• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller

Yes. You may see that I have said Trump is not doing so great of a job of "Draining the swamp".

Of course he isn't. Kind of hard to do when you engage in the tactics of the swamp-dwellers.
 
Edit: I'm adding Paul Ryan's commentary on the Comey hearing, as example of what may occur:




I really wish Ryan would have just said....."The thing about Trump is....well....he's an idiot"
Much more concise.
 
I don't know; I saw it on Yahoo so, maybe they thought it was news ...........

It would be news if Trump fired Mueller. He hasnt and Yahoo isnt a member here, you are

Your'e responsible for posting that nonsense, not them
 
It would be news if Trump fired Mueller. He hasnt and Yahoo isnt a member here, you are

Your'e responsible for posting that nonsense, not them


one person's news is another man's toilet tissue; sorry it feels so rough for you

many DP members post articles here butt that doesn't mean folks need to break down & cry about it ...............

of course, you could go whine to the mod staff too
 
Last edited:
one person's news is another man's toilet tissue; sorry it feels so rough for you

many DP members post articles here butt that doesn't mean folks need to break down & cry about it ...............

of course, you could go whine to the mod staff too

How many threads have you started on this so far ?
2 ? 3 ? 5 ?

I would think your outrage over this non-story could be expresed in one post, and a thread is over doing it a bit, but 2 threads ? 3 threads ?
 
It would be news if Trump fired Mueller. He hasnt and Yahoo isnt a member here, you are

Your'e responsible for posting that nonsense, not them

You just don't want to hear of the possibility. Be honest.
 
How many threads have you started on this so far ?
2 ? 3 ? 5 ?

I would think your outrage over this non-story could be expresed in one post, and a thread is over doing it a bit, but 2 threads ? 3 threads ?

Then ignore them and move on.
 
Then ignore them and move on.

Nah, I would rather call attention to the attention seeking and to the level of desperation needed to start multiple threads on a topic about nothing
 
So you don't think Trump potentially making the same blunder a Nixon is news? Really?

No, I dont think the Lefts wishful thinking counts as news

Lol.....hows that collusion conviction coming along ?
 
So everybody that challenges your orange sphincter man is part of the swamp? Oh brother.

You have a thing for sphincters. No, not everyone who challenges Trump is part of the swamp. But a career politician who has been part of every administration including the ramping up of warrantless wiretapping, false statements about the war in Iraq, and validating torture is certainly part of the swamp.
 
No, I dont think the Lefts wishful thinking counts as news

Lol.....hows that collusion conviction coming along ?

And all the threads some pieces of **** righties started on Clinton, how did that conviction go? Funny you weren't whining about those, wonder why?
 
And all the threads some pieces of **** righties started on Clinton, how did that conviction go? Funny you weren't whining about those, wonder why?

Clinton violated the law and was let off the hook by Comey but not by the American people

She's not the President, Trump is and you would do well to accept that, or just continue on with your pererpetual temper tantrum, I dont care
 
Clinton violated the law and was let off the hook by Comey but not by the American people

She's not the President, Trump is and you would do well to accept that, or just continue on with your pererpetual temper tantrum, I dont care

Yeah she isn't president but that didn't stop you righties from posting numerous threads and no she didn't break the law so you would be well to remember that or continue posting idiotic comments. And yeah you DO care because you're whining about it so much.
 
The only news here is that Trump actually has friends.
 
Yeah she isn't president but that didn't stop you righties from posting numerous threads and no she didn't break the law so you would be well to remember that or continue posting idiotic comments. And yeah you DO care because you're whining about it so much.

Yes, yes she did break the law and yes we were hard on her and Obama. They were exceedingly corrupt and deserved it

FBI: Yes, Queen Hillary Broke The Law. No, She Won't Be Prosecuted. | Daily Wire

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.


18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.


18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control.

But there was so much corruption under Obama, I understand its easy to get mixed up....

Like when Susan Rice said the unmaskings were legal....she lied...again

Here's FISA's own opinion on the widespread illegal unmasking that happened under the Obama administration that started in 2010 and went on to 2016.
https://www.scribd.com/document/349261099/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017-4#from_embed

But why am I posting that link, you people never read it. You see, thats ACTUAL evidence of multiple crimes committed under the Obama administration, its not some tin hattery russian collusion lunacy or obstruction charges that are only backed by the cumalitive butthurt of the entire Democrat party and their supporters and nothing else
 
Clinton violated the law and was let off the hook by Comey but not by the American people

She's not the President, Trump is and you would do well to accept that, or just continue on with your pererpetual temper tantrum, I dont care

I have a suspicion that you won't accept when he isn't anymore.
 
Yes, yes she did break the law and yes we were hard on her and Obama. They were exceedingly corrupt and deserved it

FBI: Yes, Queen Hillary Broke The Law. No, She Won't Be Prosecuted. | Daily Wire

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.


18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.


18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control.

But there was so much corruption under Obama, I understand its easy to get mixed up....

Like when Susan Rice said the unmaskings were legal....she lied...again

Here's FISA's own opinion on the widespread illegal unmasking that happened under the Obama administration that started in 2010 and went on to 2016.
https://www.scribd.com/document/349261099/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017-4#from_embed

But why am I posting that link, you people never read it. You see, thats ACTUAL evidence of multiple crimes committed under the Obama administration, its not some tin hattery russian collusion lunacy or obstruction charges that are only backed by the cumalitive butthurt of the entire Democrat party and their supporters and nothing else

Again your armchair lawyering doesn't change the FACT that even under Trump she didn't break the law because no charges were ever filed. Again she didn't break The law no matter how hard you want it to be.

Trump is more corrupt than Hillary or obama combined but you are ok with that. You are ok with republicans being secretive on their bills, you are ok with trump lying, you are ok with trump having a media blackout on press conferences and you are ok with a president with strong Russian ties in his whole administration. In other words you excuse the most corrupt president like trump so you have zero credibility.
 
Put nothing past Stump. If the temperature rises to a level of discomfort the little weasel will fire him and never explain truthfully the reason.
 
December 1, 2017 ................................. not so much, yet ....................
 
Back
Top Bottom