- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
They have a limitation to act on their own in this circumstance:
Rogers' testimony is there in black and white. The president can give Rogers and the other agencies additional authorities. He didn't say lift. He said he hadn't "been granted any additional authorities". Once again, if that were not true, the senate committee members would have corrected him. Vociferously. But they did not.
Take it up with whoever put the current rules in place and again, it's a good thing the national intelligence agencies cannot go off on a lark and take these kinds of actions without presidential approval.
I can't see the president having legal authorities, regarding the duties within Rogers' purview that Rogers doesn't have. It isn't the president's job to micromanage Rogers' agency. The president relates to the director his intent and the director conducts his duties within his legal authority and with the president's intent in mind.
Now, I know someone is going slide in with some smartass post that goes "but...but...Trump doesn't intend to do anything". But, if President Trump had given orders to do nothing, I'm sure that Rogers would have said that. Exactly that. I doubt that it's outside Rogers' authority to guard the country, especially the voting process, against cyber invasion.
Then again, Rogers was the director of the NSA in 2014, when the Troll Factory started lighting up social media in The United States and didn't do jack ****. He might be crying "my authority" to cover his ass for doing nothing, then.