- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 27,656
- Reaction score
- 12,050
- Location
- Over the edge...
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
If that were true, abortion would not be legal.The child has a right to live.
If that were true, abortion would not be legal.The child has a right to live.
Can you even fathom how stupid is what you just posted? How do the fetuses in the instances you listed loose their innocence? What guilt do they have?
If that were true, abortion would not be legal.
And reading comprehension or in your case the total lack of it says a lot about yours. Just in case it is not reading comprehension, is it dishonesty that made you misrepresent what I said because you realized how stupid your post was? Ans by the way, there IS a big difference between something being stupid and someone being stupid. I hope you knwo the difference.The fact you chose to call me stupid says a lot about you and your position.
You have already answered.Rephrase your query without the insults and perhaps you'll get an answer.
More ignorant drivel from you. Do you realize that abortion was legal even before Roe and it will still be legal in many places even if Roe would be overturned?Abortion is legal, that doesn't make it right, and God willing we'll get Roe Vs. Wade overturned
Yea, because those little bastards are guilty.and Abortion pushed back to a procedure only used in limited medically necessary/circumstance as I listed in my post you first quote
:lamo:lamo:lamo yea because abortion is a political ideology. Makes one wonder why so many so called conservatives have them too.not to die at the whim of political ideology.
And reading comprehension or in your case the total lack of it says a lot about yours. Just in case it is not reading comprehension, is it dishonesty that made you misrepresent what I said because you realized how stupid your post was? Ans by the way, there IS a big difference between something being stupid and someone being stupid. I hope you knwo the difference.
You have already answered.
Yes, you so amply have demonstrated that.I can read just fine, and I know the difference.
I just factually commented on what you posted.The fact is you attacked my position and my intelligence
Do you know who finds the truth insulting?that's the very foundation of an insult.
Freedom is a wonderful thing for everyone.I will not respond to such posts any further.
The child has a right to live.
Ahh the arbitrary political line to make your political truth ignore the biological reality.
"You aren't a person until it's politically convenient for you to be one."
How... sad I am for you.
Oklahoma Lawmaker: Pregnant Women Are 'Hosts' Whose Bodies Don't Belong to Them
Women, you may think that the flesh that covers you and the organs and muscles and neurons that make you breathe and poop and eat are your own, but actually they are not. Oklahoma State Rep. Justin Humphrey can see how might “feel like that is” your body, but if you are pregnant, he regrets to inform you that your body is now a “host” and you are an interloping ghost that once used to inhabit it.
Pregnant women only exist as host organisms. Do you believe that, or do women have a right to their own lives?
I just factually commented on what you posted..
Oklahoma Lawmaker: Pregnant Women Are 'Hosts' Whose Bodies Don't Belong to Them
Women, you may think that the flesh that covers you and the organs and muscles and neurons that make you breathe and poop and eat are your own, but actually they are not. Oklahoma State Rep. Justin Humphrey can see how might “feel like that is” your body, but if you are pregnant, he regrets to inform you that your body is now a “host” and you are an interloping ghost that once used to inhabit it.
Pregnant women only exist as host organisms. Do you believe that, or do women have a right to their own lives?
Oklahoma Lawmaker: Pregnant Women Are 'Hosts' Whose Bodies Don't Belong to Them
Women, you may think that the flesh that covers you and the organs and muscles and neurons that make you breathe and poop and eat are your own, but actually they are not. Oklahoma State Rep. Justin Humphrey can see how might “feel like that is” your body, but if you are pregnant, he regrets to inform you that your body is now a “host” and you are an interloping ghost that once used to inhabit it.
Pregnant women only exist as host organisms. Do you believe that, or do women have a right to their own lives?
Which part can you refute?No, it wasn't a factual, it was your opinion.
Which part can you refute?
And you can refute that with what? YOUR opinion?the part where you said her post was stupid
And you can refute that with what? YOUR opinion?
The post was and remains stupid when someone claims on one hand to be on the side of "innocent lives" but is OK with the taking of those innocent lives in some cases? It is also hypocritical and that you are not able to see that is also very telling.
No, that is a fact and your baseless opinion does not change that.Again, that's your opinion, not a fact.
Oklahoma Lawmaker: Pregnant Women Are 'Hosts' Whose Bodies Don't Belong to Them
Women, you may think that the flesh that covers you and the organs and muscles and neurons that make you breathe and poop and eat are your own, but actually they are not. Oklahoma State Rep. Justin Humphrey can see how might “feel like that is” your body, but if you are pregnant, he regrets to inform you that your body is now a “host” and you are an interloping ghost that once used to inhabit it.
Pregnant women only exist as host organisms. Do you believe that, or do women have a right to their own lives?
Unborn children have a right to thier (sic) lives also.