• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does Stormy Daniels Have “Images” of Donald Trump?

Well I guess we'll see if the Donald had a problem down there or not.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
Long before I got married, as a young sailor I'd known my share of working ladies (it was expected and almost required of sailors in overseas ports back in the day)...and there was an old saying that when you do the nasty with working girls, you're also doing the nasty with everyone they'd had before. But another old saying went, "a stiff d**k has no conscience"...meaning that most young men really could care less who's had her before. Been there, done that, and waited in the clap line for the short-arm inspection as a result. That was pretty normal for us sailors back in the day.

Bearing that in mind, if I were to somehow become single again (which would be a nightmare for me - I'm very happily married), I cannot even imagine for a moment touching Stormy Daniels. She's had Trump inside of her - EWWWW!!!! - and, well, if it were a choice between her and lifelong celibacy, this retired sailor would most certainly choose the latter.
Click to expand...
not very far




somehow, i think you could go where no tRump had gone before
 
Glen Contrarian said:
Doesn't matter. He spooged at some point...and because of that, I wouldn't touch her with yours, much less mine.
Click to expand...

c'mon swabby, after you get past the smell, you have it half licked
 
Donald and Cohen are fighting awfully hard to keep something on the hush.

Interestingly, the NDA also forbids Stormy Daniels to discuss paternity in relation to the Trump tryst.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Donald and Cohen are fighting awfully hard to keep something on the hush.

Interestingly, the NDA also forbids Stormy Daniels to discuss paternity in relation to the Trump tryst.
Click to expand...

I bet, they are trying to keep her mouth shut because he performed a golden shower. Which would add credibility to that dossier account. Only way it makes sense to me, because literally no one cares if he ****ed a pornstar. I mean do you care? I don't.
 
Kreton said:
Maybe he wants people to think he banged a porn star and the money was for her to make people think he did it while he denied it. Nailed it.
Click to expand...
Or he nailed her, as the case may be.
 
tres borrachos said:
Yup that was an unforced error by Huckabee Sanders yesterday. Big mistake. I'm going to watch today's presser and see how she gets hammered for it.
Click to expand...

Not the best move on her part.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
Y'know, to this day I cannot blame Clinton for lying to Congress. Think about it: there he is, with all the world's major networks' cameras pointed directly at him, being forced (by people who have ridiculed and attacked him for years) to answer about whether he had been unfaithful to his wife (whom he probably still loved - being unfaithful doesn't mean that he didn't love her - it means he was unfaithful). Please bear in mind that I'm not excusing his unfaithfulness - not for a moment! - but I'm only saying that in that instance, in that particular situation that has AFAIK has never been faced by any human being before (all the world's major networks, remember), I honestly can't blame him for lying.

There's an old French saying that goes, "he who refuses to lie does not love his wife". The purpose of that saying is more likely geared towards how it's sometimes good and right for a man to lie through his teeth to his wife, such as when he tells her how beautiful she is just after she's given birth. Gallantry demands that he tell her how beautiful she is...and that he'd better damn well mean it! What, is he going to tell his wife who just gave birth that she's anything but beautiful at that moment? This applies to Bill Clinton in that even though he was guilty as sin, not only is he trying to avoid his own deep shame...but he's also likely trying to minimize the shame that he has brought upon his own wife (and hating himself for having done so). So again, I am not excusing his infidelity by any means, but I can't blame him for lying to Congress in that situation.
Click to expand...

Clinton didn't get into legal trouble for lying to congress. The problem was that he lied to the court, under oath, and continued to work to cover it up. And it wasn't about simple infidelity with one woman either, but involved unwanted sexual advances, and abuse across a string of women. Bill Clinton isn't what you want to use as the yardstick when evaluating Trump.
 
dcsports said:
Clinton didn't get into legal trouble for lying to congress. The problem was that he lied to the court, under oath, and continued to work to cover it up. And it wasn't about simple infidelity with one woman either, but involved unwanted sexual advances, and abuse across a string of women. Bill Clinton isn't what you want to use as the yardstick when evaluating Trump.
Click to expand...

