• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey

Doc91478

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
790
Location
North East
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey …
https://saraacarter.com/exclusive-steele-anxious-over-comey-testimony-hopes-firewalls-will-hold/
Newly released text messages between Steele and Ohr before Comey's congressional testimony raise questions EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey Testimony, Hopes “Firewalls Will Hold”.....The text message from Steele, who compiled the infamous unverified dossier on Trump, was sent on March 18, 2017, to Ohr and obtained by SaraACarter.com from a government source, familiar with the ongoing investigation.


~~~~~~
Who or what is the "FIREWALL" mentioned by Christopher Steele in text messages to Bruce Ohr? Hmm!!
Firewalls are either people who serve as buffers so the truth won’t come out, or cover stories for the same purpose. Sure sounds like an intention to obstruct justice when it is invoked with respect to Congressional testimony.
What bothers me most is the criminal aspect of this whole thing. Its not just about the attempt to frame Trump. It's we the American voters. We voted him in to office. The Constitutions say's WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO GET TO CHOSE THE PRESIDENT not the D.C elitists or ideologists. It doesn't matter if we are right or wrong. It does not matter who is best. When ideological groups try to take away this power inherited from our Creator and written by our forefathers its the same as a tyrant(s) creating a coup d' etat, taking away the rights of the people. Just because the appointees of the DoJ, FBI, CIA and DNI did not want the power for themselves, does not make it any less of a coup. These are high crimes of Sedition and Treason.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy US Code
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)​


See: Grassley requests DOJ documents on Bruce Ohr …
Grassley requests DOJ documents on Bruce Ohr dealings with Christopher Steele on anti-Trump dossier | Fox News
May 21, 2018 · The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee asked the Justice Department Monday to turn over communications between former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, British spy Christopher Steele and others about the infamous anti-Trump dossier.
 
EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey …
https://saraacarter.com/exclusive-steele-anxious-over-comey-testimony-hopes-firewalls-will-hold/
Newly released text messages between Steele and Ohr before Comey's congressional testimony raise questions EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey Testimony, Hopes “Firewalls Will Hold”.....The text message from Steele, who compiled the infamous unverified dossier on Trump, was sent on March 18, 2017, to Ohr and obtained by SaraACarter.com from a government source, familiar with the ongoing investigation.


~~~~~~
Who or what is the "FIREWALL" mentioned by Christopher Steele in text messages to Bruce Ohr? Hmm!!
Firewalls are either people who serve as buffers so the truth won’t come out, or cover stories for the same purpose. Sure sounds like an intention to obstruct justice when it is invoked with respect to Congressional testimony.
What bothers me most is the criminal aspect of this whole thing. Its not just about the attempt to frame Trump. It's we the American voters. We voted him in to office. The Constitutions say's WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO GET TO CHOSE THE PRESIDENT not the D.C elitists or ideologists. It doesn't matter if we are right or wrong. It does not matter who is best. When ideological groups try to take away this power inherited from our Creator and written by our forefathers its the same as a tyrant(s) creating a coup d' etat, taking away the rights of the people. Just because the appointees of the DoJ, FBI, CIA and DNI did not want the power for themselves, does not make it any less of a coup. These are high crimes of Sedition and Treason.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy US Code
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)​


See: Grassley requests DOJ documents on Bruce Ohr …
Grassley requests DOJ documents on Bruce Ohr dealings with Christopher Steele on anti-Trump dossier | Fox News
May 21, 2018 · The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee asked the Justice Department Monday to turn over communications between former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, British spy Christopher Steele and others about the infamous anti-Trump dossier.

Where does the Constitution say "we the people" vote for the president?
 
Where does the Constitution say "we the people" vote for the president?

Really?

The man posts a story that not only further corroborates that there was corruption within the FBI and DOJ, but also indicates a possible conspiracy involving several high ranking government officials to lie to congress and cover up their nefarious conduct, and you post that meaningless tripe that falls under the catagory "who gives a rats ass".

Why don't you just post the truth and say that you don't give a damn if the FBI and DOJ were corrupt, because they acted on behalf of your candidate, and against the candidate you opposed, therefore what they did was A-Okay in your book.

Of course if that isn't how you feel, and you are against government corruption, just say so and I will take back what I said.

.
 
EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey …
https://saraacarter.com/exclusive-steele-anxious-over-comey-testimony-hopes-firewalls-will-hold/
Newly released text messages between Steele and Ohr before Comey's congressional testimony raise questions EXCLUSIVE: New Texts Reveal Steele Anxious Over Comey Testimony, Hopes “Firewalls Will Hold”.....The text message from Steele, who compiled the infamous unverified dossier on Trump, was sent on March 18, 2017, to Ohr and obtained by SaraACarter.com from a government source, familiar with the ongoing investigation.


~~~~~~
Who or what is the "FIREWALL" mentioned by Christopher Steele in text messages to Bruce Ohr? Hmm!!
Firewalls are either people who serve as buffers so the truth won’t come out, or cover stories for the same purpose. Sure sounds like an intention to obstruct justice when it is invoked with respect to Congressional testimony.
What bothers me most is the criminal aspect of this whole thing. Its not just about the attempt to frame Trump. It's we the American voters. We voted him in to office. The Constitutions say's WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO GET TO CHOSE THE PRESIDENT not the D.C elitists or ideologists. It doesn't matter if we are right or wrong. It does not matter who is best. When ideological groups try to take away this power inherited from our Creator and written by our forefathers its the same as a tyrant(s) creating a coup d' etat, taking away the rights of the people. Just because the appointees of the DoJ, FBI, CIA and DNI did not want the power for themselves, does not make it any less of a coup. These are high crimes of Sedition and Treason.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy US Code
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)​


See: Grassley requests DOJ documents on Bruce Ohr …
Grassley requests DOJ documents on Bruce Ohr dealings with Christopher Steele on anti-Trump dossier | Fox News
May 21, 2018 · The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee asked the Justice Department Monday to turn over communications between former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, British spy Christopher Steele and others about the infamous anti-Trump dossier.

1. Much of the dossier has been verified.
2. Sara Carter is a right-wing hack.
 
Really?

The man posts a story that not only further corroborates that there was corruption within the FBI and DOJ, but also indicates a possible conspiracy involving several high ranking government officials to lie to congress and cover up their nefarious conduct, and you post that meaningless tripe that falls under the catagory "who gives a rats ass".

Why don't you just post the truth and say that you don't give a damn if the FBI and DOJ were corrupt, because they acted on behalf of your candidate, and against the candidate you opposed, therefore what they did was A-Okay in your book.

Of course if that isn't how you feel, and you are against government corruption, just say so and I will take back what I said.
The man [Doc91478] wrote an entire paragraph about 'we the people' voting for the president. So if he didn't want his claim to be questioned then perhaps he shouldn't have made it the centerpiece of his OP.

...What bothers me most is the criminal aspect of this whole thing. Its not just about the attempt to frame Trump. It's we the American voters. We voted him in to office. The Constitutions say's WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO GET TO CHOSE THE PRESIDENT not the D.C elitists or ideologists. It doesn't matter if we are right or wrong. It does not matter who is best. When ideological groups try to take away this power inherited from our Creator and written by our forefathers its the same as a tyrant(s) creating a coup d' etat, taking away the rights of the people. Just because the appointees of the DoJ, FBI, CIA and DNI did not want the power for themselves, does not make it any less of a coup. These are high crimes of Sedition and Treason...

So where does the Constitution say 'WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO GET TO CHOSE THE PRESIDENT?" Because if he's wrong about that then he's probably wrong about a lot of other things as well.
 
Last edited:
I keep hearing that the dossier was verified, at least partially. Though every time that I ask for proof of this, I either get called a Trumper or some other inane response. Even though we only get that some of the sources that verify this document are still unaccounted for, or unverified themselves.

Second hand information is still at best, second hand.

Though its good to know that Steele is still looking over his shoulder after all this time. A hack like that should have to do so in his case.
 
Where does the Constitution say "we the people" vote for the president?

The Preamble to the Constitution distinctly proclaims:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Furthermore, "The U.S. constitution prescribes basic qualifications of an individual to participate in an election. According to the constitution, every citizen above eighteen years has the right to vote. The right to vote cannot be denied on the basis of race, color, or sex. State legislatures regulate the eligibility of an individual for voting. It is also the responsibility of state legislatures to regulate the qualifications for a candidate appearing on a ballot paper. In most states, citizens must register to vote before casting a ballot.
Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution provides the manner of election and qualifications of members of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Article 2 of the Constitution prescribes the manner of election for the President and Vice President. The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the U.S. The Fifteenth Amendment provides that the right of citizens of the U.S to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the U.S. or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."

Possibly you've missed this information along the way?
 
Last edited:
I keep hearing that the dossier was verified, at least partially. Though every time that I ask for proof of this, I either get called a Trumper or some other inane response. Even though we only get that some of the sources that verify this document are still unaccounted for, or unverified themselves.

Second hand information is still at best, second hand.

Though its good to know that Steele is still looking over his shoulder after all this time. A hack like that should have to do so in his case.


~~~~~~

According to Christopher Steele himself, he has testified in a London Courtroom that information contained in the "Dossier" was unverified or substantiated. Therefore, the information contained within the Dossier has to be considered false until proven true. Perhaps you missed this information?


~~~~~~
Ex-spy admits anti-Trump dossier unverified
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/christopher-steele-admits-dossier-charge-unverifie/
25 April 2017 - Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.
In a court filing, Mr. Steele also says his accusations against the president and his aides about a supposed Russian hacking conspiracy were never supposed to be made public
 
Last edited:
What are y’all gonna grasp at when straws are finally outlawed?


:doh. :mrgreen:
 
Like what?

Prove it.



In your dreams...

Sara Carter is a national and international award-winning investigative reporter.

Nope, like I said, she's a right-wing hack:

https://www.mediamatters.org/people/sara-carter

Once colleagues at the right-wing website Circa News, John Solomon has moved on to The Hill while Sara Carter is a Fox contributor who publishes her reporting at her personal blog. Their slanted reporting based on conservative sources helps fuel anti-Mueller Fox hosts eager for information confirming their dire theories, and it garners the pair regular appearances throughout the SHEU -- and Hannity’s call to award them with Pulitzer Prizes.

Do you have any LINKS to this "Dossier" verification you speak of?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ue-mi6-putin-moscow-hotel-cohen-a8315046.html

https://www.npr.org/2018/04/25/5860...w-about-the-russia-investigations-the-dossier

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-russia-dossier-one-year-later-what-we-know-777116
 



From your own links:

"What is the dossier?

It's a 35-page collection of reports and memos alleging deep connections between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russian officials. The dossier also includes salacious material that would be embarrassing to Trump and could have left him open to blackmail or coercion.

NPR has not detailed the contents because it remains partly unverified. The FBI has substantiated at least some of the material but there are no public details as to how much or which aspects — nor which aspects have been debunked."
 
From your own links:

"What is the dossier?

It's a 35-page collection of reports and memos alleging deep connections between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russian officials. The dossier also includes salacious material that would be embarrassing to Trump and could have left him open to blackmail or coercion.

NPR has not detailed the contents because it remains partly unverified. The FBI has substantiated at least some of the material but there are no public details as to how much or which aspects — nor which aspects have been debunked."

I wonder if he ever researches the links he posts.
Media Matters... lol
 
Like what?

~~~~~~


So far, no single piece of evidence has been made public proving that the Trump campaign joined with Russia to steal the US presidency - nothing. with the FBI's powers to subpoena witnesses and threaten charges of obstructing justice - nothing damning has emerged.
Meanwhile Christopher Steele under oath in London swore that little to nothing in the dossier was verified.
 
Where does the Constitution say "we the people" vote for the president?

The elitists in the Electoral College elect the President and in 2016 they did not even do that according to the way it was explained to the American population in the effort to get the Constitution ratified.
 
~~~~~~


So far, no single piece of evidence has been made public proving that the Trump campaign joined with Russia to steal the US presidency - nothing. with the FBI's powers to subpoena witnesses and threaten charges of obstructing justice - nothing damning has emerged.
Meanwhile Christopher Steele under oath in London swore that little to nothing in the dossier was verified.

Of course that's true.
Anyone who says "much of it has been verified" is simply repeating something they heard on MOJO (or an equally dependable source).
They can't name anything of consequence that has been verified.
 
From your own links:

"What is the dossier?

It's a 35-page collection of reports and memos alleging deep connections between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russian officials. The dossier also includes salacious material that would be embarrassing to Trump and could have left him open to blackmail or coercion.

NPR has not detailed the contents because it remains partly unverified. The FBI has substantiated at least some of the material but there are no public details as to how much or which aspects — nor which aspects have been debunked."


The problem is that those who push that BS know that there are people who need for it to be true, and therefor will believe it without question.

Essentially the "some of it is verified!" boils down to this: We have public record of Page travelling to Prague.... the end.

All the bull****, the actual meat of the criminal conspiracy, who he met, what he did, etc? Not verified.

In other words, this Simpsons bit has become reality for some sad clowns...

Officer Eddie: (reading Steve Sax's license) Well well, Steve Sax, from New York City.
Officer Lou: I heard some guy got killed in New York City and they never solved the case. But you wouldn't know anything about that now, would you, Steve?
(Lou and Eddie laugh)
Steve Sax: But there are hundreds of unsolved murders in New York City.
Officer Lou: You don't know when to keep your mouth shut, do you, Saxxy Boy?
 
~~~~~~

According to Christopher Steele himself, he has testified in a London Courtroom that information contained in the "Dossier" was unverified or substantiated. Therefore, the information contained within the Dossier has to be considered false until proven true. Perhaps you missed this information?


~~~~~~
Ex-spy admits anti-Trump dossier unverified
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/christopher-steele-admits-dossier-charge-unverifie/
25 April 2017 - Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.
In a court filing, Mr. Steele also says his accusations against the president and his aides about a supposed Russian hacking conspiracy were never supposed to be made public

Oh I already knew that. I'm just laughing at the current predicament that he is finding himself in.
 
Back
Top Bottom