- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
We don't need to consider your analogy or pretend we're unclear on the nature of the breach. We know that Trump gave the Russians the city where our allied intelligence operations were based, that this would help to identify that ally, that it did identify the ally, that the ally was Israel, that Israel in no way intended for us to share their intelligence with a third party (let alone a hostile foreign adversary), and that Israel considered this breach significant enough to change the content and scope of the intelligence they share with us in the future. We also know that they were formerly warned all the way back in early January that there was the possibility that any intelligence they shared with us would be turned around and shared with Putin by Trump. And oh look that's exactly what happened. And finally, apropos of nothing, Trump admitted that he shared sensitive information when he claimed he never used the word "Israel" in the meeting with the Russians, thereby confirming the totality of the story.
Your grocery story club card analogy is stupid beyond belief.
You don't know that. You believe that because a leaker said that and you'll believe any negative comment about President Trump. It also amplifies what several of us are saying about the impropriety of the leaks.