- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 14,977
- Reaction score
- 5,276
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I disagree. I don't think Comey had ANYTHING to do with Hillary losing as he twice exonerated her of any serious wrong doing prior to the election and blunted much of the negative news that was certain to come out re Anthony Wiener having Hillary e-mails on his computer. As the whole e-mail server thing had been in the news for many months, he gave Hillary voters assurance and justification that it was okay to vote for her. If anything he probably netted her a few more votes but even that is unlikely as those who voted for her had to know about the e-mail scandal and had already decided that they didn't care. Even as the votes were coming in, all the MSM including Fox News fully expected her to win by a healthy margin and the odds makers had her as the favorite by a huge margin.
Hillary lost because she promised nothing other than contempt for Trump/Republicans/conservatives/libertarians plus continuance of the status quo. Trump offered an agenda that at least provided some hope. That is it in a nutshell.
I agree with a lot of what you are saying. However Comey is an investigator not the media. He should have simply handed over any evidence to the DOJ and let them decide what was wrong or right. I think it should have been the DOJ that informed the media of whether Hillary had done wrong. We don't need every cop and investigator grandstanding. Especially right before an election. He doesn't decide innocence or guilt. His job is just the gathering of evidence. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Not judge, jury, and media outlet.
Last edited: