• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Comey memos will remain secret for now, judge rules - Politico

Probably the same thing that happened to his opinions on Benghazi. Disappeared when he realized it wasn't going anywhere. Mueller's investigation though, that's not going away.

Mueller's investigation might not go away, like the Benghazi one, but it will never amount to anything.
 
Mueller's investigation might not go away, like the Benghazi one, but it will never amount to anything.

I can think of 4 last names that would beg to differ.
 
I can think of 4 last names that would beg to differ.

Face it, Trump was too savvy to break such obvious rules and laws. If they haven't got it by now, they never will.
 
A few things. The memo is the product of a House oversight investigation, its not the opinion of one man.
The House oversight committee had access to subpoenaed DOJ and FBI documents which included the FBIs FISA application to the FISC court

I distinctly remember hearing it reported that only a few select people got access to the support evidence for that memo. Not the entire committee. Are you saying that's untrue and those documents are what was made available to the entire house?

Remember, Nunez had to threaten to hold Rosenstein and Wray in contempt of Congress to get the FBI and DOJ to turn these documents over.

Oh yes im very aware of the slow roll tactic they employed. It's a continued practice from the Obama era.

Next, the memo was read by Wray before it was released to the public, and if it contained any inconsistencies and or fabrictions, he would have let us know

Actually, he would have called a immediate press conference and exposed it as a partisan hit piece filled with lies.
Wray did not want that memo released, neither did the DOJ

He did sorta do that but in a halfass way, which makes his objections suspect. We are in put up or shut up territory. Same goes for Nunez too though. A memo stating his opinions without providing the supporting evidence is not good enough. I need convincing.

Next, the memo was read by other House members, and even a few Democrats before it was released to the public, which gave the Democrats and a few RINO's plenty of time to come up with a decent rebuttal
They have yet to offer up a effective counter argument, because there isn't one.

Fair point. It's not proof but it is suspicious that they don't have a legitimate counter argument debunking the content of the memo.

Next, it basically just confirms what people already knew, what they already suspected.
Back in April CNN posted a article about the FBI using the dossier to bolster their investigation and to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

True

Ive posted that article numerous times on this forum, its old news, the memo just confirmed it

Next, so far 6 senior Obama era FBI and DOJ officials have either been dismissed, demoted or reasigned and this all happened prior to the memo's release.

Everyone of them had a some connection to the dossier, to Fusion GPS, or were part of the FISA process that led to the surveillance and some of them were mentioned by name in the memo

The memo's not only accurate, its just the tip of the iceberg. The IGs report when its released, will be far more comprehensive and descriptive and the House intel committee is already talking about releasing their next memo.

I'm very interested in the release of the IG report. Hopefully that report will show evidence to support thier conclusions.



Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
I'm impressed by your willful ignorance and zealous devotion to the Democratic party Its twisted sure, but impressive.

I'm impressed by your willful ignorance and zealous devotion to Trump. It's twisted for sure, but not unexpected.

This is more rabid right rhetoric, we have seen it before- Obama was 'the most unconstitutional President- EVER!!!!!' :roll:

Year of empty rants and meaningless votes... I don't doubt if there was anything illegal done by someone not kneeling before Trump, Jefferson Sessions would be all over it so save your huffing and puffing until charges are offered... :peace
 
How's Pizzagate and Uranium One coming along?

Those two diversions are yesterdays diversions. New game plan, have GOP stooge come up with half ass facts in a memo. Oooh kids don't look at Mueller, look at this memo, the FBI is picking on me!!:lamo. Its the Hail Mary pass, Gates flipped, they got money laundering on Trump.
 
Face it, Trump was too savvy to break such obvious rules and laws. If they haven't got it by now, they never will.

You give trump far too much credit, he has proven more than once he is not nearly the genius he claims to be.
 
You give trump far too much credit, he has proven more than once he is not nearly the genius he claims to be.

Hey now, don't say that. Trump is a very stable genius.
 
Comey's testimony to Rep Radcliffe.....


For such a ethical and principled guy he sure has no problem perjuring himself in front of Congress

B.S.! The only person testifying there was the prosecutor. Lying to congress is a crime. If Comey were guilty of that he'd already have been charged.
 
B.S.! The only person testifying there was the prosecutor. Lying to congress is a crime. If Comey were guilty of that he'd already have been charged.

Radcliffe was lying ? He asked Comey a question.
When did you decide to exonerate Hillary Clinton ? Was it before or after she was interviewed.

Comey answered " after ". Comey lied, he perjured himself infront of Congress
 
Back
Top Bottom