• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's disclosure endangered spy placed inside ISIS by Israel, officials say

Conservative said:
thank you very much for your analysis, now reading comprehension seems to be a problem for you. The statement by another posters indicated that Fox isn't mainstream but more like Trump media. My statement was that Fox is mainstream as it reaches millions of people and if it isn't neither are CNN and MSNBC
Click to expand...

Your reply was to someone telling another poster that Fox is mainstream. You reflexively contradicted it because a liberal said it.

I agree that Fox is just as mainstream as the other networks. Perhaps you should focus your disagreement on your fellow rightists who are asserting that it is not.
 
rocket88 said:
Your reply was to someone telling another poster that Fox is mainstream. You reflexively contradicted it because a liberal said it.

I agree that Fox is just as mainstream as the other networks. Perhaps you should focus your disagreement on your fellow rightists who are asserting that it is not.
Click to expand...
So Pricas is a rightest?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Conservative said:
So Pricas is a rightest?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You are a rightist. Your fellow righties are trying to assert that Fox is not mainstream. They are the ones who disagree with you.

Praxas was telling one of them that Fox is indeed mainstream.
 
rocket88 said:
So are you saying that Trump is basically as good as Obama? I knew you guys had a secret mancrush on him, but if you're using him as your standard for a great President...
Click to expand...

Trump is better than Clinton, and my pet cat is better than Obama.
 
rocket88 said:
You are literally disputing the conservative line. I can't tell you how many threads I've seen here with cons bragging about Fox's ratings.

Which is it? Do they get better ratings than the others, or are they out of the mainstream?
Click to expand...

I don't care about ratings. The point is every news outlet except FOX is out to get Trump and at the same time destroy the country in the process.
 
coldjoint said:
I don't care about ratings. The point is every news outlet except FOX is out to get Trump and at the same time destroy the country in the process.
Click to expand...

How does that mean Fox is not mainstream.

There are millions of us who think that getting rid of Trump is the best way not to destroy the country. In fact, Bannon has stated that his goal is to destroy the government. I for one, respect the Constitution and our system of government. If you're looking for enemies of that, look no further than your Messiah's closest advisors.
 
coldjoint said:
Trump is better than Clinton, and my pet cat is better than Obama.
Click to expand...

But you're comparing Trump's failure to follow through on a promise with Obama's. So clearly you have a lot of admiration for Obama since you think it's a good comparison.

Care to try again? Trump said he could destroy ISIS in 30 days. Has Trump been President for more than 30 days? If so, what is he waiting for?
 
Conservative said:
Oh, my another leftist trying to define mainstream? Tell us exactly who is mainstream in the liberal world? Guess we all should get our information from MSNBC and CNN?? Seems that an alternate point of view isn't acceptable in the liberal world.
Click to expand...

Fox is MSM genius try reading .
 
Cardinal said:
Well, Trump bears measurable liability for sharing Israel's classified information with Russia, even if you're not holding him accountable: our allies simply won't share sensitive intelligence with us anymore.

Winning!
Click to expand...

Since this is your thread, please be specific as to how Trump put anybody in danger.

How did the world find out about this situation?

Did the Russians run to the media?

Did Trump run to the media?

Please be specific as to how Trump endangered anybody.
 
Mason66 said:
Since this is your thread, please be specific as to how Trump put anybody in danger.

How did the world find out about this situation?

Did the Russians run to the media?

Did Trump run to the media?

Please be specific as to how Trump endangered anybody.
Click to expand...

You responded to the wrong person.
 
danarhea said:
That's right. Our most valuable spy, which was placed inside ISIS by Israel, was outed by Trump when he met with the Russians. Trump, of course, did not purposefully do this, but he let it happen by opening his big fat mouth, and giving up the location of the asset.

No, Trump is not a traitor. He is an idiot. Plain and simple. He is an idiot, and a dangerous idiot to boot, who has put allies of ours in harm's way.

Trump's disclosure endangered spy placed inside ISIS by Israel, officials say - ABC News
Click to expand...

Since this is your thread, please be specific as to how Trump put anybody in danger.

How did the world find out about this situation?

Did the Russians run to the media?

Did Trump run to the media?

Please be specific as to how Trump endangered anybody.
 
Mason66 said:
You are right, sorry.

After a while all the whiners start to look alike.
Click to expand...

You haven't read the article, you haven't read the OP, and you can't even keep track of the people you think you're responding to.

The problem is you.
 
Mason66 said:
Since this is your thread, please be specific as to how Trump put anybody in danger.
Click to expand...

Your ignorance on this issue appears considerable.

Mason66 said:
How did the world find out about this situation?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. However, i'll answer anyway. The world found out because Americans who work for the president thought it was important that the public know what happened.

Note that, if this wasn't leaked, the Russians would have had kompromat on our sitting president. Since it was leaked, the Russians can't hang the bad publicity of this over the presidents head.

Mason66 said:
Did the Russians run to the media?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. The issue is that this was considered Israel's best source on ISIS, and now we've blabbed about their location to Russia who is friends with Iran. Iran is Israel's biggest adversary.

There was literally no reason to mention the city. None.

President Trump thought he was impressing Russia, and really he was handing them compromising information about a major ally- specifically one with useful intelligence resources in the Middle East.

Mason66 said:
Did Trump run to the media?

Please be specific as to how Trump endangered anybody.
Click to expand...

Well, i can't be that specific. You see; the Washington Post has some integrity and kept the details secret.

Funny how that works.
 
Cardinal said:
You haven't read the article, you haven't read the OP, and you can't even keep track of the people you think you're responding to.

The problem is you.
Click to expand...

Yes I did read the OP and it didn't answer the questions I have.
 
Absentglare said:
Your ignorance on this issue appears considerable.



Irrelevant. However, i'll answer anyway. The world found out because Americans who work for the president thought it was important that the public know what happened.

Note that, if this wasn't leaked, the Russians would have had kompromat on our sitting president. Since it was leaked, the Russians can't hang the bad publicity of this over the presidents head.



Irrelevant. The issue is that this was considered Israel's best source on ISIS, and now we've blabbed about their location to Russia who is friends with Iran. Iran is Israel's biggest adversary.

There was literally no reason to mention the city. None.

President Trump thought he was impressing Russia, and really he was handing them compromising information about a major ally- specifically one with useful intelligence resources in the Middle East.



Well, i can't be that specific. You see; the Washington Post has some integrity and kept the details secret.

Funny how that works.
Click to expand...

You say my ignorance on the issue is considerable then say that it is irrelevant how the source was put in danger.

I guess in your ignorance you don't have any specifics either.

How did the source get put in danger.

You are guessing the Russians would have passed on the information.

We do KNOW that the media told the world this happened and with enough details to put the source in danger.

If the details were kept secret by the media, you wouldn't know about them because you didn't hear anything directly from the Trump administration nor the Russians.

Stop being blind.
 
Mason66 said:
You say my ignorance on the issue is considerable then say that it is irrelevant how the source was put in danger.

I guess in your ignorance you don't have any specifics either.

How did the source get put in danger.

You are guessing the Russians would have passed on the information.

We do KNOW that the media told the world this happened and with enough details to put the source in danger.

If the details were kept secret by the media, you wouldn't know about them because you didn't hear anything directly from the Trump administration nor the Russians.

Stop being blind.
Click to expand...

Umm, i answered your question, he blabbed the city the intelligence came from. That compromised the source.

We know Russia is friends with Iran. I mean, do you know anything about the Middle East?
 
Absentglare said:
Umm, i answered your question, he blabbed the city the intelligence came from. That compromised the source.

We know Russia is friends with Iran. I mean, do you know anything about the Middle East?
Click to expand...

You are assuming the Russian ran to Iran with that information, right?

Do you have any concrete information to prove your assumption?

Why do you ignore the media part in endangering the source?
 
Mason66 said:
You are assuming the Russian ran to Iran with that information, right?

Do you have any concrete information to prove your assumption?

Why do you ignore the media part in endangering the source?
Click to expand...

Russia could share the information with its allies. Normally, we constrain the dissemination of classified information. That has the express purpose of preventing exactly what president blabbermouth did. Your whining about whether Russia did or did not tell Iran is irrelevant, neither of us is in a position to know whether they did or not. Why do you have to be so dishonest?
 
Absentglare said:
Russia could share the information with its allies. Normally, we constrain the dissemination of classified information. That has the express purpose of preventing exactly what president blabbermouth did. Your whining about whether Russia did or did not tell Iran is irrelevant, neither of us is in a position to know whether they did or not. Why do you have to be so dishonest?
Click to expand...

I am dishonest?

You are stating as a fact that Russia disseminated the information thereby putting the source in danger when it was actually the media that published the information that actually did that.

You are right neither of us know what Russia did so you cannot say they put anybody in danger.

You are being dishonest here.
 
Mason66 said:
I am dishonest?

You are stating as a fact that Russia disseminated the information thereby putting the source in danger when it was actually the media that published the information that actually did that.

You are right neither of us know what Russia did so you cannot say they put anybody in danger.

You are being dishonest here.
Click to expand...

You are very confused.

We had code-level intel (above top secret) that we did not have permission from our source to share with anyone else.

President Trump unilaterally decided to share that information for no discernible reason. We don't know whether Russia did anything with the information or not; but once it's in their hands, it's out of our control.

I wish you could see the stupidity of your argument. If only there was a case where a politician was accused of being careless with classified information but there was no evidence that it ever leaked whatsoever... hmm....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom