• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Time I Got Recruited to Collude with the Russians

Last time RAMOSS, prove what ??

The Clintion with held information she was asked to provide. You make insinuations, you made claims, you have not backed that up
 
What I'm telling you, is that no one has confirmed that the Russian government is directly responsible.
Yes because you are privy to highly classified information.

What I am telling you is that multitude of Senate and House Republicans feel the information suggesting Russia interference is solid enough that they have launched their own investigations.

That is a simple fact that your spin can not deny.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
Yes because you are privy to highly classified information.

What I am telling you is that multitude of Senate and House Republicans feel the information suggesting Russia interference is solid enough that they have launched their own investigations.

That is a simple fact that your spin can not deny.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Those investigations don't have a damn thing to do with investigating Russian hacking.
 
Those investigations don't have a damn thing to do with investigating Russian hacking.
It has to do with Russian interference which includes hacking of RNC, DNC, and states non-vote tallying systems. It also includes leak investigations and other related concern to the entire cluster.

Where the f are you getting your eronious information from?

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
The Clintion with held information she was asked to provide. You make insinuations, you made claims, you have not backed that up

If she had turned over emails to the first hearing, as asked, we'd have known of her secret server in Sep. 2014 and not nearly a year later.
 
If she had turned over emails to the first hearing, as asked, we'd have known of her secret server in Sep. 2014 and not nearly a year later.

And, show where she was asked to specifically do that. Do you understand that when going through an audit, you specifically give then information that is asked to be provided??? That would be the process I would follow in that situation.
 
First I was responding to another poster so many 'duds' when it suits the right wing, but they sucked down Trump's birther BS when it suited them.

Next, it is waaaaayyy too early to claim any of this is a dud. If you were alive during Watergate it took a lot of time and work to produce that 'gun'.

I'd opine there would be multiple 'guns' on the table if the rabid right didn't control all branches of government.So if the rabid right's 'champion' continues to push a lie to smear the President that's 'pretty slick' but investigate a President who has the self control, of a spoiled brat and punk bully we need to 'get real here'...

Yeah he is a step or two below even bad alter boy... :peace

Based on your theory I could conclude the Obama should have been impeached since he didn't have Hillary thrown in the slammer, since she admitted to her illegal email server. Talk about a smoking server, it wasn't just alleged, it was admitted to.
 
I just posted a "he did it first pic" so I won't repeat myself. So what is your point? They investigated her lying cheat of a husband too.

He lied to a federal judge. She lied to........well she just lies.
 
That is clearly not accurate as there is countless records of Trump denying that possibility. He has yet to definitely admit it with no uncertain terms. For f's sake his AG has not even been breifed on the possibility.

You are certainly living in a protected area with your head in the sand.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
So you contradict yourself. You want Trump to admit to something his AG hasn't been briefed on.
 
So you contradict yourself. You want Trump to admit to something his AG hasn't been briefed on.
Now you are just being silly. His AG has not yet been briefed yet for two reasons. He has recused himself and secondly, this administration has not taken Russian efforts to undermine our election institutions seriously.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
And, show where she was asked to specifically do that. Do you understand that when going through an audit, you specifically give then information that is asked to be provided??? That would be the process I would follow in that situation.

You're right RAMOSS, how silly of me to assume these hearings didn't request of Clinton and her State Dept. all relevant documents concerning Benghazi. :roll:
 
Oh, lord. Another topic turned into "but...but HILLARY!!!"

:doh
 
Oh, lord. Another topic turned into "but...but HILLARY!!!"

:doh

Remember the ones "but Bush" ones? Double standard alive and well.
 
Now you are just being silly. His AG has not yet been briefed yet for two reasons. He has recused himself and secondly, this administration has not taken Russian efforts to undermine our election institutions seriously.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

BTW, where's the proof of collusion? How's the coming?
 
BTW, where's the proof of collusion? How's the coming?
Two things.

1. Collusion is not the only thing being investigated.

2. You will have to ask the Senate, House, and independent investigations as well as all the agencies that have expended resources as far as how it is going.

I see obfuscation is still the preferred method to discredit the investigations by Trust in Trump'ies.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
Two things.

1. Collusion is not the only thing being investigated.

2. You will have to ask the Senate, House, and independent investigations as well as all the agencies that have expended resources as far as how it is going.

I see obfuscation is still the preferred method to discredit the investigations by Trust in Trump'ies.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Russians weren't the big bad guys last year when Obama said merely "Cut it out guys", the pansy little ****. Now it's like we're fighting the Nazis. You guys decided on your own to make this more than it is. No investigation into how Hillary ****ed that socialist prick Bernie Sanders over during the election. Not a word from you then.
 
Russians weren't the big bad guys last year when Obama said merely "Cut it out guys", the pansy little ****. Now it's like we're fighting the Nazis. You guys decided on your own to make this more than it is. No investigation into how Hillary ****ed that socialist prick Bernie Sanders over during the election. Not a word from you then.
That is a lie. I am the first to condem the DNC and Wasserman. I have pointed out how Hillary and the Democrats should be ashamed at continuing to welcome Wasserman Shultz in the party. It is a disgrace.

It is also a disgrace that Trump values loyalty over honesty and integrity in his continued support for Flynn. Trump and Hillary are both dirty dogs. There is no question about it.

On Russia Obama did do something, 100's of times more times of something than Trump has done to the Russians. Just because Obama's response may have not gone far enough it certainly does not forgive Trump for being weak with Russia.

His continued support for Putin clearly shows that Putin gets to cuck Trump not the other way around.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
You've mixed two train's of responses. Start with post #33 to understand my links to your post.

It was either a foolish response, or a deliberate attempt to divert the discussion. The statement was made that the DNC refused to turn over their servers to the FBI for examination of the alleged hacking. The DNC refused to comply, instead contracting a firm based out of the Ukraine. ALL the fed intel and reports since have been based not an examination of the actual server but of data provided to them by the DNC. The statement was challenged and the challenge was met. So...next step...divert to Benghazi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom