- Joined
- Feb 28, 2011
- Messages
- 10,565
- Reaction score
- 7,959
- Location
- So. California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
art imitating life? well, kind of :shock:
Sounds to me that United has a strange concept of "stand by".I just read an update, and it said that four passengers were chosen at random when no one volunteered to accommodate four employees traveling stand-by. sounds completely inappropriate, if true.
I didn't get the impression that the flight was overbooked.
United had 4 United crew employees that they wanted to put on an already full flight.
That makes their actions even more heinous.
Yep. Apparently "random" here means "randomly selected among the poorest passengers." Shocker.
The lesson here is simple: don't be poor.
Trying to not be price gouged is a bad thing? Seriously?Yes, the people who pay full fare, or fly a lot, are more valuable as customers than some random person who flies once a year, never signed up for a frequent flier program, and got some bottom-barrel bargain ticket.
If your travel plans are critical on a level like "I need to see patients," pay full fare you cheap ass.
Seriously, there is no excuse for the airline not doing at least this much.
But this is America @2017, there are whole lists of things that we used to be able to do properly that we can no longer manage.
Putin Propaganda Network Brand SpuntnikNews is having great fun with this, because even the Russians can handle this little maneuver....only boarding those who are going.
Trying to not be price gouged is a bad thing? Seriously?
He was sitting in the seat he paid for
Yes he had every right to fly on that plane
https://www.yahoo.com/news/united-p...oved-flight-refusing-give-seat-134930951.html
If I have a paid for ticket, it should be up to me If I choose to take their incentives to get off.
This is simply crazy of United to do this.
The reason for the random draw, was so 4 United employees could fly.
I think they could have prevented people from boarding, but once they have boarded the rules limiting boardingWhy...oh why did the gate agents stop the buyout offer at $800? I'm sure they would have had 4 takers in the $1500 range.
Hell, the whole point with buying out people is to give them the option to hand over their seats on overbooked flights. You're not supposed to remove essential travelers. This guy was a doctor who had to be in Louisville, perhaps even more so than the damned flight crew for whom they bumped those passengers.
At that point, it is no longer a random draw.From what I have read, they pick the person(s) who had paid the lowest fare.
I think they could have prevented people from boarding, but once they have boarded the rules limiting boarding
are out the window.
It does not sound like that had a lottery, but rather picked the passengers who paid the least.My guess is the crew arrived right after boarding. Crew does have priority. But, the way to make room for them is by buying out passengers--not holding a freaking lottery and bumping critical travelers.
No, dumb presumption to dictate how others should spend their money.With allegedly critical travel plans? Yes. Dumb decision. People buying discount fares know full-well they are the lower priority travelers. This isn't just about overhead luggage space. He took the risk and it bit him in the ass.
Regular fares keep the airline operating. Airline profit margins are thin as hell, if you want to keep them around you're going to have to pay for them. That's how the market works.
They had 4 united crew employees they needed to put on an already full flight in order to not cancel a flight for two hundred.
It does not sound like that had a lottery, but rather picked the passengers who paid the least.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/united-p...oved-flight-refusing-give-seat-134930951.html
If I have a paid for ticket, it should be up to me If I choose to take their incentives to get off.
This is simply crazy of United to do this.
With allegedly critical travel plans? Yes. Dumb decision. People buying discount fares know full-well they are the lower priority travelers. This isn't just about overhead luggage space. He took the risk and it bit him in the ass.
Regular fares keep the airline operating. Airline profit margins are thin as hell, if you want to keep them around you're going to have to pay for them. That's how the market works.
I have been on an overbooked flight. They tend to compensate and rebook your flight. I also got a free meal, and sat first class on my next flight.In the linked article they needed four volunteers to leave the plane. They got none. So they said a computer program would be used to select four random passengers.
My question. What would you do, other than don't overbook flights? Seems to me a random draw is reasonable.
Maybe the crew should have been put on an earlier flight? Just a thought.
It's easy for bystanders to just up and say "well they shouldn't have seated everyone."
But airline operations are immensely complicated feats of logistics. Stuff is constantly changing. All it takes is one bit of bad weather in Atlanta or a mechanical breakdown in Detroit and the entire situation can change. Without details like this, it's foolish to assume they were just being dumb about it.
So, what happens when one person in a family of 5 gets randomly selected?