• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: "Russians"Offered To ‘Send Five Women’ to Trump’s Moscow Hotel Room

WTF is that supposed to mean?

It means hatred has corroded a lot of people’s souls.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
MaggieD said:
The system is not flawed. Without the electoral college just a few populace dense states would be electing the POTUS. We are a Republic not a democracy. We are not governed by “majority rules.”

I never said anything about any of that. Changing the electoral college system wouldn't fix the issue, as far as I can tell. Even if we had ditched the EC before the election and elected Clinton as a result, the problem would remain.

MaggieD said:
Further, comparing the rollup to war to a presidential election simply doesn’t hold water.

Did you read what I said about this? This is a matter of simple logic. Your post depended on a principle: what works as designed is <insert whatever affirmatory predicate you like here--good, fine, not bad, etc.>. But that principle is clearly false--plenty of bad stuff has come about by design. No other properties in the domains being compared matter, or should be considered. I'm pretty sure I was clear about that.
 
There was no cyber victory of the United States election in 2016. The people spoke. The system worked exactly as it was designed to work. It’s just that those who perceive themselves as “the good guys” lost.

great, the next time you will get Bernie Sanders as your President with China support ...
 
I never said anything about any of that. Changing the electoral college system wouldn't fix the issue, as far as I can tell. Even if we had ditched the EC before the election and elected Clinton as a result, the problem would remain.

Did you read what I said about this? This is a matter of simple logic. Your post depended on a principle: what works as designed is <insert whatever affirmatory predicate you like here--good, fine, not bad, etc.>. But that principle is clearly false--plenty of bad stuff has come about by design. No other properties in the domains being compared matter, or should be considered. I'm pretty sure I was clear about that.

And your solution is...
 
great, the next time you will get Bernie Sanders as your President with China support ...

Unless we are willing to shred our constitution, which we aren’t, other countries’ propaganda will continue to influence the uninformed among us. We do it to them. Why on earth would you be mortified that they do it to us?
 
Piss tape is real!

One day they'll find it.

30223b90e9047465d5812f4f27e9960b.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom