• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme court rejects appeal from Blackwater guards convicted of killing Iraqi civilians

Let's take a look at your list, shall we?

A Taiwanese plan to whack the Chicom premier that the CIA had actually rejected.

Vague and and unreputable claims about "occult armed forces" from a few Italians.

Complaints about efforts to remove Allende, a man who according to the Mitrokhin Archive was actively working for the KGB--- Chilean efforts.

Cuban exiles conducting activities without CIA support, despite the claims of a communist regime which blames the CIA for literally everything.

Complaints about the efforts to hunt down Pablo Escobar. The poor, poor drug kingpin:roll:

Complaints about the US helping people in Kosovo fight against the Serbs actively trying to wipe them out. Hmm....as we can see there is no parallel between your beloved Gaddafi's ordering the murder of huge numbers of innocent people and anything they US did.

There are WAY more than what the source listed, just look them up yourself. You are very naive if you think that all of the United States' efforts to fund foreign entities are just and moral. You can put any positive spin to the incidents but there always is a negative motive behind each one
 
Oh look, a totally unrelated claim about a totally unrelated incident.

I guess you do think the Kurds gassed themselves :roll:

No i think that the US are hypocrites and fund the same attacks they condemn
 
There are WAY more than what the source listed, just look them up yourself. You are very naive if you think that all of the United States' efforts to fund foreign entities are just and moral. You can put any positive spin to the incidents but there always is a negative motive behind each one

Yes, I get that you are clinging to your fantasies in a desperate attempt to justify your support for vicious dictators who horrifically abused their own people. Your problem is that you have chosen a particularly bad pair of thugs to defend
 
No i think that the US are hypocrites and fund the same attacks they condemn

Except your own link doesn't even support that claim.

Furthermore, your argument that "the US funds chemical attacks" in addition to being simply factually incorrect, is a piss poor defense of the dictators the US overthrew
 
Citation?

Citation was a famous race horse in the last century, and Cessna named its new line of jets after that horse. I think he was a Triple Crown winner too.
 
"If"? What, you think the Kurds gassed themselves?

That would be around the same time the USA was helping him to gas Iranians , right ?

FP said:
In 1988, during the waning days of Iraq’s war with Iran, the United States learned through satellite imagery that Iran was about to gain a major strategic advantage by exploiting a hole in Iraqi defenses. U.S. intelligence officials conveyed the location of the Iranian troops to Iraq, fully aware that Hussein’s military would attack with chemical weapons, including sarin, a lethal nerve agent.

The intelligence included imagery and maps about Iranian troop movements, as well as the locations of Iranian logistics facilities and details about Iranian air defenses. The Iraqis used mustard gas and sarin prior to four major offensives in early 1988 that relied on U.S. satellite imagery, maps, and other intelligence. These attacks helped to tilt the war in Iraq’s favor and bring Iran to the negotiating table, and they ensured that the Reagan administration’s long-standing policy of securing an Iraqi victory would succeed. But they were also the last in a series of chemical strikes stretching back several years that the Reagan administration knew about and didn’t disclose.

Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran – Foreign Policy

BTW if you don't like the source , tough.................. you are hardly in a position to complain about them seeing as your default position is to run to Wikipedia ad nauseam in a bid to appear that you actually have some personal knowledge of what you speak.

I did say your apologetics for US foreign policy horror shows would give me the opportunity to put some meat on the bones
 
Yes, I get that you are clinging to your fantasies in a desperate attempt to justify your support for vicious dictators who horrifically abused their own people. Your problem is that you have chosen a particularly bad pair of thugs to defend

Nope, it's you that is " desperately clinging to the fantasies " that US state terrorism/global interventionism and support for brutal/repressive regimes themselves is due to wanting to make the world a better place.

F*** me is that a truly bad choice to try to defend and you have the temerity to attack others :lamo

BTW he wasn't " supporting " anyone imo , he was merely positing some evident truths that run counter to your perceptions as shaped by the CIA and co
 
False yet again, Gaddafi armed numerous terrorist groups and did so for decades.

T

The Palestine Liberation Organization of the disputed territories in the West Bank and Gaza Strip received support from Libya, as well as many other Arab states.

The Moro National Liberation Front was a Islamist rebel army which fought in the Philippines against the military dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos

Umkhonto we Sizwe – Xhosa, for the "spear of the nation" was originally the military wing of the African National Congress (a multiracial, center-left political party) which fought against the white minority led Apartheid regime in South Africa. During the years of MK's underground struggle the group was supported by Libya.

ETA – Basque Fatherland and Liberty, a Basque separatist group fighting for the independence of the Basques from Spain with ties to the Provisional Irish Republican Army also received training support from Libya in the 1960s and mid-1970s.

Libya was also one of the main supporters of the Polisario Front in the former Spanish Sahara[99] – a nationalist group dedicated to ending Spanish colonialism in the region, and from 1975, to combatting the Moroccan occupation of what is now known as Western Sahara. The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) was proclaimed by Polisario on 28 February 1976, and Libya began to recognize the SADR as the legitimate government of Western Sahara starting 15 April 1980. While monetary and military Libyan support for the Sahrawi cause dwindled in the mid-1980s, after a rapprochement with Morocco, the enemy of Polisario, some Sahrawi refugee students are still able to apply for higher education in Libya.[9]"

Additionally:

"On 11 June 1972, Gaddafi announced that any Arab wishing to volunteer for Palestinian armed groups "can register his name at any Libyan embassy will be given adequate training for combat". He also promised financial support for attacks.[1][2][3] In response, the United States withdrew its ambassador. On 7 October 1972, Gaddafi praised the Lod Airport massacre, carried out by the Japanese Red Army, and demanded Palestinian terrorist groups to carry out similar attacks.[1]

Gaddafi played a key role in promoting the use of oil embargoes as a political weapon for challenging the West, hoping that an oil price rise and embargo in 1973 would persuade the West—especially the United States—to end support for Israel. Gaddafi rejected both Soviet communism and Western capitalism and claimed he was charting a middle course for his government.[4]

In 1973 the Irish Naval Service intercepted the vessel Claudia in Irish territorial waters, which carried Soviet arms from Libya to the Provisional IRA.[5][6]

In 1976 after a series of terror attacks by the Provisional IRA, Gaddafi announced that "the bombs which are convulsing Britain and breaking its spirit are the bombs of Libyan people. We have sent them to the Irish revolutionaries so that the British will pay the price for their past deeds".[1]

Together with Fidel Castro and other Communist leaders, Gaddafi supported Soviet protege Haile Mariam Mengistu, the military ruler of Ethiopia,[7] who was later convicted for a genocide that killed thousands.

In October 1978, Gaddafi sent Libyan troops to aid Idi Amin in the Uganda–Tanzania War when Amin tried to annex the northern Tanzanian province of Kagera, and Tanzania counterattacked. Amin lost the battle and later fled to exile in Libya, where he remained for almost a year.[8]"

How lazy is this ?

A huge copy and paste from your favourite and universally edited source

He funded the PLO ........................ fighting to free their people from a foreign military occupation and illegal settlement and gain their right to self determination. The US has almost single handedly prolonged this conflict ( by using it's veto ) so as to have a reliable ally/toehold in this crucial geostrategic region.

But Gaddafi is in the wrong in your world and the US is right

Using oil as a weapon, wow , what a horror of humanity you would have to be to employ such dreadful tactics :roll:

Supporting nationalists trying to throw off colonial masters in Western Sahara.................. how awful :roll:

Supporting nationalists trying to throw off the military dictatorship in the Philippines.................... I take it you must support military dictatorships ? Ah , only if they are propped up /installed by the US :roll:

Allende was a KGB stooge................... but was the democratically elected leader of Chile who was murdered in a US inspired coup that led to the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet and the deaths and torturing that followed/endured. See you do support brutal/repressive military dictatorships but only if the US installs and/or backs them.

So predictable and so sad............... but hey , your choice and your cross to bare
 
How lazy is this ?

A huge copy and paste from your favourite and universally edited source

He funded the PLO ........................ fighting to free their people from a foreign military occupation and illegal settlement and gain their right to self determination. The US has almost single handedly prolonged this conflict ( by using it's veto ) so as to have a reliable ally/toehold in this crucial geostrategic region.

But Gaddafi is in the wrong in your world and the US is right

Using oil as a weapon, wow , what a horror of humanity you would have to be to employ such dreadful tactics :roll:

Supporting nationalists trying to throw off colonial masters in Western Sahara.................. how awful :roll:

Supporting nationalists trying to throw off the military dictatorship in the Philippines.................... I take it you must support military dictatorships ? Ah , only if they are propped up /installed by the US :roll:

Allende was a KGB stooge................... but was the democratically elected leader of Chile who was murdered in a US inspired coup that led to the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet and the deaths and torturing that followed/endured. See you do support brutal/repressive military dictatorships but only if the US installs and/or backs them.

So predictable and so sad............... but hey , your choice and your cross to bare

Qaddafi supported, supplied and funded many terrorist groups. Fact.
 
Qaddafi supported, supplied and funded many terrorist groups. Fact.

You know how this works............. one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter

Judging by the above you too might be a supporter of military dictatorships and colonial rule

Your own nation trained funded and backed a whole terrorist army attacking Nicaragua amongst other things so you are in no position to rip into Gaddafi
 
These guys are getting hosed. Justice isn't being served.

The murdering thugs from a private army are getting what they deserve. Shame that the same cannot be said for their boss or his sister.
 
Justice is being served. However, I refuse to being judged by my sibling's actions. Don't you? I find it interesting that you must turn a positive into another bashing.

I agree.
 
The murdering thugs from a private army are getting what they deserve. Shame that the same cannot be said for their boss or his sister.

Would you say that about British PMC's?
 
You know how this works............. one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter

Judging by the above you too might be a supporter of military dictatorships and colonial rule

Your own nation trained funded and backed a whole terrorist army attacking Nicaragua amongst other things so you are in no position to rip into Gaddafi

Reading in to what others post as you did with colonial rule and military dictatorships is dishonest.

How many US trained groups were blowing up Airliners for example or bombing market places. Sarina gas in subways? Random shootings?
 
Back
Top Bottom