• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials[W:482,825]

Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

If you want me to address your questions, don't include some mindless insult.

So...was Donald Trump lying when he said this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPJfKdp3bDs

Trump promised that EVERYONE was going to be taken care of...and that the government was going to pay for it. He said this in 2015 while running as a GOP presidential candidate...he also said it was a very "Un-Republican thing" to say. Was he lying?
 
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

The one where you repeat "TDS" over and over again.

You worship Donald Trump. I don't. Just a few short years ago he was a Democrat donating money to Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton. You like leftists. I don't. So your idiotic claims of "TDS" are just that - idiotic. I'm not the one who voted for an unqualified, crass, rude, Clinton-loving lifelong leftist for President. You did. The only derangement was yours.

Hey, keep in mind that the Trump fanatics were calling Ted Cruz a "RINO" when he at first rejected to endorse Trump at the GOP convention. In today's GOP, anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who doesn't love Trump is automatically a "RINO" in the eyes of Trump fans. Strange times we live in.
 
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

The one where you repeat "TDS" over and over again.

You worship Donald Trump. I don't. Just a few short years ago he was a Democrat donating money to Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton. You like leftists. I don't. So your idiotic claims of "TDS" are just that - idiotic. I'm not the one who voted for an unqualified, crass, rude, Clinton-loving lifelong leftist for President. You did. The only derangement was yours.

First of all, I only diagnose people who write posts like this as suffering from TDS. Second, I don't worship anyone or anything. Third, any non-TDS sufferer who has read 5 of my posts is aware that I don't like leftists. So your post is just an emotional rant that is 100% incorrect. But you flying off the handle and mouthing liberal talking points is the norm nowadays.
 
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

So...was Donald Trump lying when he said this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPJfKdp3bDs

Trump promised that EVERYONE was going to be taken care of...and that the government was going to pay for it. He said this in 2015 while running as a GOP presidential candidate...he also said it was a very "Un-Republican thing" to say. Was he lying?

Who knows. We will have to wait and see what type of legislation he actually supports and signs. But as I have said numerous times here, Trump is a deal make not an ideologue. I suspect he is predisposed to favor a government solution. But that is not unusual for republicans. We had Bush in the White House for 8 years. Did he shrink government? No. In fact he expanded Medicare. The truth is, despite all the left wing hair pulling and hand wringing, republican rule leads to expanded government. That's why some of us don't identify as republican.
 
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

First of all, I only diagnose people who write posts like this as suffering from TDS. Second, I don't worship anyone or anything. Third, any non-TDS sufferer who has read 5 of my posts is aware that I don't like leftists. So your post is just an emotional rant that is 100% incorrect. But you flying off the handle and mouthing liberal talking points is the norm nowadays.

You voted for a lifelong leftist, so spare me your claim about not liking leftists.

I don't mouth a single liberal talking point, so your post is a lie. But then again, most of them always were.
 
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

Hey, keep in mind that the Trump fanatics were calling Ted Cruz a "RINO" when he at first rejected to endorse Trump at the GOP convention. In today's GOP, anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who doesn't love Trump is automatically a "RINO" in the eyes of Trump fans. Strange times we live in.

I'm a leftist now, did you know that? Don't worship Trump=you are a leftist. Pathetic. Each time I read one of their posts on here it makes it easier for me to understand how a lifelong liberal reality TV star duped millions of suckers into putting the nuclear codes into his and Steve Bannon's hands.
 
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

I guess you can count the previous GOP presidents, FOX (before Trump got the nomination), and more than half of the GOP among the "liberal media" too, eh? Because he has been attacked by all of those "groups" before, and I doubt any other GOP candidate maybe except Cruz would have been. Heck, GOP even preferred Cruz over Trump.

Fox is not the liberal media but it certainly qualifies as part of the inside washington establishment

Which is decidedly anti trump
 
Last edited:
Re: Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

Trump definitely meant the word wiretap(p). I know he tried to spin it by saying he really meant "surveillance", but that's just horsecrap. If he didn't mean wiretap, then why did he mention Watergate?

Sure he did. Because the idea that the intel agencies could be weaponized against an incoming president is pretty scandalous. Thats exactly the word that was used in several stories way back when. NYT being one. It is intellectually dishonest to claim that word does not mean surveilled in this day and age and could include many formats of surveillance. Still have your rotary phone?
But all that is way besides the issue.

http://lidblog.com/same-ny-times-reporter/

SAME NY Times Reporter Said Trump Team Was Wiretapped In Jan., But Said TRUMP Lacked Evidence In March

"This is the ultimate in liberal media bias. In January Michael S. Schmidt perpetuated the rumor that team Trump had Russian connections, and to support his point he said that Trump’s people were wiretapped. However when President Trump claimed his people were wiretapped, the same guy, Michael S. Schmidt said there was no evidence.

Either the Times editors and Mr. Schmidt are trying to skew the story, or they are all suffering from a form of dementia and have no memory."

NY-Times-FP-012017.webp

"These people at the New York Times write in January that Trump was wiretapped and that’s why we know he was working with the Russians. A month and a half later, Trump claims Obama wiretapped him, and the New York Times writer says, “There’s no evidence of that.” Well, was there no evidence when you wrote about it in January or did you forget what you wrote in January? Is it your raw hatred for Trump, your raw resentment at having lost, is that what’s causing you to lose every ounce of credibility, morality, authority, and credibility that you’ve got?

It’s not Trump who has some explaining to do. It’s not you who voted for Trump who have some explaining to do. You don’t need to justify yourselves, nor does Trump. But the people running this silent coup, the people in the media trying to unseat, trying to damage, trying to sabotage Trump, they have a lot of explaining to do."

Too easy but people will potshot the messenger every time.
 
Back
Top Bottom