• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Portland mayor calls for cancellation of free-speech rally

Portland mayor calls for cancellation of free-speech rally – The Denver Post

Even though the killer has been shown to be a Bernie supporter (he hated Trump and Hillary) the Portland mayor wants to shut down Free Speech Rally. Seems anything that isn't in line with his thinking should be silenced.

Do you think it should be cancelled?

Of course not. Calling for such is definitely anti-American and the mayor should be ran out of office.

:lamo. A White Lives Matter Rally

Interesting, one would think that Free Speech applies to everyone regardless of race. Since when did Free Speech apply only to whites? Not to mention there is no white lives matter movement so not sure where the hell you got that from.

How about instead of playing a race card you actually comment on the topic? Which is about the Portland mayor calling for a shut down on a free speech rally.
 
Portland mayor calls for cancellation of free-speech rally – The Denver Post

Even though the killer has been shown to be a Bernie supporter (he hated Trump and Hillary) the Portland mayor wants to shut down Free Speech Rally. Seems anything that isn't in line with his thinking should be silenced.

Do you think it should be cancelled?

If you are a Democrat and the ACLU slaps you down, you know you screwed up.

1. The government cannot revoke or deny a permit based on the viewpoint of the demonstrators. Period. https://t.co/P9gcNPAumH

— ACLU of Oregon (@ACLU_OR) May 29, 2017

Here is an article that give some more info, such as statements from the organizer of the event. Portland Mayor Moves to Suspend First Amendment for Trump Supporters in Wake of Killings

Be aware that this article has a right wing slant, though in my opinion it is not excessive.
 
Portland mayor calls for cancellation of free-speech rally – The Denver Post

Even though the killer has been shown to be a Bernie supporter (he hated Trump and Hillary) the Portland mayor wants to shut down Free Speech Rally. Seems anything that isn't in line with his thinking should be silenced.

Do you think it should be cancelled?
You should use a Portland news source like this one:

Mayor Ted Wheeler Asks Feds to Help Him Block Alt-Right "Free Speech" Rallies from Portland in Wake of Hate Slaying - Willamette Week

Willamette Week is a left geared paper, but they are generally accurate and fair in their reporting.
 
Of course not. Calling for such is definitely anti-American and the mayor should be ran out of office.



Interesting, one would think that Free Speech applies to everyone regardless of race. Since when did Free Speech apply only to whites? Not to mention there is no white lives matter movement so not sure where the hell you got that from.

How about instead of playing a race card you actually comment on the topic? Which is about the Portland mayor calling for a shut down on a free speech rally.


Irony Alert ...
 
Irony Alert ...

I see that you are incapable of making any valid point what so ever. For someone that professes to be a free thinker you sure aren't putting much thought into your posts that's for sure.
 
during his campaign Trump stated that he would wipe out crime YET Trump himself has incited hatred from the right that continues to blossom

Trump has brought the genie out of the bottle; this hate speech bull**** is all on Don Cheeto

let's watch & see how wittle Donnie gets the genie that is dividing Trump's America back in the bottle
 
I see that you are incapable of making any valid point what so ever. For someone that professes to be a free thinker you sure aren't putting much thought into your posts that's for sure.

He never has.
 
during his campaign Trump stated that he would wipe out crime YET Trump himself has incited hatred from the right that continues to blossom

Trump has brought the genie out of the bottle; this hate speech bull**** is all on Don Cheeto

let's watch & see how wittle Donnie gets the genie that is dividing Trump's America back in the bottle

What hate speech? How is this rally hate speech?
 
I see that you are incapable of making any valid point what so ever. For someone that professes to be a free thinker you sure aren't putting much thought into your posts that's for sure.

that is pretty much his MO on every topic.
 
What hate speech? How is this rally hate speech?

anything that doesn't agree with the liberal agenda is hate speech now it seems.
this is how you erode the freedom of the constitution. which is why hate speech laws should be
ruled unconstitutional.

We already have laws regarding this we don't need special laws.
Under these special laws anything that someone doesn't like could be labeled as hate speech.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-the-first-amendment/?utm_term=.e249797ee6f4
 
Portland mayor calls for cancellation of free-speech rally – The Denver Post

Even though the killer has been shown to be a Bernie supporter (he hated Trump and Hillary) the Portland mayor wants to shut down Free Speech Rally. Seems anything that isn't in line with his thinking should be silenced.

Do you think it should be cancelled?

There was a time when it came to speech that this country's motto was or the old adage went: "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it."
 
You should use a Portland news source like this one:

Mayor Ted Wheeler Asks Feds to Help Him Block Alt-Right "Free Speech" Rallies from Portland in Wake of Hate Slaying - Willamette Week

Willamette Week is a left geared paper, but they are generally accurate and fair in their reporting.

The problem with news sources today, the media in general and I use the term general, is the reporting is slanted toward one side or the other. There is no more just reporting the news, the facts, the event, the happening and keeping either personal or network bias out of it. Who really knows if the OP news source is correct or the one you put it? Certainly not someone living in Georgia. I know the slants of Fox, CNN, MSNBC before I watch any news on them. I know certain new magazines are slanted and slanted may not be a strong enough word. I think all this taking of sides instead of just reporting news is one of the main reason only 32% of all Americans trust the media anymore. That once again is media in general.

Americans' Trust in Mass Media Sinks to New Low | Gallup

Each side wants to hear what it wants to hear, to have their views reinforced. Conservatives go to Fox, Liberals to MSNBC where each gets his view of slanted news the way and how he wants to hear it.
 
What hate speech? How is this rally hate speech?


really? are you kidding ............... "ban Muslims," "get them out," "lock her up," "Mexican rapist" .............. just for starters

I guess some folks haven't been paying attention to the fact that Don Cheeto is Hell bent on dividing America with his vitriol & his BS attitude rhetoric of hate
 
really? are you kidding ............... "ban Muslims," "get them out," "lock her up," "Mexican rapist" .............. just for starters

I guess some folks haven't been paying attention to the fact that Don Cheeto is Hell bent on dividing America with his vitriol & his BS attitude rhetoric of hate

that is not hate speech.

most of the terror attacks that have happened in the US are due to Muslim domestic terrorists.
the get them out statement was about 2 hecklers that were disrupting an event that he was at.

lock her up is true. Clinton committed and broke several high federal laws. one of which was a minimum of 10 years in prison.
she should have been put on trial and had her day in court like any other citizen.

Yep while a % of them don't do anything there is another % that does. all which could be avoided if we actually
executed our existing laws regarding illegal immigration.

again that is not hate speech it is fact. we know you haven't been paying attention to facts it is obvious.
 
I see that you are incapable of making any valid point what so ever. For someone that professes to be a free thinker you sure aren't putting much thought into your posts that's for sure.

I don't need to make any valid point, you people are all the validity I need to point out the hypocrisy. If you're a group of Black Lives Matters protectors, who are widely diverse in both gender and race, they are categorized as thugs.

So keep proving my point, no need to stop now. ;)
 
There was a time when it came to speech that this country's motto was or the old adage went: "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it."

this is how you implement though police. it started out with the PC movement. then it became the hate speech and calling everyone a bigot movement.
now it is if you disagree with what I think then it is hate speech movement.

this is how you move to a totalitarian government.
 
he can't cancel it. that would be a violation of the first amendment.


The sponsors would probably sue if he did, and to win, the city would have to show it had some compelling reason which made cancelling the event the only solution. Claiming an unmanageable threat to public safety seems to be popular these days--pretty much UC Berkeley's rationale for revoking Ann Coulter's invitation to speak there.

The millions of fake liberals who now live in this country--and they are the very opposite of liberal--dislike the First Amendment almost as much as they dislike the Second and the Tenth. These people run down the U.S., carry water for its adversaries, and do all they can to damage the Constitution, and then they shriek that they are being persecuted when anyone suggests they are un-American.
 
I don't need to make any valid point, you people are all the validity I need to point out the hypocrisy. If you're a group of Black Lives Matters protectors, who are widely diverse in both gender and race, they are categorized as thugs.

So keep proving my point, no need to stop now. ;)

when you loot destroy and disrupt public civility through violence then yes you are considered a thug whether you are black or white.
we know you don't make valid points that is why we are calling you out on it.
 
When the government, at any level, starts to label folks as extremists and uses that to deny them permission to speak that does not "calm things down".

The feds should respond by arresting the moron that thinks that it is not unconstitutional to order a "temporarily" ban of free speech by some citizens inside the US but it is (so far) unconstitutional for the POTUS to order a "temporarily" ban of some foreign nationals from entering the country.

It is a huge problem when "extreme vetting" (prior restraint?) is permitted to take the place of due process for US citizens. Issuing rally/protest permits based on the political lean (alt-right or antifa?) of the requestor is entering very dangerous territory.

How can non-citizens outside the US have more constitutional rights than citizens inside the US do?
 
I don't need to make any valid point, you people are all the validity I need to point out the hypocrisy. If you're a group of Black Lives Matters protectors, who are widely diverse in both gender and race, they are categorized as thugs.

So keep proving my point, no need to stop now. ;)

If you're not trying to make a point then you're doing nothing but trolling. Perhaps you need to start making a point.
 
The sponsors would probably sue if he did, and to win, the city would have to show it had some compelling reason which made cancelling the event the only solution. Claiming an unmanageable threat to public safety seems to be popular these days--pretty much UC Berkeley's rationale for revoking Ann Coulter's invitation to speak there.

which is unconstitutional. according to precedent the fear of something happening is not a strong enough case to cancel someone's free speech.

The millions of fake liberals who now live in this country--and they are the very opposite of liberal--dislike the First Amendment almost as much as they dislike the Second and the Tenth. These people run down the U.S., carry water for its adversaries, and do all they can to damage the Constitution, and then they shriek that they are being persecuted when anyone suggests they are un-American.

This is what happens when you throw logic and reason out for feelings.
everything is an appeal to emotion argument these days.

I blame us for letting it happen. it use to be we tell people to sit down and be quiet.
somewhere we lost control and we have ended up with this nonsense.

people are scared to speak their mind for fear of being labeled something.
that is thought police fully.
 
Back
Top Bottom