• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Accuser's schoolmate says she recalls hearing of alleged Kavanaugh incident

Each of the participants attended gender specific schools......Hilton Arms all female/Georgetown Prep all male.

And never the twain shall meet, except weekly and/or daily for PARTYYY!!
 
I doubt this coverage is hurting his sales.

I'd like to read his book but I don't want to buy it. Maybe the local library will have a copy.
 
I don't why, but this woman's statements about believing Ford's accusation, even though she wasn't a friend nor was she there at the alleged incident, reminds me of when people say Chick Fil-A won't serve homosexuals because they don't believe in homosexual marriage. It's just dumb and no truth to the claim. The ONLY thing that is true in this entire story is both Kavanaugh and Ford went to the same school (like the only thing that was true about Chick Fil-A was the CEO is against homosexual marriage, but the stores serve anyone regardless of sexual orientation or beliefs). Beyond that, there is no evidence to the accusation. Accepting it as absolute truth with nothing to back it up can be dangerous. That would mean ANYONE can accuse someone else of ANYTHING because they don't like them or want something. Believe it or not, just as many women lie just like what many men that lie. The degree is just as bad, no more nor less. Gender has no role in actually lying.

I find her claim she remembers hearing a rumor about the assault interesting. Her claim she believes Ford, however, doesn’t really carry any weight with me since they weren’t even friends.
 
I'd like to read his book but I don't want to buy it. Maybe the local library will have a copy.

I, for one, do not have to read his book to know the attitude that comes with spoiled rich brats raised in silk diapers feeling their entitlement and that the rules do not apply to them because they are special by virtue of somebody else money . It is well known to me and reading a book will not teach me anything new.
 
I am saying this is all out war between the two sides and Garland is prime evidence of that. So anything they get in return is simply to be expected.

So was Garland ambushed at the 11th hour and accused anonymously of committing a sexual crime?
 
In other words, another lie from Ford's side.

I don't know that this is a lie, only that her husband's claim is at variance with the therapist's notes.
 
I don't know that this is a lie, only that her husband's claim is at variance with the therapist's notes.

And Drs do make mistakes.
 
So was Garland ambushed at the 11th hour and accused anonymously of committing a sexual crime?

Kinda hard for that to happen.
 
Possible kavanaugh thought it was funny....or his drunken side kick. Ya know that famous "locker room talk" which the right claims is so very "normal"?

It's also possible that what is claimed never happened. Kavanaugh appears very eager to meet with the Committee on Monday...his accuser not so much and after saying she was. ;)
 
And Drs do make mistakes.

So how often, JANFU, are therapists' notes incorrect? And does this depend on whether they're handwritten, dictated/transcribed/or written using custom software?
 
So how often, JANFU, are therapists' notes incorrect? And does this depend on whether they're handwritten, dictated/transcribed/or written using custom software?

Based upon past experience,involved with 3 Military Investigations, all tape recorded, sent for transcribing there were numerous mistakes. How about you?
 
Last edited:
It's also possible that what is claimed never happened. Kavanaugh appears very eager to meet with the Committee on Monday...his accuser not so much and after saying she was. ;)

Well can't say I blame her, as many of the majority of the Committee have already proclaimed her a liar, and all he has to do is sit there and say I didn't do it!! She will have her life dissected by partisan politicians on TV. Can't imagine her wanting a simple thing like an investigation done before hand. The FBI investigated Clarence Thomas in 3 days.

But that is different than your statement that if anyone else knew, she must have told, and therefore is a liar. Any number of people could have told.
 
This scenario wouldn't be considered "getting lucky" by any imagination but, there were other girls at the party who may have assumed what went on. Girls talk just as nasty as guys, BTW.

How do we know she is even talking about the same party?
 
Well can't say I blame her, as many of the majority of the Committee have already proclaimed her a liar, and all he has to do is sit there and say I didn't do it!! She will have her life dissected by partisan politicians on TV. Can't imagine her wanting a simple thing like an investigation done before hand. The FBI investigated Clarence Thomas in 3 days.

But that is different than your statement that if anyone else knew, she must have told, and therefore is a liar. Any number of people could have told.

She has been offered a private hearing, but you cant come out and jump directly into the hottest political fray in the country and expect to be treated like a newborn. And why arent you concerned about Kavenaugh? He is being called a liar and a rapist and having his good reputation dragged through the mud by a person who refuses to come forward and confront him directly.
 
I find her claim she remembers hearing a rumor about the assault interesting. Her claim she believes Ford, however, doesn’t really carry any weight with me since they weren’t even friends.

And who remembers a rumor like that 36 years later?
 
Based upon past experience,involved with 3 Military Investigations, all tape recorded, sent for transcribing there were numerous mistakes. How about you?

Well, I suppose there is not much difference between a therapist in a group or private practice and a military clerk doing the writing/word-processing, but there is a difference between transcribing audio and entering data into a software program.

As for the personal question, I'm the exact wrong person to ask because of how I earn my living. I worked as a temp while in grad school and did type up a lot of dictation (ah, the good old days of a floor pedal!), but I'm generally the last edit before submission/publication.
 
Well can't say I blame her, as many of the majority of the Committee have already proclaimed her a liar, and all he has to do is sit there and say I didn't do it!! She will have her life dissected by partisan politicians on TV. Can't imagine her wanting a simple thing like an investigation done before hand. The FBI investigated Clarence Thomas in 3 days.

But that is different than your statement that if anyone else knew, she must have told, and therefore is a liar. Any number of people could have told.

Which members of the Judiciary Committee have called Ford a liar? I've missed this.
 
Well can't say I blame her, as many of the majority of the Committee have already proclaimed her a liar, and all he has to do is sit there and say I didn't do it!! She will have her life dissected by partisan politicians on TV. Can't imagine her wanting a simple thing like an investigation done before hand. The FBI investigated Clarence Thomas in 3 days.

But that is different than your statement that if anyone else knew, she must have told, and therefore is a liar. Any number of people could have told.

Ford said she never told anyone until her marriage counseling in 2012.
 
Well can't say I blame her, as many of the majority of the Committee have already proclaimed her a liar

Really? "many of the majority"? Tell me...exactly how many? Heck, can you even tell me what the number is that makes up the "majority"?

It's not that I'm calling you a liar, you understand. I just want to get some facts here.
 
I don't why, but this woman's statements about believing Ford's accusation, even though she wasn't a friend nor was she there at the alleged incident, reminds me of when people say Chick Fil-A won't serve homosexuals because they don't believe in homosexual marriage. It's just dumb and no truth to the claim. The ONLY thing that is true in this entire story is both Kavanaugh and Ford went to the same school (like the only thing that was true about Chick Fil-A was the CEO is against homosexual marriage, but the stores serve anyone regardless of sexual orientation or beliefs). Beyond that, there is no evidence to the accusation. Accepting it as absolute truth with nothing to back it up can be dangerous. That would mean ANYONE can accuse someone else of ANYTHING because they don't like them or want something. Believe it or not, just as many women lie just like what many men that lie. The degree is just as bad, no more nor less. Gender has no role in actually lying.

I don't think they went to the same school. Didn't Kavanaugh go to an all boys private school?
 
Well can't say I blame her, as many of the majority of the Committee have already proclaimed her a liar, and all he has to do is sit there and say I didn't do it!! She will have her life dissected by partisan politicians on TV. Can't imagine her wanting a simple thing like an investigation done before hand. The FBI investigated Clarence Thomas in 3 days.

But that is different than your statement that if anyone else knew, she must have told, and therefore is a liar. Any number of people could have told.

No one on the committee has called her a liar. None will.
 
Well, I suppose there is not much difference between a therapist in a group or private practice and a military clerk doing the writing/word-processing, but there is a difference between transcribing audio and entering data into a software program.

As for the personal question, I'm the exact wrong person to ask because of how I earn my living. I worked as a temp while in grad school and did type up a lot of dictation (ah, the good old days of a floor pedal!), but I'm generally the last edit before submission/publication.

It was not only audio, and not a Military clerk who did the transcription. I was also reading documentation into the record and also provided hundreds of pages of documents which included ones I provided that I had read from, and marked accordingly for my files.
And there were hundreds of mistakes including names, dates, even years and who was present.

Your experience is based upon ones employed at a Grad school. High levels of accuracy is what I assume. And those that make mistakes on a regular basis are held to account

Now a therapist - making notes, sends tapes, notes for transcription. I would hazard a guess a lower standard of accuracy compared to what you are used to. Not by design, but based upon workload, the Dr. reads the notes, assumes they are correct, the patient does not see them and has no opportunity to correct errors.
 
It is not a matter that if were story isn't disproven she is a liar. The question is whether there is enough evidence to back up her story as other than she says so.

It is notable not only does she give NO specifics, she also has never sworn to anything she has said, including not her written letter. Everything possible has been done to protect from any possible perjury accusation and everything done possible to deny Kavanaugh any ability to provide an alibi.

NO DA and no police department would touch a case when the accuser doesn't know - or refuses to say - when or where it happened, doesn't know how she left and refuses to sign a sworn statement. NONE.
 
Back
Top Bottom