• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Gun-Control Legislation That Even Republicans Like

why should I do something I have already done and which you have failed to do despite your frantic posting history since you joined this board?

Don't EVER ask me for evidence. LOL
 
I think the more laws we have the less enforcement we have. There are simply too many laws designed to harass honest gun owners and pressure cooker owners that the police and the public ignore them.

My god we have the most lax gun laws in the world
 
Don't EVER ask me for evidence. LOL

of course not, you never supply any

rather we get crap like this

ITS A HUGE SUCCESS

IT WORKS GREAT

IT PREVENTS CRIME
 
of course not, you never supply any

rather we get crap like this

ITS A HUGE SUCCESS

IT WORKS GREAT

IT PREVENTS CRIME

The capitalization makes all the difference. Crayons would help, too.
 
of course not, you never supply any

rather we get crap like this

ITS A HUGE SUCCESS

IT WORKS GREAT

IT PREVENTS CRIME

Now you are getting it. Welcome aboard!
 
Easy access to guns is a MAJOR problem in this country. You wouldn't want to vote me into any public office, because my personal view is to revoke Amendment 2. Adios to all guns. But I'm a realist, and understand that, although this will happen at some point, it won't be in my lifetime. So a simple ADIOS to assault weapons will have to be the settlement.

Of all the dumb laws the banners propose, the assault weapons bans are probably the worst. They are based solely on appearance. I can go to my local full service gun store, order parts for an AW and the shop will assemble it while I go pick up ammo and a case. Order a walnut sporting stock , paint the gun white, subtract a few bolt on accessories and the gun is no longer an assault weapon. Conversely, grab a .22 plinker, add a few bolt ons, and bingo, a full assault weapon.
 
then explain why the group in the USA that has the highest rate of legal gun ownership doesn't have gun crime rates statically different from the similar groups in Canada and England

Ten or so major geographical areas in the US are the major source of violent crime in the US. All have near total gun bans and all are Democrat controlled. It's the fault of outlying areas, Indiana, Virginia, that criminals kill in Chicago, NYC, Atlanta.
 
Ten or so major geographical areas in the US are the major source of violent crime in the US. All have near total gun bans and all are Democrat controlled. It's the fault of outlying areas, Indiana, Virginia, that criminals kill in Chicago, NYC, Atlanta.

Uh....the most gun deaths are in states with lax gun laws
 
Banning bump stocks is useless. Any middle school kid can make one in shop class. ( that is if shop classes still excited).

Ever wonder why after the Boston marathon bombing no one called to ban pressure cookers? How many rounds does it get off on the warm setting?

I can easily make a bump stock, but a pressure cooker would be far more difficult.

Background checks are just feel good legislation and a waste of time and money.

What a dumbass analogy. Do you need a license to carry that pressure cooker ? How many rounds does your slow cooker hold? Sound stupid? Almost as dumb as your wacko analogy.
 
Uh....the most gun deaths are in states with lax gun laws

not gun crimes. You are pretending that suicides should count and guess what, those "lax" gun laws are not the reason why suicides are higher

the places with the MOST CRIMINAL GUN DEATHS are DEMOCRAT RUN anti gun areas like Chicago, DC, LA, BALTIMORE etc
 
not gun crimes. You are pretending that suicides should count and guess what, those "lax" gun laws are not the reason why suicides are higher

the places with the MOST CRIMINAL GUN DEATHS are DEMOCRAT RUN anti gun areas like Chicago, DC, LA, BALTIMORE etc

And your evidence is ....wait for it folks.....NADA. LOL
 
And your evidence is ....wait for it folks.....NADA. LOL

the evidence that the majority of gunshot murders take place in Democrat cities has been posted so many times I have lost count.

you know that is true which is why you dishonestly try to pretend suicides prove states without idiotic gun laws are less "safe". the fact is, the areas with Democrat gun laws are the murder capitals of the USA
 
the evidence that the majority of gunshot murders take place in Democrat cities has been posted so many times I have lost count.

you know that is true which is why you dishonestly try to pretend suicides prove states without idiotic gun laws are less "safe". the fact is, the areas with Democrat gun laws are the murder capitals of the USA

Most gun deaths are in REPUBLICAN states. FACT
 
So?

And Japan leads the world in suicide despite their firearms restrictions.

One thing you seem to have overlooked is that there are only 3 or 4 nations in the world with a "Second Amendment" enshrined in their Constitutions, and none of those that you listed are among them....in addition, those countries you mentioned still have violent crime....removing or restricting firearms did not end it.

Why is it the anti second amendment groupies always go straight to 'but, but, but....other countries" ? :roll:

England used to have it in their constitution, but were smart enough to remove it.
 
then explain why the group in the USA that has the highest rate of legal gun ownership doesn't have gun crime rates statically different from the similar groups in Canada and England

LOL! Prove it.
 
LOL! Prove it.

if you are unwilling to actually understand obvious and basic facts in the gun control debate, its really not worth trying to educate you given those facts have been posted on the gun forum dozens of times

so when you say 'prove it' its not that you don't believe it but rather you are unable to counter those facts but you feel a need to try to respond and counter facts that the gun banning movement finds uncomfortable. one of the most devastating facts for the gun banning movement is that its claim that access to legal firearms increases gun crime is completely belied by the various ethnic groups in the USA. the group with the highest rate of legal gun ownership (and thus the highest access to legal firearms) are whites and they have a far far lower rate of gun violence than hispanics and blacks. Blacks, who have the highest rate of gun violence, have the lowest rate of legal gun ownership and are more likely to live in areas with severe gun laws than whites.
 
if you are unwilling to actually understand obvious and basic facts in the gun control debate, its really not worth trying to educate you given those facts have been posted on the gun forum dozens of times

so when you say 'prove it' its not that you don't believe it but rather you are unable to counter those facts but you feel a need to try to respond and counter facts that the gun banning movement finds uncomfortable. one of the most devastating facts for the gun banning movement is that its claim that access to legal firearms increases gun crime is completely belied by the various ethnic groups in the USA. the group with the highest rate of legal gun ownership (and thus the highest access to legal firearms) are whites and they have a far far lower rate of gun violence than hispanics and blacks. Blacks, who have the highest rate of gun violence, have the lowest rate of legal gun ownership and are more likely to live in areas with severe gun laws than whites.

States with the highest gun ownership have the most gun deaths
 
States with the highest gun ownership have the most gun deaths

not relevant to this discussion suicides have nothing to do with crime control and the fraudulent claim that restrictions on honest gun owners is crime control
 
not relevant to this discussion suicides have nothing to do with crime control and the fraudulent claim that restrictions on honest gun owners is crime control

Dead is dead. And facts are facts. You lose
 
England used to have it in their constitution, but were smart enough to remove it.

Oh yes, better to be a royal subject than a free citizen. :roll:

I understand that immigrating to the UK isn't that hard.....let me know if you need help with a plane ticket.
 
Back
Top Bottom