• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump rallies supporters in Iowa, crowd chants "Lock her up!" about Feinstein

SCrider said:
Have you ever seen an American president act like this? Calling Americans evil and the other crap he spews daily?
Click to expand...

When has he called Americans evil? Legit question.
 
Ikari said:
It's just the standard hyperpartisan propaganda and hysterics that our system has devolved into. It's bad when the other side does it, but it's fine when your side does it. And if people question your side doing it, then you can just say but...but...but....the other side.

Welcome to bottom-of-the-barrel politics.
Click to expand...

It's really annoying that so many people are falling for all of it, and cant see their own hyper partisanship. It's very rare to find a person who thinks for themselves, and can recognise how screed up our national dialogue is.
 
GDViking said:
To make matters worse trump is deregulating ethanol in order to try to by back voters, particularly Iowa midterm voters.

It really won't do anything for them in the long run but many will buy it...
Click to expand...

They are eager to buy Trump's newest version of snake oil. It's easier than admitting they were wrong the first time.
 
GDViking said:
Really, for what?
Click to expand...

Behavior unbecoming along with some other things that would require
censuring.

that is why it needs to be investigated.
 
SCrider said:
Background checks at not the same as a criminal investigation.
Click to expand...

But...but...this is a job interview!

You people sure as hell want to have your cake and eat it, too.
 
nota bene said:
Maybe "Lock her up!" is easier to say in a chant than "Investigate her now!"?
Click to expand...

Probably, but why no presumption of innocence for her? You guys were all concerned about it for Kavanaugh.
 
ludin said:
Behavior unbecoming along with some other things that would require
censuring.

that is why it needs to be investigated.
Click to expand...

Being censured by the Senate does not come with a jail sentence.

You just want to put all the liberals in prison for disagreeing with the God-Emperor.
 
SCrider said:
Have you ever seen an American president act like this? Calling Americans evil and the other crap he spews daily?
Click to expand...

It's Trump, so it's OK. If you're mean to him, you need to learn to be civil and you're being intolerant. Try to keep up.
 
Hmm. Aren't his supporters still waiting for Hillary Clinton to be locked up? Heck, there hasn't even been an investigation launched against Clinton despite Trump having originally said he would do so.

 
rocket88 said:
Being censured by the Senate does not come with a jail sentence.

You just want to put all the liberals in prison for disagreeing with the God-Emperor.
Click to expand...

I never said anything about a jail sentence did i?

your strawman is blowing -> you might want to go chase it for next time.
 
SCrider said:
Background checks at not the same as a criminal investigation.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Since Kavanaugh wasn't accused of a federal crime, the FBI has no jurisdiction. The local police could investigate, but they need someone to file a complaint, but that didn't happen. All that was left then was for the expanded background check.
 
ludin said:
I never said anything about a jail sentence did i?

your strawman is blowing -> you might want to go chase it for next time.
Click to expand...

You said that was a reason to "lock her up." Locking someone up implies going to jail.
 
rocket88 said:
You said that was a reason to "lock her up." Locking someone up implies going to jail.
Click to expand...

Nope checked all my posts in this thread no where did i say lock her up.
you are either mistaken me for someone else or need to go get your other strawman.
 
Moon said:
Agreed. Since Kavanaugh wasn't accused of a federal crime, the FBI has no jurisdiction. The local police could investigate, but they need someone to file a complaint, but that didn't happen. All that was left then was for the expanded background check.
Click to expand...

Which begs the question, why didn't Ford file a criminal complaint with the police after she spoke in front of the entire country claiming attempted rape?
 
SCrider said:
Just the other day during a speech to police chiefs.
Click to expand...

trump has divided the country...No doubt he could call for political opponents , celebrities , media personal to be arrested and executed...His mob of angry white people would cheer
 
apdst said:
But...but...this is a job interview!

You people sure as hell want to have your cake and eat it, too.
Click to expand...

What are you gripping about?
 
trixare4kids said:
Which begs the question, why didn't Ford file a criminal complaint with the police after she spoke in front of the entire country claiming attempted rape?
Click to expand...
I won't speculate, but I'm sure she has her reasons.
 
SheWolf said:
It's really annoying that so many people are falling for all of it, and cant see their own hyper partisanship. It's very rare to find a person who thinks for themselves, and can recognise how screed up our national dialogue is.
Click to expand...

It's deflection of responsibility. People don't want to actually think about the problem or how to fix it. It's easier to point fingers and pretend that it's just the other side at fault. That way, they don't actually have to do anything.
 
rocket88 said:
Probably, but why no presumption of innocence for her? You guys were all concerned about it for Kavanaugh.
Click to expand...

How many freaking times do I have to point out that I am not a guy and also not "you guys," just one person? :doh

There is a reason to investigate Feinstein: She had the letter. This isn't an accusation; it's a fact. There is no he said/she said; she had the letter, and even her Dem colleagues on the Judiciary Committee were frustrated that she didn't clue them in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom