• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sebastian Gorka suggests Hillary Clinton should be tried for treason, executed over Uranium One deal

Its was a name used as part of a religious sect but it turned into a pejorative for koreans.

I live and work among the most heavily Korean area outside of Korea and I've never heard that term used racially even once.
 
Despite Gorka being himself for a few moments, its surprising to see that you are overlooking that he is actually right. Not so much about the possible execution aspect of punishment, but he does have a point that she should be set to stand trial for what she had a part in while she held that position.

Still using him as a source is far more credible then CNN, or The Young Turks at the very least.

LOL Yes the trading hands from Canada to Russia of less than 2% of our yearly uranium needs is a huge deal. I have never seen such a fuss over a nothing burger and a 6 year old one too. Can you say moldy?

sources.jpg
 
Bribery, pay to play, treason, dereliction for starters.

That sounds just like Muellers list of charges for Trump and the indictments have already begun. Perhaps you should get back to the real world. You know the one with 3 active Grand Juries.
 
Despite Gorka being himself for a few moments, its surprising to see that you are overlooking that he is actually right. Not so much about the possible execution aspect of punishment, but he does have a point that she should be set to stand trial for what she had a part in while she held that position.

Still using him as a source is far more credible then CNN, or The Young Turks at the very least.

No part of the Uranium One deal constitutes treason. That's ****ing stupid.
 
Despite Gorka being himself for a few moments, its surprising to see that you are overlooking that he is actually right. Not so much about the possible execution aspect of punishment, but he does have a point that she should be set to stand trial for what she had a part in while she held that position.

Still using him as a source is far more credible then CNN, or The Young Turks at the very least.


The GOP should have hired Mueller to get an indictment against Hillary, he is a fast worker.
 
Pretty clear that Russia is the US's primary global rival. Also pretty clear that Russia is unlikely to do anything that would be in the US' interests. Yeah, Romney had it right, and the leftists laughed.

So how does it make any sense in the least to have Russia control 20% if the is uranium? How is that in the nation's best interests?

And now, that uranium is begin shipped out of the country via Canada to parts unknown.

At the same time as the deal, all of a sudden $140M is donated to the Clinton Foundation and Bill does a $500K speech in Moscow.

We have now found Obama's DOJ putting a gag order on a witness / whistle blower to corruption and bribery surrounding the deal, and we have the FBI being called off of investigating that corruption and bribery.

Err. Something's not right here. Yes, it needs to be investigated.
 
Despite Gorka being himself for a few moments, its surprising to see that you are overlooking that he is actually right. Not so much about the possible execution aspect of punishment, but he does have a point that she should be set to stand trial for what she had a part in while she held that position.

Still using him as a source is far more credible then CNN, or The Young Turks at the very least.
That's true -- except for the fact that Mrs. Clinton committed no crimes that she could be prosecuted. I do remember a particular presidential candidate saying that if he was elected, he would lock her up. Since that hasn't happened, even he knows there are no chargeable crimes.

Just as an aside, we can't prosecute and jail people because those in power don't like her -- at least not yet.
 
The entire Clinton uranium non-issue is a clear distraction by the White House press office Fox News, to distract from, Trump's ominous scandal.
 
Translation: "do NOT look at Manafort and Gates."
 
Despite Gorka being himself for a few moments, its surprising to see that you are overlooking that he is actually right. Not so much about the possible execution aspect of punishment, but he does have a point that she should be set to stand trial for what she had a part in while she held that position.

Still using him as a source is far more credible then CNN, or The Young Turks at the very least.

What's the crime? And Hillary didn't sign away that uranium, which cannot leave the U.S., because she doesn't have any authority over approving the deal. She was head of one of many agencies that were required to opine on the sale, none objected (including ALL our intelligence agencies on that committee), and Obama approved it. To believe there was a crime is to believe that multiple agencies engaged in treason, which is absurd.

Gorka and the right wing are trying to convince Trump lemmings that a policy disagreement (should we have allowed that sale to proceed) into treason. There's literally no basis for it. Even if we assume for this purpose Hillary was bought off, why did the intelligence agencies all also sign off, the Pentagon, and others? Who and how were they corrupted?

This BS red herring asserts, in effect, that everyone on the list engaged in or facilitated treason:

That said, the possibility that a foreign entity would take a majority stake in the uranium operation meant that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, had to approve the deal. So did the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Utah’s nuclear regulator.

The membership of CFIUS includes the State Department, meaning that the Secretary of State would have had a voice. The panel also includes the attorney general and the secretaries of the Treasury (who chairs the committee), Defense, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
 
For those who have been obsessing about the Alexandria VA church that is supposedly "tearing down" Washington and Robert E Lee monuments, here's another factual story from the Washington Times, also known as the "Moonie Times"

Yep, a guy who got booted from the White House owing to his shady connections with a neo-Nazi group in his homeland of Hungary should always be seen as a reliable source. :roll:


Oh, that Sean guy is such a comedian, always the best entertainment. :monkey:2dance::monkey

Wow, Gorka is one of the biggest idiots out there. Mr. connected to Nazi's should keep his "v." mouth shut and not make stupid comments.
 
Wow, Gorka is one of the biggest idiots out there. Mr. connected to Nazi's should keep his "v." mouth shut and not make stupid comments.

That's exactly what those who dont think "Right" are told to do.

With stiff penatlies for non compliance increasingly.

Because we suck now.

INCREASINGLY
 
O, what was going on at the time? You seem to think its critical to your belief that Hillary committed treason. thanks in advance

You know the Obama administration didn't have very good relations with the Russians right?
I mean the sanctions, the actions to limit nearly everything they did in or around our country. That also goes for physically kicking them out of property they legally owned as well.

