• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court rules in favor of Ohio 'voter purge'

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,771
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/391623-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-ohio-voter-purge

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld Ohio’s "use it or lose it" practice of cleaning up its voter rolls.

In a 5-4 decision, the court’s majority said the practice, known as the “supplemental process,” does not violate the National Voter Registration Act, which bars states from removing the names of people from the voter rolls for failing to vote.

The court's five conservative justices voted in the majority, with the court's four liberals dissenting.
Under the supplemental process, voters who have not voted in two years are flagged and sent a confirmation notice. Voters who then fail to respond to the notice and fail to vote within the next two years are removed from the rolls.
=================================
Smacks a little bit like voter suppression to me, but seems fair in today's mobile society.
 
I dont see how that could be construed as 'suppression' if they are given 5 years to vote and dont AND if they are removed from the rolls but can re-enroll and vote when they choose to.
 
I dont see how that could be construed as 'suppression' if they are given 5 years to vote and dont AND if they are removed from the rolls but can re-enroll and vote when they choose to.

Like I said in the other thread, the Leftists aren't going to like this. I'll add, they're going to go bonkers over it.
 
So this is odd. It seems that the Ohio actions are not only Constitutional as per the SCOTUS, but follow the guidelines proposed by democrat and voted on affirmatively by every democrat that voted for (which was al of them) in the 1993 Voter Registration Act. That legislation not only allows but CALL FOR the purging of inactive voters, following prescribed guidelines.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-103hr2rfs/pdf/BILLS-103hr2rfs.pdf

So other than just trying to clam infringement of voting rights, this is...law.
 
So this is odd. It seems that the Ohio actions are not only Constitutional as per the SCOTUS, but follow the guidelines proposed by democrat and voted on affirmatively by every democrat that voted for (which was al of them) in the 1993 Voter Registration Act. That legislation not only allows but CALL FOR the purging of inactive voters, following prescribed guidelines.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-103hr2rfs/pdf/BILLS-103hr2rfs.pdf

So other than just trying to clam infringement of voting rights, this is...law.

It amazes me how liberals will decry voter ID efforts, stating they are unnecessary provided the voter rolls are maintained -- then fight any effort to maintain the voter rolls.
 
It amazes me how liberals will decry voter ID efforts, stating they are unnecessary provided the voter rolls are maintained -- then fight any effort to maintain the voter rolls.
The politicians are fixated on message and cause. That goes both ways. The major parties are worthless.
 
Back
Top Bottom