• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump makes 'Pocahontas' crack at event honoring Navajo [W:313]

ReverendHellh0und said:
nope, I never did any such thing. I said trump mentioned her at that time because he thought he was among like minded people who think fake indians are bad. That's about it.
Click to expand...

Lmao. Yep that's why you brought up irrelevant claims that she's not a real Indian, and a plethora (that's a new word for you) of other irrelevant items trying to argue that she's not a real Indian.

Full. Defense. Mode.

Again: Was Elizabeth Warren relevant to a non-partisan event honoring code talkers?

Yes or no answer.


Sent from Donald's hair using Putin's Blackerry.
 
Hatuey said:
Lmao. Yep that's why you brought up irrelevant claims that she's not a real Indian, and a plethora (that's a new word for you) of other irrelevant items trying to argue that she's not a real Indian.

Full. Defense. Mode.

Again: Was Elizabeth Warren relevant to a non-partisan event honoring code talkers?

Yes or no answer.


Sent from Donald's hair using Putin's Blackerry.
Click to expand...




You said:

"you've been arguing that the reason Trump talked about her was because she was relevant to real Indians."


I never said that.


you then ask me the question:

"Was Elizabeth Warren relevant to a non-partisan event honoring code talkers?"


you act like this was your argument and I was arguing that she was. I've told you the relevance which is none more than once other than trump to use the event to mock someone pretending to be of the people he's honoring.



I'm not quite sure why you are all wierdly hyper at me about this. is it because you believe your own made up position you gave me that I never held?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
You said:

"you've been arguing that the reason Trump talked about her was because she was relevant to real Indians."


I never said that.


you then ask me the question:

"Was Elizabeth Warren relevant to a non-partisan event honoring code talkers?"


you act like this was your argument and I was arguing that she was. I've told you the relevance which is none more than once other than trump to use the event to mock someone pretending to be of the people he's honoring.



I'm not quite sure why you are all wierdly hyper at me about this. is it because you believe your own made up position you gave me that I never held?
Click to expand...

I didn't state it was a literal statement. I clearly paraphrased (that's a new word too!) all of the bull**** you've posted trying to defend Trump and trying to show why Warren was relevant. You even tried making similes with other ethnic groups! Again, for the last time:

Was mentioning Elizabeth Warren, at a non-partisan event she was not connected to, relevant?

Yes or no answer.


Sent from Donald's hair using Putin's Blackerry.
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
***sigh*** I know media created a stink over this nothingness..... you really think trump is so smart that he would plan this on purpose? Do you think that picture hangs there because trump hates indians>?
Click to expand...

Yes, I think he did it on purpose because he's a racist bully. Trump doesn't like Indians anymore than he likes Hispanics, Muslims, Blacks, LGTBs, women, disabled, vets, etc, etc, etc. Why you defend that POS is beyond reason.
 
Middleground said:
How do you know that?
Click to expand...

Here is something you might find interesting. This is the an honest perspective from another Native American on "Think Progress". Warren is a dishonest fake that has done nothing for Native Americans.

https://thinkprogress.org/elizabeth-warren-is-not-cherokee-c1ec6c91b696/

As a young Cherokee woman, one would assume that I would take Warren’s side in standing up against Trump’s racist remark. Following the incident, Warren lambasted the president, telling MSNBC that Trump has done “this over and over thinking somehow he’s going to shut me up with it. It hadn’t worked in the past, it is not going to work in the future.”

A real Native American hero, right?

Wrong.

She was not a hero to me when she failed to foster a haven of support for Native students within Harvard University’s alienating Ivy League culture. She is not a hero for spending years awkwardly avoiding Native leaders. She is not a hero because, despite claiming to be the only Native woman in the U.S. Senate, she has done nothing to advance our rights.

She is not from us. She does not represent us. She is not Cherokee.
Click to expand...

To add insult to injury, despite Warren’s public claims of Native American heritage, she has decidedly avoided talking with Native leaders and, in 2012, refused to meet with a group of Cherokee women at the Democratic National Convention.
Click to expand...

The ariticle is dated " Nov 30, 2017, 11:44 am Updated: Nov 30, 2017, 1:16 pm" and is written by Rebecca Nagle.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Holy ****..... /facepalm


What is it with you lefties having to make yourselves look so dumb to try to win an argument. I know you are not dumb, come on man.


he was mocking a fake indian while in company of real indians. it's not really that confusing for you is it?
Click to expand...

Why was he mocking a political opponent at a ceremony to honour WW2 vets? That's the question. It's like that cringe-worthy speach at the Boy Scouts ceremony.
Why does your boy feel free to engage in juvenile mockery when the subject is supposed to be acknowledging the heroism of men who served with honour?
 
NonoBadDog said:
Here is something you might find interesting. This is the an honest perspective from another Native American on "Think Progress". Warren is a dishonest fake that has done nothing for Native Americans.

https://thinkprogress.org/elizabeth-warren-is-not-cherokee-c1ec6c91b696/





The ariticle is dated " Nov 30, 2017, 11:44 am Updated: Nov 30, 2017, 1:16 pm" and is written by Rebecca Nagle.
Click to expand...



Are you familiar with the difference between an oped and an article baed-on facts? Seems like you do not know the difference.

Honestly, I don't give a rat's ass about the opinion of one Native American.
 
Middleground said:
Are you familiar with the difference between an oped and an article baed-on facts? Seems like you do not know the difference.

Honestly, I don't give a rat's ass about the opinion of one Native American.
Click to expand...

We knew that already. You just want the Native Americans to be good little Native Americans to shut up about how they feel about Warren, even if they are liberal Native Americans. Got it, thanks.
 
NonoBadDog said:
We knew that already. You just want the Native Americans to be good little Native Americans to shut up about how they feel about Warren, even if they are liberal Native Americans. Got it, thanks.
Click to expand...

FYI, a common trait that I have noticed about you is that you seem to take a statement and turn it into something exaggerated. So let me correct you. Just because I think the opinion of the op-ed Native writer is completely unfair and off the mark, it does not mean that I think all Native American should shut the hell up. I just disagree with the writer of that piece. Does that make sense or do you want to take it further?
 
Grand Mal said:
Why was he mocking a political opponent at a ceremony to honour WW2 vets? That's the question. It's like that cringe-worthy speach at the Boy Scouts ceremony.
Why does your boy feel free to engage in juvenile mockery when the subject is supposed to be acknowledging the heroism of men who served with honour?
Click to expand...

True. This was not the proper venue to bring politics into it.

It would have been just as out of place if he decided to bring up the recent sport team's mascot uproar.

Everything always has to be about him.
 
Middleground said:
FYI, a common trait that I have noticed about you is that you seem to take a statement and turn it into something exaggerated. So let me correct you. Just because I think the opinion of the op-ed Native writer is completely unfair and off the mark, it does not mean that I think all Native American should shut the hell up. I just disagree with the writer of that piece. Does that make sense or do you want to take it further?
Click to expand...

What...ever. I offered other opinion pieces from other leaders in the Native American community. Think whatever you want. I don't care.
 
Middleground said:
FYI, a common trait that I have noticed about you is that you seem to take a statement and turn it into something exaggerated. So let me correct you. Just because I think the opinion of the op-ed Native writer is completely unfair and off the mark, it does not mean that I think all Native American should shut the hell up. I just disagree with the writer of that piece. Does that make sense or do you want to take it further?
Click to expand...

What...ever. I offered other opinion pieces from other leaders in the Native American community. Think whatever you want. I don't care.
 
Jetboogieman said:
Should have known all I was going to get in return was a mountain unintelligible crap.
Click to expand...
I realize answering each of your responses may have been information overload... so we have done Point 1...
Let us move FORWARD TOGETHER... to Point 2:


Point 2:

You wrote:
No not a fighter, a snowflake who explodes at the slightest amount of criticism leveled against him with childish insults in the form of tweets, the zenith of political discourse
Click to expand...


I replied:

Those tweets are effective. It’s why you complain so. It cuts right through the media like a razor blade. If you could, and you’re trying desperately with your rhetoric... you’d censor his tweets out of existence.

The whining, triggered snowflakes do not bother Trump.
Click to expand...

So what did you want to correct about that bit of rebuttal.
 
Breaking it down in manageable bites for you... we’re on to replying to your Response #3:

Jetboogieman said:
Trump is pro one thing and that's Trump.
Click to expand...

We are individuals, and look out for our own best interests, because in most cases, nobody else will. If you think government will, well... you’re in for much disappointment, and it’s no wonder Commicrats aren’t just disappointed, but angry and even violent.

You’re assumption about Trump is wrong though. Trump has accomplished much in life, unlike Obama... who really accomplished nothing much, and as President... it looks like his entire 8-years has produced a legacy of 9 Trillion of debt, class warfare, letting ISIS flourish, floods of illegal immigration, and being a coward and bad negotiator.

Trump has proven already to be pro-American, and a hard worker on behalf of the American people. He’s produced results.

I understand, you being a Commicrat, and growing up in a segregated society, that you’re somewhat repulsed by Liberty. But... favoring one group over another isn’t Liberty... it’s divisive.
 
Last edited:
Rogue Valley said:
Elizabeth Warren didn't claim minority status on law school application, records show
Click to expand...

The fraud earned her moniker. And Democrats made sure it stuck.
There is no dispute that Warren formally notified officials at the University of Pennsylvania and then Harvard claiming Native American heritage after she was hired.

At a time when law schools faced public pressure to show greater ethnic diversity within their faculty, the university’s Crimson newspaper quoted a law school spokesman in 1996 saying Warren was Native American.

The Boston Globe followed the Herald with a report that the Association of American Law Schools listed Warren as a minority law teacher each year from 1986 to 1994. In that time, Warren went from being a law professor at the University of Texas, to the University of Pennsylvania, and finally in 1995 to Harvard University.

The facts behind Elizabeth Warren, her claimed Native American ties and Trump's 'Pocahontas' insult | PolitiFact
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom