Re: Poll: Majority of Americans disapprove of President Trump, a near historic low
Re: Poll: Majority of Americans disapprove of President Trump, a near historic low
→ Media_Truth, et al,
Yes, I
do not think that
President Trump will hurt America any more than the mainstream political parties have in the last decade. In fact, --- one could say that the lack of solid work performance and progress by the Members of Congress was a major cause for the defeat of both major parties. For whatever else President Trump may be, he is not a phony patriotic politician
(working on day one towards re-election), and President Trump is not professional politician
(where all they have ever done work the political side of being an American). Populist and Centralist of America are growing in numbers with the idea emerging that they are somehow not being served by the products offered by the Republicans and Democrats.
... ... ...
As for Trump, I don't think we yet know what type of world Military intervention he will promote. He certainly seems to be focusing heavy on North Korea, and a possible unconstitutional military strike there. Or is he using North Korea as a diversion against his Russian ties, and the probably incriminating evidence on his tax returns?
(COMMENT)
It is that very rare person that understand what Kim Jung-un is really doing. To some degree, some of his objectives are obvious: To demonstrate that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) is:
• A political and military power to be force to be reckoned with...
• They can cause the US to react. The US cannot set the conditions for peace with the DPRK.
Through the last three White House Administrations, the US has tried to craft a more viable arrangement that would bring greater security stabilization to the Region. However, not since the Korea Armistice has America been successful in creating a enduring solution. People's Republic of China (PRK) is the political, military and diplomatic power in the region that can interact and influence the DPRK. All America can do at the moment is exercise
(what the career diplomat calls) a policy of "strategic patience"
(jargon meaning nothing of any relevance). Thus, the PRK is the greater "World Power" of influence in the region, and growing ↑ sphere that reach from The Sea of Japan --- to --- the South China Sea and the Dash 9 Line. The success or failure in diplomacy with the:
• DPRK is no diversion.
• The threat posed by the DPRK affects the Russian Federation, South Korea, Japan, The Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, and Vietnam.
• The effects of assertive Chinese policies and projection of influence, will not result in regional instability;
• but will become a greater influence than America and eventually supplant US political, military and diplomatic power in the region.
The Russian ties issue is actually laughable. The media has effected more change and political turbulence into the 2016 Elections, than did the disclosure of any "legal" communications exchanged between Russia and the Trump campaign. While the story writers make accusations, they never actually cite any particular law that was violation and supports the allegations. There is no law that says that you, me, your family or your entire street that prohibits contacting foreign governments
(Canada, Mexico, Britain, Germany --- or --- Russia) and discussing any topic that is not classified. While the allegation is made, I have yet to see any "Probable Cause" ⇔ based on facts, that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the claim or charge is true.
• What is the charge (and statute violated) and what facts do you have that substantiates the allegation?
As for the tax records, this is very much like the
people that made allegations about former President Barrack Obama. See
false accusations that can be used to discredit people.
Most Respectfully,
R
Let's all reduce the snark a touch.
