• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cohen doubles down on claim he's never been to Prague after Mueller report

If the media is wrong that reflects nothing on the rest of what Mueller may, or may not have as evidence, it just reflects poorly on those media outlets.

But if this story is true it is a major revelation.
If the story is true, no doubt. But what it 'reflects' on is the number of people that are convinced and have been since day 1 with no proof.
 
If the story is true, no doubt. But what it 'reflects' on is the number of people that are convinced and have been since day 1 with no proof.

My standard of proof will be the same as yours was for Hillary ;)
 
And if proven correct, you'll still declare THERES NOT ONE SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE like every other right winger.
On the contrary. If its proven I will say the same thing I have said since day 1. I want a FULL investigation...of BOTH parties, and I want to see EVERYONE guilty of collusion to burn.

Thats what YOU want too...right?
 
Im not surprised about what things 'look like to you'. You conveniently have overlooked the people in this thread that are certain this is proof positive. Says a lot about your eyes.

"People." I count one person in this thread who's accepted the claim without reservation.
 
On the contrary. If its proven I will say the same thing I have said since day 1. I want a FULL investigation...of BOTH parties, and I want to see EVERYONE guilty of collusion to burn.

Thats what YOU want too...right?

Just curious: do you deny that there were multiple attempts at collusion?
 
On the contrary. If its proven I will say the same thing I have said since day 1. I want a FULL investigation...of BOTH parties, and I want to see EVERYONE guilty of collusion to burn.

Thats what YOU want too...right?

Oh, right. I forgot about the right wing "DEMOCRATS COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA" propaganda.

Sure. Investigate that. Oh wait. They are.
 
My standard of proof will be the same as yours was for Hillary ;)
Which allegation? The known fact that she lied about the content of the emails? The known fact that she lied about sending and receiving classified materials? The known fact that they destroyed evidence?

Which known facts convinced you? And frankly...I'm surprised to see you finally acknowledge her guilt...but its good to know.
 
Which allegation? The known fact that she lied about the content of the emails? The known fact that she lied about sending and receiving classified materials? The known fact that they destroyed evidence?

Which known facts convinced you? And frankly...I'm surprised to see you finally acknowledge her guilt...but its good to know.

Your standards were good? Then you have nothing to worry about.
 
Oh, right. I forgot about the right wing "DEMOCRATS COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA" propaganda.

Sure. Investigate that. Oh wait. They are.
Of all the 'knowns' which party hired an outside agent to contract another outside agent, to contact a foreign agent, to contact Russian agents to fabricate evidence which was then used to sway an election?
 
Just curious: do you deny that there were multiple attempts at collusion?
Ive seen actual evidence of collusion by the DNC and the Clinton camp to **** over Bernie Sanders and half of the democrat voting base. Ive seen actual evidence of the DNC contracting outside agencies to get to Russians to create evidence and we know that the DNC then colluded with certain individuals within the FBI to atack the current president.

On the flip side...

We have seen evidence of a meeting between Trump Jr to collect offered dirt. We have seen People in the Trump camp lie about their involvement years before the campaign. We have seen an investigation uncover fraud not in any related to Russia.

But actual evidence of Trump colluding with Russia? I suppose you must be sitting on that evidence yourself. But who knows what we will actually see when the investigation is finished.
 
"People." I count one person in this thread who's accepted the claim without reservation.
You mean the OP? Post 3? the nevertrumper? Or hell...any of the individuals that just took it on faith that he was there traveling undetected through Europe? Only 1 huh?

Motes.
 
We have seen evidence of a meeting between Trump Jr to collect offered dirt. We have seen People in the Trump camp lie about their involvement years before the campaign. We have seen an investigation uncover fraud not in any related to Russia.

But actual evidence of Trump colluding with Russia? I suppose you must be sitting on that evidence yourself. But who knows what we will actually see when the investigation is finished.

And don't forget that Papdopoulos drunkenly bragged to an Australian diplomat that he was going to be given emails by a Russian agent.

But okay, you at least acknowledge the attempts at collusion. Just checking.
 
You mean the OP? Post 3? the nevertrumper? Or hell...any of the individuals that just took it on faith that he was there traveling undetected through Europe? Only 1 huh?

Motes.

So far, only cubansmokes accepts the claim without condition.
 
And don't forget that Papdopoulos drunkenly bragged to an Australian diplomat that he was going to be given emails by a Russian agent.

But okay, you at least acknowledge the attempts at collusion. Just checking.
Papawhopoulis? Yeah man...thats what I usually build legal opinions on. Reported second hand conversations by drunk people.
 
Papawhopoulis? Yeah man...thats what I usually build legal opinions on. Reported second hand conversations by drunk people.

Papa-WHO?-poulos.

Wow, that's ingenius. You must have been waiting to use that one for months.
 
Papa-WHO?-poulos.

Wow, that's ingenius. You must have been waiting to use that one for months.
:roll:

Now...about YOUR willingness to acknowledge collusion on the part of the DNC.....
 
Europe has pretty porous borders. When I flew from Paris to Cologne, my German guide had to ask the border agent to stamp my passport as I wanted a 'souvenir.' My impression is that you could rent a car or take a train & travel undetected from Germany to Prague & back while leaving no traces.

Obviously you have never been there, since the European Union does have open borders. Once you enter one country, you can visit most any of them without a passport. Its similar in the US as going from NY State to Florida.
 
:roll:

Now...about YOUR willingness to acknowledge collusion on the part of the DNC.....

Sounds like a good topic for another thread.
 
Here's the dossier pages that mention Cohen. It alleges that Cohen met in Prague to pay the hackers...

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RbpBxJ3QNyvts_w16UcSSGeH7cSrXK9U3wIq0OOq-Xs/mobilebasic


k9KskWbbw5nm4ngYP-B4tmZnEZyRqfwDNMLQXbHjBnIT71N8tdTU-4X08rHWhdf2v57XxnEMFfK_tBa6Cn-Qutw6TISNJ6dSTL2tJpypVdlqgIupmwYDKpruST4UxhSphA=s800



e9IwphiuedzZsn-cZRwPB0XUksTYwLmXMwyuZgbPGgUPdIPECZ7VIKEb7e4HlxapVoDzkP3RvHN2edbCgcugrWLBwHConVxEj-WAxDp6t6sNXEiKRlO71twGlbIdlgoTgg=s800
 
:lamo

Thats what I figured.

****ing pathetic.

To my knowledge, I have not been given special administrative privileges that grant me more of a right to start new threads than you. If you'd like to start a new thread but don't know how, I'd be happy to explain it to you.
 
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-claim-hes-never-been-to-prague-after-mueller

Cohen doubles down on claim he's never been to Prague after Mueller report

Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen on Saturday responded to a report that special counsel Robert Mueller has evidence that Cohen went to Prague during the 2016 election, slamming it as “bad reporting.”

“Bad reporting, bad information and bad story,” Cohen tweeted, calling out the reporter behind the story by name.

“No matter how many times or ways they write it, I have never been to Prague. I was in LA with my son. Proven!”

McClatchy reported Friday that Mueller has evidence that Cohen traveled to Prague in the summer of 2016, a claim first made in the so-called "Steele dossier" compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

The document alleged that Cohen had secretly traveled to Prague during the 2016 campaign and met with a prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, purportedly Konstantin Kosachev.
=====================================================
The Steele Dossier, most of which has been verified, links Trump's 'lawyer' Cohen with Putin ally during 2016 campaign.

The Dossier is one golden shower away from being 100% accurate.
 
Multiple passports are fairly common. My niece was born in Germany but her father was American, so she has both U.S. & German passports. Getting a duplicate U.S. passport is pretty simple. I lost mine once & got a replacement, so anything is possible. Cohen has more than one cell phone so why not more than one passport? Considering some of the sleazy things he has been involved with, I wouldn't be surprised.

This is the kind of thing that gets to me. A prior investigation established a viable alibi to the current accusation. Now another anonymous source dredges the accusation back up and it’s again presented as fact. I’m tired of “facts” without evidence being reported as news. It’s nothing more than mental masturbation.
 
This is the kind of thing that gets to me. A prior investigation established a viable alibi to the current accusation. Now another anonymous source dredges the accusation back up and it’s again presented as fact. I’m tired of “facts” without evidence being reported as news. It’s nothing more than mental masturbation.

Mental masturbation is why we're here.
 
Back
Top Bottom