Clinton was investigated for all of those. Trump isn't being investigated for any of them, even though he's been accused by more than four times as many women. Gee, that couldn't be because the GOP controlled both houses of Congress then and now, could it?
 
Ikari said:
She may. I think with what she has been doing to fight the supposed Hush Agreement that it may be likely she does. Everything she is doing, I feel she is doing because she thinks she can make a mad profit off of it. And likely she can, we're a drama driven, substance lacking culture now.

That being said, I do not care nor am I interested in her story or anything that she may have. While infidelity certainly detracts from Trump's character, it's not illegal. If he did anything illegal in attempting to suppress this information, then OK. Investigate that. But fundamentally, this is a problem for Trump and his family to work out.
Click to expand...

I think she is doing it because in her business, she's getting up there in age, and this 'scandal' pushes back her 'sell by' date. Let's face it, being a porn star/stripper is for someone who is younger, and time stops for no man or woman. It's basically extending her career.
 
Ikari said:
She may. I think with what she has been doing to fight the supposed Hush Agreement that it may be likely she does. Everything she is doing, I feel she is doing because she thinks she can make a mad profit off of it. And likely she can, we're a drama driven, substance lacking culture now.

That being said, I do not care nor am I interested in her story or anything that she may have. While infidelity certainly detracts from Trump's character, it's not illegal. If he did anything illegal in attempting to suppress this information, then OK. Investigate that. But fundamentally, this is a problem for Trump and his family to work out.
Click to expand...

Imagine the money she could make with a Trump sex tape
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Fake Names and Dick Pics, the Stormy lawsuit just keeps getting better and better:



https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/03/stormy-daniels-donald-trump-lawsuit-michael-cohen

https://www.thedailybeast.com/seth-meyers-did-trump-send-a-dick-pic-to-stormy-daniels.

https://www.gq.com/story/stormy-daniels-suing-trump
Click to expand...

Oh she's got something or she wouldn't be puttin it out there. Trump's lawyers are trying real hard to shut 'er up, but she's gonna spill any time now.
 
Ikari said:
She may. I think with what she has been doing to fight the supposed Hush Agreement that it may be likely she does. Everything she is doing, I feel she is doing because she thinks she can make a mad profit off of it. And likely she can, we're a drama driven, substance lacking culture now.

That being said, I do not care nor am I interested in her story or anything that she may have. While infidelity certainly detracts from Trump's character, it's not illegal. If he did anything illegal in attempting to suppress this information, then OK. Investigate that. But fundamentally, this is a problem for Trump and his family to work out.
Click to expand...
I mostly agree, except with the bolded.

We have a President trying to silence citizen detractors, and this don't sit well with me. Whether Daniels' speaking freely, Micheal Wolff's publishing his book, or threats against CNN's FCC license, I do not believe a sitting President should be allowed to push his weight against free speech.

Besides my moral & ethical qualms, the First Amendment was specifically enumerated to protect us from government censorship of this sort. And it don't get any more "government", than President of the U.S.!
 
images
 
sangha said:
images
Click to expand...
You know it's a pretty sad day in America, when Americans are confronted with determining who in general has more credibility? Their President? Or some little known porn-star? And without even taking consideration of the specific circumstances, the obvious choice is the essentialy unknown porn-star!

I keep insisting history will not be kind to us ...
 
Chomsky said:
You know it's a pretty sad day in America, when Americans are confronted with determining who in general has more credibility? Their President? Or some little known porn-star? And without even taking consideration of the specific circumstances, the obvious choice is the essentialy unknown porn-star!

I keep insisting history will not be kind to us ...
Click to expand...

If Trump is to be believed over the little known porn star, he'll have to explain why he gave her $130,00.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom