• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's disclosure endangered spy placed inside ISIS by Israel, officials say

Fake News Story 3

The final Washington Post “bombshell” story, which provoked the paper to erupt in celebration, surrounded his sharing of “highly sensitive classified information” with the Russians, endangering sources, methods and angering the source nation that gathered the intelligence.

Well, that nation turned out to be Israel and The Washington Post turned out to be the one who exposed that information. Several officials told PPD–and other outlets have confirmed–that President Trump wasn’t even aware of the source nation at the time.

But again, the predicate of the entire story was false and meant to gin up outrage for something that is common practice. Further, Israel has an intelligence-sharing relationship with Russia, which was sadly cultivated during the Obama years when our closest ally in the Middle East felt abandoned.

National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, Deputy National Security Advisor Dina Powell and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson–the only three U.S. officials in the room–all said the premise of the story as it was written was completely false.

Worth noting, The Washington Post cited anonymous past and current intelligence officials as sources of the reporting, which translates into former Obama administration officials. People’s Pundit Daily has confirmed that the Post did not reach out to anyone who was actually in the room before deciding to run the story.

“The story that came out tonight as reported, is false,” Mr. McMaster said in response. “At no time were intelligence sources or methods disclosed. The on-the-record accounts of those in the room should outweigh anonymous sources. And I was in the room. It didn’t happen.”

“This story is false,” Powell added. “The President only discussed common threats that the countries face.”

If it had happened as The Washington Post claimed, the intelligence community would be required by law to notify members of the House and Senate intelligence committees. If and when a leak of serious nature is revealed, they are legally bound to do so. PPD also confirmed that those committees were not notified, though reports indicate someone on Team McMaster told the intelligence community about the conversation.

Still, 1) that doesn’t prove anything other than what President Trump has been saying all along about illegal leakers being out-of-control and 2) these kinds of disclosures happen all the time. The fact they didn’t end up at the intelligence committees in Congress suggests the IC consensus did not believe any breach had occurred.
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/...ington-post-three-debunked-bombshell-stories/
No doubt President Trump had a rocky two weeks. The People’s Pundit Daily (PPD Poll) Big Data Poll confirmed that to be true. But The Washington Post was prematurely celebrating his demise. Their week, as it relates to journalistic integrity and accuracy, was abysmal.

Do you people understand that destroying a president will destroy this country?
 
Last edited:
My bet is that 45's reception in Israel won't be as warm as it would have been. Is he aware of their history with Russia?
 
You guys had no problem doing that with obama so save your faux outrage and get the **** off your soapbox hypocrite.

This much worse, the media was on Obama's side. Try again
 
This much worse, the media was on Obama's side. Try again

No you guys are just whiners and hypocrites. All the conservative pundits attacked obama so again go cry elsewhere trumpbot.
 
No you guys are just whiners and hypocrites. All the conservative pundits attacked obama so again go cry elsewhere trumpbot.

Conservative pundits were never the voice of the MSM. Get your head in the game.
 
Conservative pundits were never the voice of the MSM. Get your head in the game.

Fox is MSM trumpbot. Get your head out of the sand.
 
Hey, are they or are they not the most watched network on cable?

Pretty lame attempt.

They are not because they are not at war with the president. Anything else I can help you with?
 
There's an ISIS because Obama cut-n-run out of Iraq.

Actually that is wrong there is an isis because obama meddled in syria and libya, in which the power vacuum lead to the formation of isis, which then was powerful enough to take on iraq and al quaeda. Short of the regional destabilization, isis would have had no where to grow, much like al quaeda in iraq did not exist until the invasion, because the dictator there relentlessly hunted them down if they tried to step foot there.
 
They are not because they are not at war with the president. Anything else I can help you with?

Your cognitive dissonance is amazing! Keep picking up and moving those goalposts, because its comedy gold.
 
Your cognitive dissonance is amazing! Keep picking up and moving those goalposts, because its comedy gold.

You repeating what others say is comical in its own right. That original thought is out there somewhere. Good luck.
 
It's been for quite a while, welcome to 2017 trumpbot.

Oh, my another leftist trying to define mainstream? Tell us exactly who is mainstream in the liberal world? Guess we all should get our information from MSNBC and CNN?? Seems that an alternate point of view isn't acceptable in the liberal world.
 
Did you have to change doctors or health insurance, true or false?

So are you saying that Trump is basically as good as Obama? I knew you guys had a secret mancrush on him, but if you're using him as your standard for a great President...
 
Oh, my another leftist trying to define mainstream? Tell us exactly who is mainstream in the liberal world? Guess we all should get our information from MSNBC and CNN?? Seems that an alternate point of view isn't acceptable in the liberal world.

Fox is on most cable networks. As much as CNN or MSNBC. If they are mainstream, so is Fox.

It seems to me that it is you who is trying to redefine "mainstream" for your own political convenience.
 
They are not because they are not at war with the president. Anything else I can help you with?

You are literally disputing the conservative line. I can't tell you how many threads I've seen here with cons bragging about Fox's ratings.

Which is it? Do they get better ratings than the others, or are they out of the mainstream?
 
Fox is on most cable networks. As much as CNN or MSNBC. If they are mainstream, so is Fox.

It seems to me that it is you who is trying to redefine "mainstream" for your own political convenience.

The statement was about Fox NOT being mainstream thus my response.
 
You are literally disputing the conservative line. I can't tell you how many threads I've seen here with cons bragging about Fox's ratings.

Which is it? Do they get better ratings than the others, or are they out of the mainstream?

The left's disdain for Fox is no different than the Right's disdain for MSNBC but you and others want to make an issue of Fox whereas ignore MSNBC. Fox's ratings drive the left nuts
 
The statement was about Fox NOT being mainstream thus my response.

The statement was that Fox is mainstream. For all you whine about comprehension, you display very little of it.
 
The left's disdain for Fox is no different than the Right's disdain for MSNBC but you and others want to make an issue of Fox whereas ignore MSNBC. Fox's ratings drive the left nuts

The statement I replied to was that Fox does NOT have more viewers than the others, and therefore not mainstream.

I'm just trying to get at which is true.
 
The statement was that Fox is mainstream. For all you whine about comprehension, you display very little of it.


thank you very much for your analysis, now reading comprehension seems to be a problem for you. The statement by another posters indicated that Fox isn't mainstream but more like Trump media. My statement was that Fox is mainstream as it reaches millions of people and if it isn't neither are CNN and MSNBC
 
Back
Top Bottom