- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Why do I get the feeling that if was talking about restricting access to firearms by imposing a 100000% tax on them you wouldn't be using the same logic of 'it's not a restriction, they're readily available, people still have access!!!'
Infantile analogy. No one - no one - argues that access to guns is restricted because someone else doesn't buy them for you.
No one argues it because it would be stupid to do so. And ironically enough considering this post, that's something YOU would have no trouble seeing.