• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man Who Died In Trump Tower Fire Tried To Sell Apartment, Friend Says

The underlying importance of this thread is Trump's willingness to risk public safety because he is hostile to regulations. This isn't the only time. See below:

South Carolina regulators on Tuesday rejected an effort by the Trump Organization to limit its environmental cleanup liabilities at an industrial site once owned by President Trump’s eldest son.

During the campaign, Trump stated that "for every new regulation, two must be eliminated," emphasizing his belief that regulations are inherently bad.
 
MTAtech said:
The underlying importance of this thread is Trump's willingness to risk public safety because he is hostile to regulations. This isn't the only time. See below:

South Carolina regulators on Tuesday rejected an effort by the Trump Organization to limit its environmental cleanup liabilities at an industrial site once owned by President Trump’s eldest son.

During the campaign, Trump stated that "for every new regulation, two must be eliminated," emphasizing his belief that regulations are inherently bad.
Click to expand...

Trump's supposed willingness to risk public safety has absolutely no bearing in this situation.
 
MTAtech said:
The underlying importance of this thread is Trump's willingness to risk public safety because he is hostile to regulations. This isn't the only time. See below:

South Carolina regulators on Tuesday rejected an effort by the Trump Organization to limit its environmental cleanup liabilities at an industrial site once owned by President Trump’s eldest son.

During the campaign, Trump stated that "for every new regulation, two must be eliminated," emphasizing his belief that regulations are inherently bad.
Click to expand...

Phooey.

There was no "regulation" requiring Trump to put in sprinklers in his building.

You made that up.
 
reinoe said:
If he started the fire then it means he'd rather die in a fire than have Trump as his president.

And he probably wouldn't have died in the fire at all if the Millionaire limousine liberals in the building agreed to a temporary rate increase to pay for the sprinkler system. Instead the tenants decided that the risk was worth it.
Click to expand...

It means nothing of the sort.

Homeowners associations can decide to spend money or not. That's called a personal decision.

While I haven't seen anything tell me why or how the fire started, the unit didn't belong to President Trump. Nor did the building. This was not Trumps fault or his problem.
 
Amelia said:
Yada, yada. We know they were up to code.

And we know the code was inadequate because concessions were made to the rich landlords, including Trump, who didn't want to pay for sprinklers.
Click to expand...

So it's up to the code but because you hate President Trump that is not good enough.
Do a bit more research on the subject because you are looking truly foolish with this line of nonsense!
 
hanger4 said:
Trump's supposed willingness to risk public safety has absolutely no bearing in this situation.
Click to expand...
Your Honor, It reflects the mindset of Mr. Trump, who happens also to be in a position to support or eviscerate regulations. It's an omen of things to come.
 
Last edited:
MTAtech said:
The underlying importance of this thread is Trump's willingness to risk public safety because he is hostile to regulations. This isn't the only time. See below:

South Carolina regulators on Tuesday rejected an effort by the Trump Organization to limit its environmental cleanup liabilities at an industrial site once owned by President Trump’s eldest son.

During the campaign, Trump stated that "for every new regulation, two must be eliminated," emphasizing his belief that regulations are inherently bad.
Click to expand...

^^ that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom