• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Public Accounts by Friends Show James Comey Leaked While FBI Director

holbritter

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
21,506
Reaction score
10,424
Location
NY
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Public Accounts by Friends Show James Comey Leaked While FBI Director - Breitbart

James Comey may have misled senators on May 3, when he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had never been an anonymous source in news reports related to the Russia investigation.
By that time, he had already leaked several private conversations he had with President Trump to his friend Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of the blog Lawfare and former editorial writer for the Washington Post.

Wittes wrote in a piece on May 18, only nine days after Comey was fired, that the former FBI director had shared those conversations “over the previous few months.” He wrote:

Comey never told me the details of the dinner meeting; I don’t think I even knew that there had been a meeting over dinner until I learned it from the Times story. But he did tell me in general terms that early on, Trump had ‘asked for loyalty’ and that Comey had promised him only honesty. He also told me that Trump was perceptibly uncomfortable with this answer.

Wittes also wrote that he had lunch with Comey on March 27, and that they discussed a phone call that Trump had made to him earlier in the day.

Wittes denied those conversations were leaks but were “just conversations between friends, the contents of which one friend is now disclosing.”


But wait, there's more

Wittes not only wrote about the “loyalty” conversation with Trump in his May 18 blog post, titled: “What James Comey Told Me About Donald Trump,” he but he also wrote about contacting the New York Times as a source to share what Comey had told him. He also discussed contacting the New York Times in a Buzzfeed interivew.

The fact that Wittes did so only after Comey was fired does not change the fact that Comey shared his communications with Trump while he was still FBI director.

Comey’s leaking while still FBI director appears to have extended beyond Wittes.

Comey told senators on June 8 that he decided on May 12 to release his memos of his conversations with Trump to friend Daniel Richman so that he could leak them to the media to prompt a special counsel.

But that doesn’t explain who leaked to the New York Times the conversation about the “loyalty request” on May 11 — a day before Comey said he gave Richman memos of the conversation to leak to media outlets.

That Times story cited “associates,” or “two people who have heard” Comey’s account of the dinner and agreed to keep it quiet while Comey was director.


I had a feeling these leaks were from someone close to it.
 
"Leaking" private conversations or personal memos isn't a crime so legally standing I fail to see what the issue is here.
 
Public Accounts by Friends Show James Comey Leaked While FBI Director - Breitbart

James Comey may have misled senators on May 3, when he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had never been an anonymous source in news reports related to the Russia investigation.
By that time, he had already leaked several private conversations he had with President Trump to his friend Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of the blog Lawfare and former editorial writer for the Washington Post.

Wittes wrote in a piece on May 18, only nine days after Comey was fired, that the former FBI director had shared those conversations “over the previous few months.” He wrote:

Comey never told me the details of the dinner meeting; I don’t think I even knew that there had been a meeting over dinner until I learned it from the Times story. But he did tell me in general terms that early on, Trump had ‘asked for loyalty’ and that Comey had promised him only honesty. He also told me that Trump was perceptibly uncomfortable with this answer.

Wittes also wrote that he had lunch with Comey on March 27, and that they discussed a phone call that Trump had made to him earlier in the day.

Wittes denied those conversations were leaks but were “just conversations between friends, the contents of which one friend is now disclosing.”


But wait, there's more

Wittes not only wrote about the “loyalty” conversation with Trump in his May 18 blog post, titled: “What James Comey Told Me About Donald Trump,” he but he also wrote about contacting the New York Times as a source to share what Comey had told him. He also discussed contacting the New York Times in a Buzzfeed interivew.

The fact that Wittes did so only after Comey was fired does not change the fact that Comey shared his communications with Trump while he was still FBI director.

Comey’s leaking while still FBI director appears to have extended beyond Wittes.

Comey told senators on June 8 that he decided on May 12 to release his memos of his conversations with Trump to friend Daniel Richman so that he could leak them to the media to prompt a special counsel.

But that doesn’t explain who leaked to the New York Times the conversation about the “loyalty request” on May 11 — a day before Comey said he gave Richman memos of the conversation to leak to media outlets.

That Times story cited “associates,” or “two people who have heard” Comey’s account of the dinner and agreed to keep it quiet while Comey was director.


I had a feeling these leaks were from someone close to it.

So Breitbart is reporting Comey shared unclassified information with friends and those non-classified conversations were reported to, then by, the press. I'm missing the big problem here. Is there a law that if you have a conservation with POTUS about ANYTHING, you can't tell anyone about it, ever, unless POTUS gives you explicit permission? I'd like to see that law. If not, then someone will have to explain why what Comey did was wrong or illegal or even unethical in some way.
 
So Breitbart is reporting Comey shared unclassified information with friends and those non-classified conversations were reported to, then by, the press. I'm missing the big problem here. Is there a law that if you have a conservation with POTUS about ANYTHING, you can't tell anyone about it, ever, unless POTUS gives you explicit permission? I'd like to see that law. If not, then someone will have to explain why what Comey did was wrong or illegal or even unethical in some way.


You don't see anything wrong with the head of the FBI gossiping with his friends about what the President says to him in private?? Especially when said friend is in the "news" business? And may have lied about it when he testified?

Uhm. Ok. I guess we won't agree on this one.
 
You don't see anything wrong with the head of the FBI gossiping with his friends about what the President says to him in private?? Especially when said friend is in the "news" business? And may have lied about it when he testified?

Uhm. Ok. I guess we won't agree on this one.

Again, what is the standard you're proposing here ? If you have a conversation with POTUS, on any topic, you must not ever share it with anyone? You'll have to be really careful about that, because friends and allies of POTUS outside government share details of their conversations all the time and I've never seen you object. You can't accept that as OK, but then object ONLY when the conversation makes Trump look bad in some way.

You're also calling it "gossip" but another alternative is he's sharing a troubling conversation with trusted friends and seeking their advice. And when Comey was still working for POTUS as FBI director, those friends recognized that the conversations making Trump look bad were inappropriate to share with the press. After he was fired, that obligation went away.
 
"Leaking" private conversations or personal memos isn't a crime so legally standing I fail to see what the issue is here.

Come on, they need something to hold on to ... :lol:
 
Again, what is the standard you're proposing here ? If you have a conversation with POTUS, on any topic, you must not ever share it with anyone? You'll have to be really careful about that, because friends and allies of POTUS outside government share details of their conversations all the time and I've never seen you object. You can't accept that as OK, but then object ONLY when the conversation makes Trump look bad in some way.

You're also calling it "gossip" but another alternative is he's sharing a troubling conversation with trusted friends and seeking their advice. And when Comey was still working for POTUS as FBI director, those friends recognized that the conversations making Trump look bad were inappropriate to share with the press. After he was fired, that obligation went away.


No, I don't only object when the conversation makes Trump look bad. And no, not on ANY topic, but if Comey was so concerned about his "shouldn't be private" meetings that he wrote a memo, then yes, that information should not be casually shared. I don't know the nuances of the law enough to say it was classified or not, but IMO, if it was important enough to write in a memo, it might be important enough to be considered classified.
 
No, I don't only object when the conversation makes Trump look bad. And no, not on ANY topic, but if Comey was so concerned about his "shouldn't be private" meetings that he wrote a memo, then yes, that information should not be casually shared. I don't know the nuances of the law enough to say it was classified or not, but IMO, if it was important enough to write in a memo, it might be important enough to be considered classified.

I think the standard for what's considered "classified" is at least a little higher than that.

The term "leaking" has lost all meaning. Now it seems to have devolved to "anything you tell the press."
 
Public Accounts by Friends Show James Comey Leaked While FBI Director - Breitbart

James Comey may have misled senators on May 3, when he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had never been an anonymous source in news reports related to the Russia investigation.
By that time, he had already leaked several private conversations he had with President Trump to his friend Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of the blog Lawfare and former editorial writer for the Washington Post.

Wittes wrote in a piece on May 18, only nine days after Comey was fired, that the former FBI director had shared those conversations “over the previous few months.” He wrote:

Comey never told me the details of the dinner meeting; I don’t think I even knew that there had been a meeting over dinner until I learned it from the Times story. But he did tell me in general terms that early on, Trump had ‘asked for loyalty’ and that Comey had promised him only honesty. He also told me that Trump was perceptibly uncomfortable with this answer.

Wittes also wrote that he had lunch with Comey on March 27, and that they discussed a phone call that Trump had made to him earlier in the day.

Wittes denied those conversations were leaks but were “just conversations between friends, the contents of which one friend is now disclosing.”


But wait, there's more

Wittes not only wrote about the “loyalty” conversation with Trump in his May 18 blog post, titled: “What James Comey Told Me About Donald Trump,” he but he also wrote about contacting the New York Times as a source to share what Comey had told him. He also discussed contacting the New York Times in a Buzzfeed interivew.

The fact that Wittes did so only after Comey was fired does not change the fact that Comey shared his communications with Trump while he was still FBI director.

Comey’s leaking while still FBI director appears to have extended beyond Wittes.

Comey told senators on June 8 that he decided on May 12 to release his memos of his conversations with Trump to friend Daniel Richman so that he could leak them to the media to prompt a special counsel.

But that doesn’t explain who leaked to the New York Times the conversation about the “loyalty request” on May 11 — a day before Comey said he gave Richman memos of the conversation to leak to media outlets.

That Times story cited “associates,” or “two people who have heard” Comey’s account of the dinner and agreed to keep it quiet while Comey was director.


I had a feeling these leaks were from someone close to it.

Comey is a POS and an example of why the swamp needs draining.
 
"Leaking" private conversations or personal memos isn't a crime so legally standing I fail to see what the issue is here.

If its not a crime it definitely offers some insight into Comey's motives, which given the way he conducted himself under the Obama administration seemed highly political
 
"Leaking" private conversations or personal memos isn't a crime so legally standing I fail to see what the issue is here.

"Misleading Congress" is a crime. See the issue, now?
 
I think the standard for what's considered "classified" is at least a little higher than that.

The term "leaking" has lost all meaning. Now it seems to have devolved to "anything you tell the press."

Information doesn't have to be classified for a leak to be illegal.
 
You don't see anything wrong with the head of the FBI gossiping with his friends about what the President says to him in private?? Especially when said friend is in the "news" business? And may have lied about it when he testified?

Uhm. Ok. I guess we won't agree on this one.

If Trump privately told me he was a Jets fan I wouldn't feel obligated to keep it a secret. Sorry.
 
If Trump privately told me he was a Jets fan I wouldn't feel obligated to keep it a secret. Sorry.

You know that's not what I meant. Please don't take my comments out of context.
 
Information doesn't have to be classified for a leak to be illegal.

Correct, but not all "leaks" are illegal. So on what basis are you claiming what Comey did might have been or was a crime? On another thread, some golfers "leaked" a video of Trump driving his golf cart all over the green. Horrific behavior on Trump's part. Are those guys in legal trouble? Need a lawyer?
 
Public Accounts by Friends Show James Comey Leaked While FBI Director - Breitbart

James Comey may have misled senators on May 3, when he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had never been an anonymous source in news reports related to the Russia investigation.
By that time, he had already leaked several private conversations he had with President Trump to his friend Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of the blog Lawfare and former editorial writer for the Washington Post.

Wittes wrote in a piece on May 18, only nine days after Comey was fired, that the former FBI director had shared those conversations “over the previous few months.” He wrote:

Comey never told me the details of the dinner meeting; I don’t think I even knew that there had been a meeting over dinner until I learned it from the Times story. But he did tell me in general terms that early on, Trump had ‘asked for loyalty’ and that Comey had promised him only honesty. He also told me that Trump was perceptibly uncomfortable with this answer.

Wittes also wrote that he had lunch with Comey on March 27, and that they discussed a phone call that Trump had made to him earlier in the day.

Wittes denied those conversations were leaks but were “just conversations between friends, the contents of which one friend is now disclosing.”


But wait, there's more

Wittes not only wrote about the “loyalty” conversation with Trump in his May 18 blog post, titled: “What James Comey Told Me About Donald Trump,” he but he also wrote about contacting the New York Times as a source to share what Comey had told him. He also discussed contacting the New York Times in a Buzzfeed interivew.

The fact that Wittes did so only after Comey was fired does not change the fact that Comey shared his communications with Trump while he was still FBI director.

Comey’s leaking while still FBI director appears to have extended beyond Wittes.

Comey told senators on June 8 that he decided on May 12 to release his memos of his conversations with Trump to friend Daniel Richman so that he could leak them to the media to prompt a special counsel.

But that doesn’t explain who leaked to the New York Times the conversation about the “loyalty request” on May 11 — a day before Comey said he gave Richman memos of the conversation to leak to media outlets.

That Times story cited “associates,” or “two people who have heard” Comey’s account of the dinner and agreed to keep it quiet while Comey was director.


I had a feeling these leaks were from someone close to it.


"Breithbart"

nuff said
 
No, I don't only object when the conversation makes Trump look bad. And no, not on ANY topic, but if Comey was so concerned about his "shouldn't be private" meetings that he wrote a memo, then yes, that information should not be casually shared. I don't know the nuances of the law enough to say it was classified or not, but IMO, if it was important enough to write in a memo, it might be important enough to be considered classified.

I don't accept that he "casually shared" the information - parts of his conversation that might have troubled him - like at a dinner party with friends going around the table telling funny stories. What I've read is he shared the contents of the meeting with trusted friends, who he turned to for advice, or maybe just to talk, or other FBI agents.

As to the law, whether that was legal, all I can do is trust the articles I've read about it. Lawfareblog is the best source I've found, and their analysis is here. The article links to two other analyses written by highly qualified lawyers, and they agree.
 
Is anyone really suprised he was both lying and leaking?

Thats what swamp creatures do.
 
I think the standard for what's considered "classified" is at least a little higher than that.

The term "leaking" has lost all meaning. Now it seems to have devolved to "anything you tell the press."

Yeah I have to give it to you on that one, any leak will do when the public is clamoring for it.

For a while there, Buzzfeed was getting information from anyone they could put their claws into.

Even if it was just the janitor.
 
"Leaking" private conversations or personal memos isn't a crime so legally standing I fail to see what the issue is here.

If the conversations are with the POTUS by a salaried government employee, that is the dissemination of state secrets.

This is an obvious breech of security and the oath that he took when he accepted employment.

All he needs to be branded a traitor in the media is to declare that he's a Republican.
 
So Breitbart is reporting Comey shared unclassified information with friends and those non-classified conversations were reported to, then by, the press. I'm missing the big problem here. Is there a law that if you have a conservation with POTUS about ANYTHING, you can't tell anyone about it, ever, unless POTUS gives you explicit permission? I'd like to see that law. If not, then someone will have to explain why what Comey did was wrong or illegal or even unethical in some way.

ANY private conversation with the POTUS is a state secret unless the permission to reveal it is granted by prior and specific consent by the POTUS.
 
I don't accept that he "casually shared" the information - parts of his conversation that might have troubled him - like at a dinner party with friends going around the table telling funny stories. What I've read is he shared the contents of the meeting with trusted friends, who he turned to for advice, or maybe just to talk, or other FBI agents.

As to the law, whether that was legal, all I can do is trust the articles I've read about it. Lawfareblog is the best source I've found, and their analysis is here. The article links to two other analyses written by highly qualified lawyers, and they agree.

His "friend" Wittes is the editor-in-chief at Lawfareblog. Not that it has no value, but just pointing that out.

They do say that they are less unsure about the memo being classified: We’re less convinced by this part of the argument. It is clearly right that recorded recollections of conversations with a president are not necessarily government property. But if Comey wrote these memos about official meetings, on official computers, on official time, that probably makes it hard to argue they aren’t government records. That said, Comey could certainly reproduce the content in his personal capacity without the documents qualifying as government records.

Thinking about it, you are right about the "casually shared" aspect. IMO, the whole thing makes Comey suspect of previous leaks. I guess we will see if anything more comes of it.
 
If the conversations are with the POTUS by a salaried government employee, that is the dissemination of state secrets.

Demonstrably false. Nothing Comey shared regarding his conversations with the President were classified or contained any thing disseminated from classified information.

This is an obvious breech of security and the oath that he took when he accepted employment.

Again, flat out false. There is nothing within the oath Comey took that said he is unable to share what he shared with the public. You could argue it is wildly unprofessional, but not illegal or in breach of anything he swore to uphold.

All he needs to be branded a traitor in the media is to declare that he's a Republican.

Oh hop off your cross already you poor, victimized soul.
 
Back
Top Bottom