• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WH Defends Proposed Cuts to Programs for Elderly, Minorities, and Poor

Born Free said:
Its an excellent reason to offer more money, to stop such events.

But I see you liking the POTUS and our military failing to keep our citizens safe. You would rather sacrifice 3,000 people whenever the terrorist want by cutting out our military, customs, FBI, HLS, DIA, CIA and the like, by defunding them completely.
Click to expand...


as I stated: George W. Bush FAILED America on 9/11 & the US MILITARY failed the US on 9/11 ....... is that any reason to offer the military more money for failure?

ALL government agencies that are in place to protect the American people failed US on 9/11, pretty obvious

Why should failure be rewarded?
 
cuban smokes said:
Hitler did the same thing in Germany in the 1920s & 1930s; it's ALL ABOUT getting rid of the weaker, dependent population so, that when your nation GOES TO WAR your nation is full of a younger, a stronger, a more vital population

have no doubt; BannonTrump is going to war BUT they believe it is a war they can win ............ haha ......... they have ALREADY lost ..........
Click to expand...

Kevin Hart What the.jpg
 
Cardinal said:
"The little brats aren't getting better grades, so no more food for them."
Click to expand...

No. There is no causation between the food program and better grades. The question is are we spending the money for better grades or out of charity. Shall we at least try to be honest?
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Hitler asks a fortune teller "why am I losing the war"

The fortune teller says " it is because of the jewish generals"

Hitler: "But I haven't got any!"

The fortune teller says "ah, but your enemy does"
Click to expand...

Excellent!
 
OpportunityCost said:
No. There is no causation between the food program and better grades. The question is are we spending the money for better grades or out of charity. Shall we at least try to be honest?
Click to expand...

Do you have valid research to back that up?
 
OpportunityCost said:
Not the point and you know it. Go chum the waters somewhere else.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you don't have a problem with starving your own children in order to prove that their grades won't be affected. Put your money where your mouth is.
 
This thread got Godwin'd so ****ing fast.
 
Cardinal said:
I'm sure you don't have a problem with starving your own children in order to prove that their grades won't be affected. Put your money where your mouth is.
Click to expand...

The question should be why the schools started feeding them in the first place and did it lead to better grades. If it didn't, why cant they be fed at home unless they are selling food stamp benefits? It should not be the responsibility of schools to feed kids breakfast and lunch but that is where it has gone. Further, the lunch program is a real mess. I would suspect the graft and corruption is systemic.
 
OpportunityCost said:
From your own source.
Click to expand...

Yes, and? There's less research on that. "Less research available" doesn't mean "no improvement."

Also, who cares? "Kids should only get food assistance if their grades improve?" I mean, seriously?
 
cuban smokes said:
as I stated: George W. Bush FAILED America on 9/11 & the US MILITARY failed the US on 9/11 ....... is that any reason to offer the military more money for failure?

ALL government agencies that are in place to protect the American people failed US on 9/11, pretty obvious

Why should failure be rewarded?
Click to expand...

I take from your statement all those agencies should be eliminated as they failed.
 
Born Free said:
I take from your statement all those agencies should be eliminated as they failed.
Click to expand...

all of those entities FAILED pre 9/11 ............ why should any that FAIL have budgets increased/rewarded for failure?
 
Deuce said:
Yes, and? There's less research on that. "Less research available" doesn't mean "no improvement."

Also, who cares? "Kids should only get food assistance if their grades improve?" I mean, seriously?
Click to expand...

Prove to me you know how block grants work and how school lunches is just cover for that money being dumped into tons of programs other than school lunches.
 
OpportunityCost said:
The question should be why the schools started feeding them in the first place and did it lead to better grades. If it didn't, why cant they be fed at home unless they are selling food stamp benefits? It should not be the responsibility of schools to feed kids breakfast and lunch but that is where it has gone. Further, the lunch program is a real mess. I would suspect the graft and corruption is systemic.
Click to expand...

That is exactly right. Is it not the responsibility of the parents to feed their kids. I know some teachers and they say the kids have to take this and that to be fed properly and everyone dumps what they don't want in the trash can. You could feed the homeless with the food the kids get at school and throw away. And then the kids go to the vending machine and get a bag of chips and a soda. The school meal program is a joke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom