• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chief Justice John Roberts Orders New Investigation into Brett Kavanaugh

Just fake news.
Fox was not around then either.

Fox was not around in 1993 but it was when the Lewinsky scandal and the perjury matters were fresh.

and where do you think I meant only Fox news
 
I am not militant on abortion.

I like about 70 percent of the U.S. population support Roe vs Wade, including the rights of states to proscribe ( ban abortions ) after viability except in the extreme cases where the life or irreparable damage to a major bodiliy function would occur ( such as stroke, heart attack , paralysis from the waist down, kidney or liver damage etc.)

In all of the U.S. there are about 100 of those cases a year.

I do not firmly support gun control , I want exsisting gun laws enforced.
I am a fiscal conservative.
I am for tax cuts for middle class and poor.

Your gun control stance is for more legislation.
Your fiscal stance is more spending.
You were against the tax cuts recently passed.

Try again.
 
I am quite sure all charges will be dismissed.

Chief Justice John Roberts said he transferred the judicial misconduct complaints to the Judicial Council of the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals for further review.

That court is headed by Judge Tymkovich. “Judge Tymkovich can handle the complaints himself, dismiss them or appoint a special committee to examine them.”

By the way ( no surprise here I might add )



Read more

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/10/poli...l-misconduct-john-roberts-transfer/index.html

So Roberts didn't order an investigation as per the OP, but sent it along to the courts.

Isn't that the proper steps? I don't SCOTUS has the authority to order an investigation.
 
Your gun control stance is for more legislation.
Your fiscal stance is more spending.
You were against the tax cuts recently passed.

Try again.

I changed my my mind on gun laws.
I only want exsisting gun laws enforced.

Post 65

Than let us enforce them. We have to keep better records from both military and law enforcement into one shared data base of every person who has lost their right to own a firearm.



From post 90

If they enforced properly the shooter who killed all those families attending church in Texas a few months ago never would have been able to buy a gun legally.


The Texas Church Shooter Should Have Been Legally Barred From Owning Guns



https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...uld-have-been-legally-barred-from-owning-guns

https://www.debatepolitics.com/search.php?searchid=8249062
 
Last edited:
Chief Justice John Roberts Orders New Investigation into Brett Kavanaugh

If I read the article correctly.....Justice Roberts didn't order any new investigation; he simply referred complaints to another judicial review court.
 
...
Your fiscal stance is more spending.
You were against the tax cuts recently passed.

Try again.


Bologna.

I am not for more spending.
When Senator Collins announced that the tax cuts would help the middle class I supported the tax cuts.
 
So Roberts want someone investigated who doesnt need investigating?

as i told you there is no investigation. Roberts basically shoved it off and the 10th circuit court ethics panel has no
jurisdiction over the SCOTUS.

if you would have read what i posted you would have known this by now.
 
as i told you there is no investigation. Roberts basically shoved it off and the 10th circuit court ethics panel has no
jurisdiction over the SCOTUS.

if you would have read what i posted you would have known this by now.

Judge Henderson dismissed some of the complaints made against Judge Kavanaugh as frivolous. But she concluded that more than a dozen complaints were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel and that they should not be handled by Judge Kavanaugh’s fellow judges in the D.C. Circuit. She referred them to Chief Justice Roberts, who has now referred them to the 10th Circuit.

The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens also stated that Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated bias and is “not fit for the Supreme Court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work.
 
I know.
I gave him a chance to crawl out from under it but he hasn't yet.

The bigger the rock you crawl under, the harder to get out. It will probably be a while.
 
Watch your mouth. My first car was a 2 door Ford. A 1968 Galaxy 500.

Mine was a 1969 Chevy Caprice with a 396 and a qudrajet four barrel and an A/C that on a hot humid day would blow snow all the way to the rear window.
 
Judge Henderson dismissed some of the complaints made against Judge Kavanaugh as frivolous. But she concluded that more than a dozen complaints were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel and that they should not be handled by Judge Kavanaugh’s fellow judges in the D.C. Circuit. She referred them to Chief Justice Roberts, who has now referred them to the 10th Circuit.

The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens also stated that Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated bias and is “not fit for the Supreme Court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work.

The opinions of 2400 leftist legal perfessors have determined based on nothing is now a legal basis?
 
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/ch...s-new-investigation-brett-kavanaugh-fox-news/



So now Republican nominated John Roberts himself is ordering a further investigation into Kavanaugh. What exactly does this **** head need to do to convince Republicans he's bad news and shouldn't be on the court? How exactly is it that more than a dozen misconduct complaints weren't caught in the initial vetting of Kavanaugh?

unconfirmed sources say Kavanaugh was spotted buying Red Solo Cups @ Wal Mart... :2wave:
 
Why in the world this thread has gone 9 pages is beyond me. The title is obviously a lie. Rawstory lies outright and by omission often, why anybody reads this trash is, again, beyond me. Rawstory seems to rely on their readership being low-information and lacking some basic reading comprehension skills.
 
Judge Henderson dismissed some of the complaints made against Judge Kavanaugh as frivolous. But she concluded that more than a dozen complaints were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel and that they should not be handled by Judge Kavanaugh’s fellow judges in the D.C. Circuit. She referred them to Chief Justice Roberts, who has now referred them to the 10th Circuit.

The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens also stated that Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated bias and is “not fit for the Supreme Court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work.

Since you didn't read it before you can read it again.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/10/eth...ett-kavanaugh-have-not-been-resolved-yet.html

The chief judge on the D.C. appeals court, Merrick Garland, whom President Barack Obama nominated to the Supreme Court in 2016, recused himself from reviewing those complaints. After his recusal, Karen Henderson, another judge on the D.C. appeals court, then passed them on to Roberts, The Washington Post reported earlier this month.

It is unclear what the 10th Circuit will do with the complaints. Kavanaugh, as a Supreme Court justice, is not subject to the lower court's judicial misconduct procedures.

Now your only failure at this point is i will consider you misinformed.
after this though anything else i will consider that you are being obtuse on purpose.


Kavanaugh is a SCJ now. the 10th has 0 review of him.
Roberts took the nonsense and threw it into a black hole that it will never come out of is what he did.
why?

he is a chief justice he doesn't have time for petty complaints against someone because a bunch of political hacks don't like him.
he is no going to get the SCOTUS caught up in the liberal dumbassery.
 
The bigger the rock you crawl under, the harder to get out. It will probably be a while.

they are so far buried they can see china.
 
Nice ride.

My 2nd car was a two-door Ford. 1976 Pinto Station Wagon. :lamo

Got my cherry popped in a 2 door '70 Ford Maverick.

But it wasn't me! That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
 
So now Republican nominated John Roberts himself is ordering a further investigation into Kavanaugh.

Well there's a divide not much will overcome on that bench. Right out of the gate.

They arent gonna be bffs.
 
unconfirmed sources say Kavanaugh was spotted buying Red Solo Cups @ Wal Mart... :2wave:

lets have a party
 
Bologna.

I am not for more spending.
When Senator Collins announced that the tax cuts would help the middle class I supported the tax cuts.

I don't think you ever posted any support for Trump's tax plan. But you aren't refuting the other claims.
 
Back
Top Bottom