interfering with our election. What does he lose by saying he’s angry and there will be hell to pay if they try it again?

Legitimacy.
 
No. He doesnt mention it because he doesnt want to tarnish his victory. You guys will never understand Trump.

That's a possibility. He doesn't mind getting 'caught' as much as he minds getting 'caught out'.

Either way he's lying.
 
That's a possibility. He doesn't mind getting 'caught' as much as he minds getting 'caught out'.

Either way he's lying.

No hes not. He not an agent of the Russians. Thats just stupid.
 
:roll: Do you really think it matters to me who asked him the question? His answer was simple. Such a question is insulting. In MOST non-partisan circles such an answer is an obvious "no".

Then why didn't he say no? It's not like he doesn't know how to lie. It is a valid question and an FBI investigation was started because of it. He said no to the "pee tapes" question and that was pretty insulting.
 
No hes not. He not an agent of the Russians. Thats just stupid.

Not an agent agent, as in getting a paycheck and reporting to a handler. That is indeed stupid. But acting as an agent in the sense that he is putting the interests of a foreign power first. As preposterous and ahem, 'unpresidented' as it sounds, that's what the evidence points to.
 
S
Because he obviously conspired with the Russians to affect the 2016 election. And the hammer's about to drop on that.

Perhaps. But in the meantime, before this stuff came out, he could have at least prevented to be concerned. Would have been good politics for him if he assumed/hoped that things like the latest info would stay hidden.
 
Back
Top Bottom