jonny5
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2012
- Messages
- 27,581
- Reaction score
- 4,664
- Location
- Republic of Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
South Carolina ceded all right to the land when they agreed to allow the fort to be built......well before they decided to try to leave the Union to protect their precious slavery. There are no "do-overs"; you don't get to seize by force what you already gave away just because you had second thoughts years down the line. Federal property does not magically become part of another "country" even when that "country" decided it is independent.....oh, and by the way, no one else recognized the south as an independent country.
According to the law, the only land the govt can own is 10 square miles for the seat. Everything else is not theirs and at best the states allow the federal govt to use it. The union was asked to leave Fort Sumter, and no longer had a right or reason to be there. Its clearly within the boundaries of South Carolina. The same would go for any British forts on the colonies land. SC even offered to pay the union, but they wanted war. Lincoln wanted to preserve the union at any cost, including killing the death of nearly a million people on both sides.