I'm agreeing with the fact that there should be an investigation, and make sure that everything was on the up & up.

If people are so adamant about not following this process, then I guess that must mean they are onto something with this uranium issue.
 
LOL! And what, pray tell, should she stand trial for? Please be very precise.

Seeing as you find Gorka credible, I won't hold my breath.

Bribery, pay to play, treason, dereliction for starters.

You see, this is what happens when I go away for a day... beating me to the punch.
 
LOL! And what, pray tell, should she stand trial for? Please be very precise.

Seeing as you find Gorka credible, I won't hold my breath.

Wow, you're really easy to trigger. I see you're suffering from short-term memory loss, probably by accidentally shooting yourself in the head with one of your beloved guns. So let me remind you of my original question which you keep dodging:

What danger does the uranium deal pose to the United States?

...do you even know what uranium is? Or how its mistreatment can lead to third world countries, or more rogue states?

I mean, I shouldn't be surprised with this seeing with who I am conversing with.

But do you really not know?
 
LOL! And what, pray tell, should she stand trial for? Please be very precise.

Seeing as you find Gorka credible, I won't hold my breath.

LOL Yes the trading hands from Canada to Russia of less than 2% of our yearly uranium needs is a huge deal. I have never seen such a fuss over a nothing burger and a 6 year old one too. Can you say moldy?

sources.jpg

Your missing the point, we are talking about bribery as well as a litany of other illegal actions here that Hillary possibly took part in.

The supply does not necessarily matter here, its what has been done in the pursuit of said supply.
 
No part of the Uranium One deal constitutes treason. That's ****ing stupid.

Bribery in service to a foreign power, especially if it comes at the detriment to your own country can be considered treason.

Though that is not all she should be investigated for, and my term would be a long stretch of the laws coverage. That wouldn't be the first time the government would overstretch to try, and prove something.
 
Your missing the point, we are talking about bribery as well as a litany of other illegal actions here that Hillary possibly took part in.

The supply does not necessarily matter here, its what has been done in the pursuit of said supply.

There is no quid pro quo and this deal was approved by 8 other Depts. besides State. There is no bribery either. This was a private deal between a Canadian and a Russian company for a minuscule part of our uranium needs. Denying this to Russia could have jeopardized Russian cooperation with the U.N. sanctions on Iran that brought them to the table. I'de say we gained far more than we, no Canada lost, a measley 2% of our yearly needs.
Compared to the fact we learned today about Trump it is a pathetic joke of a case.. Trump knew about the Russians hacking the DNC and them having "dirt " on Hillary in APRIL 2016! He has been lying all this time about it and a Trump "foreign policy adviser has pleaded guilty to colluding with the Russians to effect the election. How does that make you feel? Does thinking about "crooked Hillary" really take you mind off this news like Trump thinks it will?
 
Last edited:
...do you even know what uranium is? Or how its mistreatment can lead to third world countries, or more rogue states?

I mean, I shouldn't be surprised with this seeing with who I am conversing with.

But do you really not know?

You know, I'm going to say this one last time.

The uranium deal you think was so criminal had and still has safeguards built into it to track where the uranium is shipped. As much as you want to believe that HRC and the Obama administration want or don't care if enemies get their hands on uranium, it's just not true.

I'm sorry, but I'm not buying your untruths.
 
There is no quid pro quo and this deal was approved by 8 other Depts. besides State. There is no bribery either. This was a private deal between a Canadian and a Russian company for a minuscule part of our uranium needs. Denying this to Russia could have jeopardized Russian cooperation with the U.N. sanctions on Iran that brought them to the table. I'de say we gained far more than we, no Canada lost, a measley 2% of our yearly needs.
Compared to the fact we learned today about Trump it is a joke. Trump knew about the Russians hacking the DNC and them having "dirt " on Hillary in APRIL 2016! He has been lying all this time about it. How does that make you feel?

How did you not know about that until today?

Even Bernie new about crap going on with the DNC, and that was a joke to begin with. Don't set your password as "password" everyone should know that.

Not to mention them having dirt on Hillary is some of the oldest news out there. So does that also mean that we can pull a red flag on the DNC for using what sources they did to dig up dirt on Trump.

This is not new news.
 
How did you not know about that until today?

Even Bernie new about crap going on with the DNC, and that was a joke to begin with. Don't set your password as "password" everyone should know that.

Not to mention them having dirt on Hillary is some of the oldest news out there. So does that also mean that we can pull a red flag on the DNC for using what sources they did to dig up dirt on Trump.

This is not new news.

LOL Indictments and guilty pleas are not old news. Funny how all this time and Hillary has NEVER been indicted for ANYTHING. Because it is nothing but lies and innuendos and there is no case. Mueller has had no trouble taking Trump people in front of a Grand Jury, because they are all as guilty as sin and not too smart either.
 
What's the crime? And Hillary didn't sign away that uranium, which cannot leave the U.S., because she doesn't have any authority over approving the deal. She was head of one of many agencies that were required to opine on the sale, none objected (including ALL our intelligence agencies on that committee), and Obama approved it. To believe there was a crime is to believe that multiple agencies engaged in treason, which is absurd.

Gorka and the right wing are trying to convince Trump lemmings that a policy disagreement (should we have allowed that sale to proceed) into treason. There's literally no basis for it. Even if we assume for this purpose Hillary was bought off, why did the intelligence agencies all also sign off, the Pentagon, and others? Who and how were they corrupted?

This BS red herring asserts, in effect, that everyone on the list engaged in or facilitated treason:

Aside from bribery, pay to play (which is a term I am starting to really hate now) there are only a few more crimes that could contend with it.

Gorka is a bit off on the punishment, though it would be good to finally be put in that cell she's been earning.
 
Back
Top Bottom