• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women On Clinton And Sanders Campaigns Allege Sexual Harassment

zimmer

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Lilian Adams and Zoey Jordan Salsbury were teenagers when they started working on opposite sides of the 2016 Democratic presidential primary. Adams, then 19, joined Hillary Clinton’s campaign and Salsbury, then 18, joined Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign. They were ready to make the world a better place by helping to elect their candidate.

Adams said she dealt with this harassment for months...

But even after her abuser was fired, his work with the party — and the campaign — wasn’t over. In October 2016, Adams said she discovered to her astonishment that he had been rehired the previous month to work on the campaign with a different state party.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...sexual-harassment_us_5a0dfdf2e4b045cf43705417
Click to expand...

The Leftist circular firing squad is drifting from Hollywood to Washington DC...
 
Abuser got fired. Working as intended.
 
jmotivator said:
Wow, you couldn't even manage to finish reading the OP synopsis, eh?
Click to expand...

I did read it.

I'm not sure what you think should have been done differently. Guy went to a different state. Do you think he told the new employer why he got fired?
 
Deuce said:
I did read it.

I'm not sure what you think should have been done differently. Guy went to a different state. Do you think he told the new employer why he got fired?
Click to expand...

The New employer was the old employer. :roll:
 
jmotivator said:
The New employer was the old employer. :roll:
Click to expand...

Kindof. But how sure are we that this level of communication and coordination regarding low level employees would be exist between independent campaigns in different states? Now, if I were trying to get rehired after being fired for something like that... or fired for any serious reason, for that matter, I wouldn't even put the old employer on my resume at all.

Basically, this would come down to whether or not there was a nation-wide database of employees readily accessible by anyone hiring for any position for the Democratic party. As I see it, here are the possibilities:

1) That detail of information at that level of employee isn't tracked in a nationally-accessible form.
2) The new employer simply didn't think to check for that information because the abuser never told them he'd previously worked for the Democratic Party
3) The new employer did check, discovered he was sexually harassing other employees, and for some bizarre reason chose to hire him anyway.

Now, you think all Democrats are evil and therefore only number 3 even exists to you. But is that really the most likely situation?
 
Deuce said:
Kindof. But how sure are we that this level of communication and coordination regarding low level employees would be exist between independent campaigns in different states? Now, if I were trying to get rehired after being fired for something like that... or fired for any serious reason, for that matter, I wouldn't even put the old employer on my resume at all.

Basically, this would come down to whether or not there was a nation-wide database of employees readily accessible by anyone hiring for any position for the Democratic party. As I see it, here are the possibilities:

1) That detail of information at that level of employee isn't tracked in a nationally-accessible form.
2) The new employer simply didn't think to check for that information because the abuser never told them he'd previously worked for the Democratic Party
3) The new employer did check, discovered he was sexually harassing other employees, and for some bizarre reason chose to hire him anyway.

Now, you think all Democrats are evil and therefore only number 3 even exists to you. But is that really the most likely situation?
Click to expand...

I reject your hypothesis because this woman was able to discover that he had been hired by the DNC in another state. Do you think she has more HR access than, say, DNC HR?
 
jmotivator said:
I reject your hypothesis because this woman was able to discover that he had been hired by the DNC in another state. Do you think she has more HR access than, say, DNC HR?
Click to expand...

I have no information as to how this was discovered. For all I know it was via Facebook.
 
Deuce said:
I have no information as to how this was discovered. For all I know it was via Facebook.
Click to expand...

So in your mind the national DNC organization is just a random distribution of disconnected organizations? 2016 results might be the best evidence for your argument.

Though I would still argue that it is more likely that the DNC keeps better control of its national organization than that. I mean the power of the Obama campaign system was a massive and coordinated effort by all facets of the DNC machine down to national coordination of door knock efforts... did that all go *poof* when he left office?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom