• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Black Lives Matter Philly Bans White People From Its Meetings

Fishking said:
Yeah, yeah...we all know the trick of talking about the person's post instead of them as a work-around.
Click to expand...

Which is why we'll be sending the documents the leakers furnished to the media to prison rather than the leakers themselves. It just makes sense. Oh, wait....
 
Fishking said:
Uh huh...keep telling yourself you have special knowledge, oh wise one.
Click to expand...

I obviously understand what this is about. You obviously continue to ignore that and remain intentionally ignorant. You then attempt to project that ignorance on others.
 
Beaudreaux said:
If the purpose of the perspective is to exclude others based solely on their race ("... establish black perspective. Whites have no place ..."), then yes, it's racist.
Click to expand...

Idiocy.

Explain to me how whites are supposed to provide the black perspective on police brutality against blacks.


Fishking said:
Yeah, yeah...we all know the trick of talking about the person's post instead of them as a work-around.
Click to expand...

I don't know him. I know his post. I address only the post. If that makes you feel lonely, I'm sorry but try not to act like a Snowflake.
 
ecofarm said:
Nice try. Do you always take the racist position?
Click to expand...

I take the position of common sense. You're the one trying to excuse and defend behavior by those that are being racist. So sounds like you're the one taking the racist position to me.
 
Kal'Stang said:
I take the position of common sense.
Click to expand...

No, you take the position of ignorance and hate. You falsely label others as racist because you can't grasp what's happening.

You're the one trying to excuse and defend behavior by those that are being racist. So sounds like you're the one taking the racist position to me.
Click to expand...

There's nothing racist about establishing a minority perspective through minorities.


You think minority groups are racist because they're concerned only with minorities? Of course you do. In case you didn't know, that's racist rhetoric.
 
ecofarm said:
I obviously understand what this is about. You obviously continue to ignore that and remain intentionally ignorant. You then attempt to project that ignorance on others.
Click to expand...

Teach me your ways, sensei.
 
ecofarm said:
The establishment of a minority perspective is not racist. Nor is the establishment of any perspective within a larger context of concern.

You think whites can provide black perspective on police violence against blacks? It's not their place.
Click to expand...

If that is the case then blacks cannot establish any perspective on whites. So its not a blacks place to call whites racists. See how your argument is falling so quickly? All I have to do is reverse the words from "white" to "black" or "black" to "white". Each time you will always say that its whites being racist and deny that blacks can be racist also and by doing such deny the obvious truth that when applied equally your statements fall flatter than a pancake.
 
Fishking said:
Teach me your ways, sensei.
Click to expand...

I already explained that establishing a minority perspective via minorities is not racist.

And there would be nothing wrong with a group against police violence establishing the white perspective via whites, in one meeting of thousands, given the larger context of concern.
 
ecofarm said:
Idiocy.
Click to expand...
I didn't say anything hateful to you, much less call you an idiot. So, please do not do so to me. And, don't try to bull**** me with the "I called your post idiocy, and didn't call you an idiot" because that in-and-of-itself is a personal patronizing attack upon me.

ecofarm said:
Explain to me how whites are supposed to provide the black perspective on police brutality against blacks.
Click to expand...
Deflection. Excluding people based solely on the fact of their race is the very freaking definition of racism. [/QUOTE]
 
Kal'Stang said:
If that is the case then blacks cannot establish any perspective on whites.
Click to expand...

Not "on", "of".

Would you have blacks dictate your perspective as a white?
 
Erod said:
Remind me who the racists are again?
Click to expand...

As long as they aren't using public space or receiving federal dollars I don't care how racist organizations behave behind closed doors.
 
ecofarm said:
I called his position racist. And it is. I think he can play the victim card himself and doesn't need you to do it for him.
Click to expand...

Fishking said:
Yeah, yeah...we all know the trick of talking about the person's post instead of them as a work-around.
Click to expand...

Kal'Stang said:
I take the position of common sense. You're the one trying to excuse and defend behavior by those that are being racist. So sounds like you're the one taking the racist position to me.
Click to expand...

ecofarm said:
No, you take the position of ignorance and hate. You falsely label others as racist because you can't grasp what's happening.
Click to expand...

Rofl...this is just too epic not to point out. Thank you for outing yourself for calling him a racist, despite your denial. Wow...barely ever happens so perfectly, like this.
 
Beaudreaux said:
Deflection. Excluding people based solely on the fact of their race is the very freaking definition of racism.
Click to expand...

No, it's not. You need more education about racism.
 
Fishking said:
Rofl...this is just too epic not to point out. Thank you for outing yourself for calling him a racist, despite your denial. Wow...barely ever happens so perfectly, like this.
Click to expand...

His position, that whites should establish the perspective of blacks, is racist.

He is the one calling others racist because he does not understand what's happening. The BLM is not racist, but he sure wishes it could be labeled such.

He, and others in this thread, are engaged in falsely claiming others are racist.
 
ecofarm said:
Pathetic.

Minority groups, even exclusive ones, are not racist. They empower the disadvantaged.
Click to expand...

No they are discriminating, treating people differently on the basis of race - they are racist ****heads. :shrug:
 
JayDubya said:
No they are discriminating, treating people differently on the basis of race - they are racist ****heads. :Shrug:
Click to expand...

You think whites can establish the black perspective of police brutality?

There's nothing wrong with treating people differently according to race, as long as that treatment is intended to empower a minority.
 
ecofarm said:
His position, that whites should establish the perspective of blacks, is racist.

He is the one calling others racist because he does not understand what's happening. The BLM is not racist, but he sure wishes it could be labeled such.

He, and others in this thread, are engaged in falsely claiming others are racist.
Click to expand...

The problem is your definition of racism is flawed. You're constantly missing the word "systemic" in your definition. Systemic racism is only one form of racism.
 
ecofarm said:
No, you take the position of ignorance and hate. You falsely label others as racist because you can't grasp what's happening.
Click to expand...

Dude, if I hated other people because of their skin color then I WOULD be a racist. But guess what, I don't. Hell, I have family members that are black. Two great kids that bring home A's and B's on their report cards. It'd be awfully stupid of me to hate my own family wouldn't you say?

ecofarm said:
There's nothing racist about establishing a minority perspective through minorities.
Click to expand...

Never said that there was did I? Do you like strawmans?

ecofarm said:
You think minority groups are racist because they're concerned only with minorities? Of course you do. In case you didn't know, that's racist rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Guess you do like strawmans. Because I never said this either. What this thread is about, in case you hadn't noticed, is a group of blacks that are purposely excluding people of a specific race simply because of their skin color. If a white group did the same exact thing then you, and them, would be hollering racists!!! And don't deny that you wouldn't. Because everyone knows that you would. THAT is racist behavior no matter who is doing it. But according to you the only ones that can be racist are whites. Which in and of itself is a racist belief. I can prove it every single time that I exchange the word "white" for "black" whenever you say stupid crap like you did in post 22.
 
Fishking said:
The problem is your definition of racism is flawed. You're constantly missing the word "systemic" in your definition. Systemic racism is only one form of racism.
Click to expand...

No, it's your problem. You need to look beyond (1.) in the dictionary for an understanding of racism. You don't even have a dictionary education on racism because you ignore (2.) through (4.) of that definition. And let's not pretend a dictionary education, even if you included all of it, is a good understanding.
 
ecofarm said:
No, it's not. You need more education about racism.
Click to expand...

It literally is the actual definition racism as accepted by everyone but SJWs. Racism is discrimination based on race, it does not matter who is doing the discrimination.
 
ecofarm said:
Are whites oppressed as a group throughout social sectors? I must have missed the memo.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter. You are either race motivated or you aren't.

BLM is.
 
Well, this thread certainly brought the ignorance of racism out of the woodwork.
 
ecofarm said:
Not "on", "of".

Would you have blacks dictate your perspective as a white?
Click to expand...

If they are calling me racist then they ARE dictating my perspective to other people. Aren't they? And all without knowing what my actual perspective is. Hell, apparently this group in the OP won't even ask me what my perspective is. They're just going to throw me out of their meeting simply because of my skin color. Which is racist.
 
ecofarm said:
You think whites can establish the black perspective of police brutality?

There's nothing wrong with treating people differently according to race, as long as that treatment is intended to empower a minority.
Click to expand...

No, racial discrimination is wrong.

Racial minorities being bigoted against other minorities or the majority is still contemptible, and equally so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom