• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

President Trump Questions 25 States Refusing to Hand Over Voter Information

Top Cat

Top Cat

He's the most tip top
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 4, 2011
Messages
33,010
Reaction score
14,658
Location
Near Seattle
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
[FONT=&quot][h=1]What Are They Trying to Hide?' President Trump Questions 25 States Refusing to Hand Over Voter Information[/h]
[FONT=&quot]Trump tweeted about the subject Saturday morning writing, "Numerous states are refusing to give information to the very distinguished VOTER FRAUD PANEL. What are they trying to hide?"
Click to expand...


Donald Trump Questions States Refusing to Release Voter Data | Time.com

Oh the delicious irony. :lamo[/FONT]





[/FONT]
 
The other thread goes into detail on what kind of private voter information each state is legally allowed to provide and/or make public. Also covered in that thread is the inherent distrust of the man making that request whose motives are in extreme doubt because of his unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud.

So we'll just ask a few other questions on point regarding this tweet:

1)Why are we obligated to give the President so much of our private information when he's kept a death grip on his tax returns all these years?
2)If the President asked you personally for your name, address, date of birth, partial social security number, political party and criminal record, and relied on him to keep that information safe and not to abuse it in any way, would you give it to him?
3)Bonus hypothetical question: if President Obama had asked you personally for your name, address, date of birth, partial social security number, political party and criminal record, and relied on him to keep that information safe and not to abuse it in any way, would you give it to him?
4)Alternate Reality Super Funtime Bonus Question: If Hillary Clinton had won the electoral vote but lost the popular vote, and felt super insecure about her victory, even going so far as to openly doubt the electoral outcome in states that voted against her, and obsessed over the election in the eight months since then, would you provide her with your name, address, date of birth, partial social security number, political party and criminal record, and rely on her to keep that information safe and not to abuse it in any way?

Do I need to beat this horse any longer or have I made my point?
 
Last edited:
Cardinal said:
The other thread goes into detail on what kind of private voter information each state is legally allowed to provide and/or make public. Also covered in that thread is the inherent distrust of the man making that request whose motives are in extreme doubt based on his unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud.

So we'll just ask a couple other questions on point regarding this tweet:

1)Why are we obligated to give the President so much of our private information when he's kept a death grip on his tax returns for all these years?
2)If the President asked you personally for your name, address, date of birth, partial social security number, political party and criminal record, and relied on him to keep that information safe and not to abuse it in any way, would you give it to him?
Click to expand...

Exactly the point.
 
Hide? They just dont want their personal information to be public as this so called commission will publish it all.
 
PeteEU said:
Hide? They just dont want their personal information to be public as this so called commission will publish it all.
Click to expand...

Evidence? Source?
 
countryboy said:
That word, "irony", it doesn't mean what you think it means. ;)
Click to expand...

Nice to see Trump admit that refusing to hand over critical information is indicative of someone hiding something.

Yes, the irony is delicious. Your blind loyalty nothwithstanding.
 
Cardinal said:
The other thread goes into detail on what kind of private voter information each state is legally allowed to provide and/or make public. Also covered in that thread is the inherent distrust of the man making that request whose motives are in extreme doubt because of his unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud.
Click to expand...

Maybe that's a good reason to prove there is not voter fraud or if there is, how bad is it? Is that not the objective of the panel looking into this voter fraud issue?
 
Born Free said:
Maybe that's a good reason to prove there is not voter fraud or if there is, how bad is it? Is that not the objective of the panel looking into this voter fraud issue?
Click to expand...

Ah yes, the people worried about the federal government is out to get all of your secrets, is now supporting an investigation being led by the federal government into getting your information.

I'll ask the same question I asked before and nobody has answered. President Trump said that 5,000,000 people voted illegally. Where was his evidence?

Why isn't the probe asking him for it?


:roll:
 
Donald Trump said:
What Are They Trying to Hide?
Click to expand...

Where are your tax returns you hypocrite? What are you hiding?
 
President Trump, follow legal protocol in getting state records.

But don't think for a moment that most of the states are going to let you go on a fishing expedition.
 
There are two alternatives:

Either there was massive voter fraud, or

the American electorate was foolish enough to have elected a reality TV star who doesn't seem to understand the need for the Fifth Amendment to the highest office in the land.

Of the two, I hope we do find that there was massive fraud, but I'm afraid the answer is #2
 
Top Cat said:
Nice to see Trump admit that refusing to hand over critical information is indicative of someone hiding something.

Yes, the irony is delicious. Your blind loyalty nothwithstanding.
Click to expand...
I have nothing to hide but i dont want the gov spying on me. Go get a warrant if you think you got probable cause.

I dont want the gov checking me out to own a gun or looking at my medical records. Nor so i want tsa patting me down at the airport or nsa looking at my communications.

All this crap needs to stop. The gov and most of you are too damn nosey for my tastes.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Born Free said:
Maybe that's a good reason to prove there is not voter fraud or if there is, how bad is it? Is that not the objective of the panel looking into this voter fraud issue?
Click to expand...

What you responded to was the part of my post quite specifically covered at length in the other thread. The part you edited out is the meat of my post meant for this thread.
 
Last edited:
pot ................ meet kettle .................... BITCH ................... :lol:
 
trouble13 said:
I have nothing to hide but i dont want the gov spying on me. Go get a warrant if you think you got probable cause.

I dont want the gov checking me out to own a gun or looking at my medical records. Nor so i want tsa patting me down at the airport or nsa looking at my communications.

All this crap needs to stop. The gov and most of you are too damn nosey for my tastes.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I think you missed my point. But ok.
 
"Wouldn't it be great if we could get along with Russia?"


- Donald The Pig Trump pre-election
 
Hatuey said:
Ah yes, the people worried about the federal government is out to get all of your secrets, is now supporting an investigation being led by the federal government into getting your information.

I'll ask the same question I asked before and nobody has answered. President Trump said that 5,000,000 people voted illegally. Where was his evidence?

Why isn't the probe asking him for it?


:roll:
Click to expand...

If you are trying to get into Trump's head, that will require an anal probe.
 
Hatuey said:
Ah yes, the people worried about the federal government is out to get all of your secrets, is now supporting an investigation being led by the federal government into getting your information.

I'll ask the same question I asked before and nobody has answered. President Trump said that 5,000,000 people voted illegally. Where was his evidence?

Why isn't the probe asking him for it?


:roll:
Click to expand...



well, I'm sure Trump realizes (maybe not :lol:) something called the electoral college so, he did not need the extra 5 million votes :2wave:

but on the other hand maybe he needs that probe :lamo
 
Hatuey said:
Ah yes, the people worried about the federal government is out to get all of your secrets, is now supporting an investigation being led by the federal government into getting your information.

I'll ask the same question I asked before and nobody has answered. President Trump said that 5,000,000 people voted illegally. Where was his evidence?

Why isn't the probe asking him for it?


:roll:
Click to expand...

That's the problem - I don't believe there is any. He just can't stand that he lost the popular vote. The crowd at his inauguration was not the biggest ever. The ego trip is horrifying. This is not a guy who is interested in being president - king or dictator...yes - president of all American Citizens. No.
 
Dittohead not! said:
There are two alternatives:

Either there was massive voter fraud, or

the American electorate was foolish enough to have elected a reality TV star who doesn't seem to understand the need for the Fifth Amendment to the highest office in the land.

Of the two, I hope we do find that there was massive fraud, but I'm afraid the answer is #2
Click to expand...

#2 for sure
 
Born Free said:
Maybe that's a good reason to prove there is not voter fraud or if there is, how bad is it? Is that not the objective of the panel looking into this voter fraud issue?
Click to expand...

I would think that is the job of state election commissions to review whether or not voter fraud took place because it is the states who are holding the elections, not the federal government so I am not sure why it is not just respecting the states electoral boards to decide whether or not there is a reason to review/look for massive voter fraud (which I doubt took place in the first place)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom