• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Black Lives Matter Philly Bans White People From Its Meetings

Erod

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,483
Reaction score
8,227
Location
North Texas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Black Lives Matter Philly banned white people from an upcoming event, claiming it is a “black only space.”

The April 15 meeting plans to discuss projects and initiatives for the upcoming year and act as a place for people to “meet, strategize and organize.” While children are invited to attend, white people are explicitly banned from the meeting, according to the Facebook event page.

When people began questioning the ban on whites over Twitter, Black Lives Matter Philly stayed by their ban, explaining that their meetings are “black centered.”

Anyone who identifies as “African disapora” is allowed to attend, the group explained over Twitter.

Read more: White People Banned From Philly BLM's Next Meeting | The Daily Caller

Remind me who the racists are again?
 
Remind me who the racists are again?

Are whites oppressed as a group throughout social sectors? I must have missed the memo.
 
Remind me who the racists are again?

Remind me again why anyone ever thought these idiots who discourage allies and thumb their noses at civility were going to be agents of positive change....
 
Are whites oppressed as a group throughout social sectors? I must have missed the memo.

Is your argument that people are free to be pricks if they are victims, cause it sounds like....
 
Remind me who the racists are again?

"The" racists are whichever group happens to outrage you in the present moment? So if I linked to an article focusing on White Supremacists, would they be "the" racists again?

Anyway, I don't think it necessarily best serves a group's interests to be racially exclusionary. You can be white and recognize the inherent value behind BLM's message and lend your support to it. To exclude white people sends the message that white people aren't able and aren't welcome to support Black Lives Matter, and I don't see how that's helpful to them at all.
 
Is your argument that people are free to be pricks if they are victims, cause it sounds like....

Pathetic.

Minority groups, even exclusive ones, are not racist. They empower the disadvantaged.
 
"The" racists are whichever group happens to outrage you in the present moment? So if I linked to an article focusing on White Supremacists, would they be "the" racists again?

Anyway, I don't think it necessarily best serves a group's interests to be racially exclusionary. You can be white and recognize the inherent value behind BLM's message and lend your support to it. To exclude white people sends the message that white people aren't able and aren't welcome to support Black Lives Matter, and I don't see how that's helpful to them at all.

Given the objective of this particular meeting, one of thousands, is to establish perspective, there's nothing wrong with it. Whites are, in fact, welcome in the movement. You will not find a white BLM supporter who does not understand this or that denounces the meeting.
 
Last edited:
I find it interesting that it's called "April Open Meeting" ...... but closed to anyone who doesn't fit this very specific description.
 
Remind me who the racists are again?

All sides, ethnic groups, religious groups, races, ect all over the place have racists.
 
Given the objective of this particular meeting, one of thousands, is to establish perspective, there's nothing wrong with it. Whites are, in fact, welcome in the movement. You will not find a white BLM supporter who does not understand this or that denounces the meeting.

Of course they won't denounce it, but there will be some who feel excluded, even if they understand.
 
Of course they won't denounce it, but there will be some who feel excluded, even if they understand.

The purpose of this meeting, one in thousands, is to establish black perspective. Whites have no place.
 
The purpose of this meeting, one in thousands, is to establish black perspective. Whites have no place.

Does that negate what I said?
 
Does that negate what I said?

Yes. Understanding it is understanding that. If some people want to be idiots and feel excluded when their presence would be counter-productive they're, well, idiots who don't understand.

If a group against police brutality wanted to establish the white perspective on police brutality, and limited one meeting of thousands to whites, that would be fine.
 
Pathetic.

Minority groups, even exclusive ones, are not racist. They empower the disadvantaged.

The only ones that believe this are those that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
 
The only ones that believe this are those that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.

Nice try. Do you always take the racist position?
 
Yes. Understanding it is understanding that. If some people want to be idiots and feel excluded when their presence would be counter-productive they're, well, idiots who don't understand.

*shrug* Oh kay...you can stick with that. I'll stick with people can feel excluded, even if they understand.
 
Nice try. Do you always take the racist position?

Haha...you called him a racist. That means you win! 60% of the time it works every time.
 
*shrug* Oh kay...you can stick with that. I'll stick with people can feel excluded, even if they understand.

You don't know anything about this. You don't understand what's going on. You're just projecting your ignorance onto others.
 
Haha...you called him a racist. That means you win! 60% of the time it works every time.

I called his position racist. And it is. I think he can play the victim card himself and doesn't need you to do it for him.
 
He's not the one making overtly racist comments in this thread.

The establishment of a minority perspective is not racist. Nor is the establishment of any perspective within a larger context of concern.

You think whites can provide black perspective on police violence against blacks? It's not their place.
 
You don't know anything about this. You don't understand what's going on. You're just projecting your ignorance onto others.

Uh huh...keep telling yourself you have special knowledge, oh wise one.
 
I called his position racist. And it is. I think he can play the victim card himself and doesn't need you to do it for him.

Yeah, yeah...we all know the trick of talking about the person's post instead of them as a work-around.
 
The establishment of a minority perspective is not racist. Nor is the establishment of any perspective within a larger context of concern.

You think whites can provide black perspective on police violence against blacks? It's not their place.

If the purpose of the perspective is to exclude others based solely on their race ("... establish black perspective. Whites have no place ..."), then yes, it's racist.
 
Back
Top Bottom