Christine Blasey Ford's life 'turned upside down' after accusing Kavanaugh

Casca XV said:

Funny how anytime a Leftist gets caught in obvious total Bull S**T lies like this they start claiming to be receiving "Death Threats." But when those cases are investigated and solved at least 90% of the time the so called "Death Threats" are also total BS.

Click to expand...

Cool. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

Kavanaugh and his family are also receiving threats. These kinds of responses to political debates are not Christian, they are ungodly. This country is suffering from a growing attitude of ungodliness across the entire land.

marke said:

Kavanaugh and his family are also receiving threats. These kinds of responses to political debates are not Christian, they are ungodly. This country is suffering from a growing attitude of ungodliness across the entire land.

Click to expand...

If that's true - if his family is being terrorized then I hope the people doing the terrorizing are caught and thrown in jail.

lurchadams said:

If that's true - if his family is being terrorized then I hope the people doing the terrorizing are caught and thrown in jail.

Click to expand...

Exactly.

Barnacle said:

Like I said "... And don't nobody say here I support terrorizing people ..." ...

Click to expand...

you then went on to justify that she brought it on herself. you need to read your post in full.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

Some comments...

1. People have always had their opinions...even crazy or dangerous people. With things like social media and the multimedia echo chamber, it's easier for people to express their opinions. The crazy or dangerous people have a greater opportunity to express themselves as well. That means more people will threaten and harass those they don't like. Nobody should be surprised that this will happen. Nobody can stop the threats and harassment, except after the fact.

2. Ford, as I understand it, didn't choose to go public. She did reach out to two members of Congress, but she asked them to keep her anonymous. That indicates that she was aware of the possibility of threats and harassment. So the question, in my opinion, should be who outed her? From what I understand, it was Feinstein or her staff. Why isn't anyone blaming Feinstein?

3. On the other hand, perhaps Ford gave Feinstein permission. If that's the case, then Ford has no one to blame for the threats and harassment except herself.

Before I posted this comment and after I wrote it, I actually went and read the other comments in the thread. Maybe I should have done that first, eh? LOL!! Anyway, here are some more comments from me...

1. I agree that people who threaten or harass should be prosecuted...if possible...but, as I said above that's after the fact.

2. Such threats and harassment isn't something one Party or the other does. It's something crazy or dangerous people do. Quit throwing around blame.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

This kind of stuff is disgusting no matter who it happens to. Neither of these parties should be receiving death threats, and I condemn all who do, but such is humanity.

TheGoverness said:

This kind of stuff is disgusting no matter who it happens to. Neither of these parties should be receiving death threats, and I condemn all who do, but such is humanity.

Click to expand...

such is what happens when as a society we reject logic and reason for pure emotional outrage at everything.

Barnacle said:

Cry me a river.

Pffft ...

And don't nobody say here I support terrorizing people just because I don't feel sympathy for that woman and the position she put herself in by coming out with a totally fabricated story.
If she had a convincing story to tell, she wouldn't need 2 high-priced lawyers that are being paid by someone else and she would jump at the chance of getting a senate hearing.

again ... pfft ... get over it.

Kavanaughs have to get over the threads they are receiving and so too has the Trump administration.

By the way, she can thank Feinstein for the position she is in. 2 x POS. (spit)

Click to expand...

How do you know it's fabricated?? How do you know 100% for certain she's lying?? She wants an FBI investigation. Kavanaugh doesn't?? If he were innocent, why wouldn't he??

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

It is a shame that there are these kinds of dickheads in The United States, on both sides. ATIFA and the resistatards on the Left are equal dickheads.

Ford shouldn't be subjected to this kind of treatment (if it's true) no matter how big-a-lie she telling, in attempt to ruin Brett Kavanaugh's life and career

jghiretire said:

How do you know it's fabricated?? How do you know 100% for certain she's lying?? She wants an FBI investigation. Kavanaugh doesn't?? If he were innocent, why wouldn't he??

Click to expand...

How do you know it's not fabricated? How do you know 100% for certain she's telling the truth?

What she wants is irrelevant, as the FBI will not investigate a BS story.

By the way, I don't believe it is and never has been "what she wants" ... ha ha ha.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

No, only if they are Republicans. Just ask Maxine Waters.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

She probably should have reconsidered lying about someone and trying to ruin their life because she didn't like their politics.

jmotivator said:

She probably should have reconsidered lying about someone and trying to ruin their life because she didn't like their politics.

Click to expand...

Another day, another death threat supported by jmotivator.

Fine people on both sides....such a clutch phrase.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats

I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

There are so many questionable activities in this situation and so many underhanded tactics used by leading democrats, that it's difficult not to consider that the threats may be coming from liberals - what better way to garner support for a constituent?

Mach said:

Another day, another death threat supported by jmotivator.

Fine people on both sides....such a clutch phrase.

Click to expand...

Not supporting death threats. I don't automatically believe that there were death threats to begin with.

That is one thing she should be able to provide as evidence. Show me the death threats, show me the police reports. If they exist then track down those who made them and throw the book at them.

I just have a hard time believing anything the woman says at this point... and I'm certainly not going to take her word for it.

lurchadams said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accuser-threats



I see complaints from my right wing brothers and sisters on DP all the time about how the "intolerant left" tries to "silence and harrass people with whom they disagree". What say y'all about this?

Here's a woman who has had her and her family chased out of her home and is receiving death threats, as did several of the women who came forward to accuse judge roy moore. When I it ok to terrorize people, only if they're democrats, right?

Click to expand...

No, it's not okay, and anyone doing so should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Just like the people sending death threats to Kavanaugh and his family.

She should report these death threats to the proper authorities -as she should have her supposed assault - and let them investigate.

Moderate Right said:

No, only if they are Republicans. Just ask Maxine Waters.

Click to expand...

Oooh, got a point there!

jmotivator said:

She probably should have reconsidered lying about someone and trying to ruin their life because she didn't like their politics.

Click to expand...

Whatever, dude. Come back when you'd like to have a serious debate.

Big Ed said:

There are so many questionable activities in this situation and so many underhanded tactics used by leading democrats, that it's difficult not to consider that the threats may be coming from liberals - what better way to garner support for a constituent?

Click to expand...

There have been so many underhanded tactics used by the GOP, starting with the boxing out of Merrick Garland in order to stack the SCOTUS with right-wing ideologs totally out of touch with the needs of the common American and culminating with the latest cruel attacks on Kavanagh's accuser. This is why the GOP is losing support and why at least the house will swing back to the Dems in 2018.

Gondwanaland said:

No, it's not okay, and anyone doing so should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Just like the people sending death threats to Kavanaugh and his family.

She should report these death threats to the proper authorities -as she should have her supposed assault - and let them investigate.

Click to expand...

Yep the bolded is the right-wing response to any alleged accuser of someone that threatens their stranglehold on their reigns of power. Attack the accuser. Hence my motivation for starting this thread.

lurchadams said:

Yep the bolded is the right-wing response to any alleged accuser of someone that threatens their stranglehold on their reigns of power. Attack the accuser. Hence my motivation for starting this thread.

Click to expand...

I didn't attack her. I stated a fact that she should have reported her supposed assault back when an investigation could have been done. As of now, it's over 30 years old and all that exists is her word, which has changed in its story from just 6 years ago, and also contains none of the important details like where it happened or when (not even the year it happened!)..... and now all 4 of the people she said were there at the party including one of her own friends do not remember such a party ever occurring.


Maybe she did get assaulted by Kavanaugh and everyone else is lying.

Maybe she didn't get assaulted and completely made the story up.

Maybe she was in such a drunken state that she thought someone had assaulted her when they didn't.

Maybe her psychological therapist caused her brain to create false memories much as many psychologists did during the Satanic Day Care Panic.

Maybe she was assaulted at one of the many drunken parties she went to (per her yearbook, the gals went to blackout drunk parties quite often) and details of them blurred together resulting in a misidentification of Kavanaugh.

There are all sorts of possibilities. Yet there is not any evidence for determining which is the case because she can't seem to provide any concrete details and the people she says were there all say they weren't.

Gondwanaland said:

I didn't attack her. I stated a fact that she should have reported her supposed assault back when an investigation could have been done. As of now, it's over 30 years old and all that exists is her word, which has changed in its story from just 6 years ago, and also contains none of the important details like where it happened or when (not even the year it happened!)..... and now all 4 of the people she said were there at the party including one of her own friends do not remember such a party ever occurring.


Maybe she did get assaulted by Kavanaugh and everyone else is lying.

Maybe she didn't get assaulted and completely made the story up.

Maybe she was in such a drunken state that she thought someone had assaulted her when they didn't.

Maybe she was assaulted at one of the many drunken parties she went to (per her yearbook, the gals went to blackout drunk parties quite often) and details of them blurred together resulting in a misidentification of Kavanaugh.

There are all sorts of possibilities. Yet there is not any evidence for determining which is the case because she can't seem to provide any concrete details and the people she says were there all say they weren't.

Click to expand...

I just read an article about a woman that forgot the date of her miscarriage. You want to hold a woman responsible for forgetting some of the the details of something very traumatic. Until something this traumatic happens to either us or someone we love, we should withhold judgement on when someone should come forward and what she should remember.

lurchadams said:

I just read an article about a woman that forgot the date of her miscarriage. You want to hold a woman responsible for forgetting some of the the details of something very traumatic. Until something this traumatic happens to either us or someone we love, we should withhold judgement on when someone should come forward and what she should remember.

Click to expand...

She can't even remember the YEAR it happened. Or where it happened. Etc.. She has nothing to go on as far as any sort of investigation goes. All she has is her word, and that has changed its story since she first told the tale, and none of the people she says were there can remember such a party.

Again, Maybe she did get assaulted by Kavanaugh and everyone else is lying.

Maybe she didn't get assaulted and completely made the story up.

Maybe she was in such a drunken state that she thought someone had assaulted her when they didn't.

Maybe she was assaulted at one of the many drunken parties she went to (per her yearbook, the gals went to blackout drunk parties quite often) and details of them blurred together resulting in a misidentification of Kavanaugh.

There are all sorts of possibilities. Yet there is not any evidence for determining which is the case because she can't seem to provide any concrete details and the people she says were there all say they weren't.


We can't just condemn Kavanaugh as guilty based just on someone's word of a vaguely remembered event that happened 30 years ago if it did happen. That's not how things work, otherwise I get to go and claim that the next Democrat nominee for president molested me when they were a teenager, and you have to reject them based solely on my vague word.

Until something this traumatic happens to either us or someone we love, we should withhold judgement on when someone should come forward and what she should remember.

Click to expand...

My wife was raped when she was 13. She and her parents reported it to the police, and she also remembers it in excruciating detail - time, place, person - and still has nightmares about it even 40 years later. So spare me this nonsense.

Gondwanaland said:

She can't even remember the YEAR it happened. Or where it happened. Etc.. She has nothing to go on as far as any sort of investigation goes. All she has is her word, and that has changed its story since she first told the tale, and none of the people she says were there can remember such a party.

Again, Maybe she did get assaulted by Kavanaugh and everyone else is lying.

Maybe she didn't get assaulted and completely made the story up.

Maybe she was in such a drunken state that she thought someone had assaulted her when they didn't.

Maybe she was assaulted at one of the many drunken parties she went to (per her yearbook, the gals went to blackout drunk parties quite often) and details of them blurred together resulting in a misidentification of Kavanaugh.

There are all sorts of possibilities. Yet there is not any evidence for determining which is the case because she can't seem to provide any concrete details and the people she says were there all say they weren't.


We can't just condemn Kavanaugh as guilty based just on someone's word of a vaguely remembered event that happened 30 years ago if it did happen. That's not how things work, otherwise I get to go and claim that the next Democrat nominee for president molested me when they were a teenager, and you have to reject them based solely on my vague word.

Click to expand...

I'm not condemning anyone. All I'm saying is that until I'm sexually assaulted I'm not going to judge anyone else's timeline for reporting it for for their recollection or lack thereof of specific details.